Windows SMP frame times....post them here.

Killer[MoB]

[H]ard|DCer of the Month - March 2008
Joined
Jan 15, 2001
Messages
3,943
Accurate Windows SMP frame times please. If you just want to post some of the log showing the project number and some frames from idle box time, that will be fine. Please include CPU model and current clock speed. I will update this post with new entries. Thanks!


My original spreadsheet is here:
http://members.cox.net/foldinginfo/smp2.htm
Sorted by Project and then by PPDpGHz. Newest entries will be in WHITE rows until the next time I update.

Here is a second offering of the same data. I'll keep both updated as entries are posted. Thanks Sgraffite. :cool:
http://cse.unl.edu/~joclark/hordebase/main.php

It lets you sort by any column, and all the data is stored in a mysql database.

http://members.cox.net/foldinginfo/allsmp.htm Linux/Linux on VM/WinSMP comparison. ATM sorted by CPU brand and then PPDpGHz.

Thanks for all the entries so far. I'll keep updating as they are posted. :)

Update on Linux/LinuxVM/Windows comparison:
Finally a WU common to Linux and Windows.
P2605 is now on Windows.
C2D @ 3.33
13:18 per frame average
1906 PPD
572.6 PPDpGHz

Same machine running VMWare/Suse10.1/LinuxSMP on a 2605 made 2144 PPD. 11:49/f
12.5% faster than Windows.
 
Dual 5150s (4M shared per CPU) @ 2.66GHz
Project 2651 10:14 a frame.

Memory in this box is only 533 instead of 667, so that might hamper it a little since it's running with a divider, it's still quad channel though.
 
zim need to know project number on the left one

1842 PPD on right instance
 
P4D @ 3.0GHz
P2651 (1760) @ 29:08f= 869 PPD (289 PPDpGHz)


My 2.33 Memorn does ~ 1200 PPD on Win SMP.
 
marty9876543210000000000000000000000000000000 nix sucks worst of all so :D:D:D for me![/QUOTE said:
so the 2 of you should be a perfect match...you both suck


this new client is for the 32 bit crowd....64 linux......
 
E6400 @ 3.2GHz
P2610 @ 19:07/f

[15:56:34]
[15:56:34] Writing local files
[15:56:35] Extra SSE boost OK.
[15:56:35] Writing local files
[15:56:35] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0 percent)
[16:11:35] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[16:15:42] Writing local files
[16:15:42] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1 percent)
[16:30:43] Timered checkpoint triggered.
 
Killer[MoB];1030784062 said:
From Dew:
E6400 (2 MB shared cache) @ 3.2GHz
P2651 (1760) @ 13:51/f = 1829 PPD ( 571 PPDpGHz) <---------------seems way way way too fast to be a P2651
Note: I PMed Dew about this unit for verification. It seems more like times for a P2652.

Replied with fahlog.txt


Dunno if it makes a difference, but here are my CPUZ shots of my RAM/CPU:
 
Just an update, overnight when I actually let my box sit idle, I was at 7:33 a frame with the 5160s and project 2610, almost done, can't wait to get the points from this guy.

Zim, what else are your 5355s running, anything else chewing up CPU time for them?
 
E6300 @ 3.32
Is this enough info?

[16:46:44] Project: 2610 (Run 1, Clone 70, Gen 0)
[16:46:44]
[16:46:46] Entering M.D.
[16:46:52] Rejecting checkpoint
[16:46:53] Protein: Protein
[16:46:54] Writing local files
[16:46:55] Extra SSE boost OK.
[16:46:55] Writing local files
[16:46:55] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0 percent)
[17:05:09] Writing local files
[17:05:09] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1 percent)
[17:23:29] Writing local files
[17:23:29] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2 percent)
[17:42:01] Writing local files
[17:42:01] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3 percent)
[18:00:27] Writing local files
[18:00:27] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps (4 percent)
[18:18:52] Writing local files
[18:18:52] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps (5 percent)
 
Zim, what else are your 5355s running, anything else chewing up CPU time for them?

The first unit on the screen shot slowed down from 9:26 to 11:16 for frame 15 when the second unit was started. When I did the figures, I used the times with both units running since that would be the way it would normally be operating.
 
Dual 2.8 Xeon (Prestonia, 400 MHz FSB) with HT 512KB cache per cpu
Project 2652 @ 25:50/F

Yeah, it's slow...
 
This is for the rig in the sig. [email protected] running WinXP 32 bit

[18:06:32] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 75, Gen 0)
[18:06:32]
[18:06:33] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[18:06:33] Entering M.D.
[18:06:39] Calling FAH init
[18:06:40] Writing local files
[18:06:40] ing from checkpoint)
[18:06:40] Read checkpoint
[18:06:40] Protein: Protein
[18:06:40] Writing local files
[18:06:41] Extra SSE boost OK.
[18:06:42] Writing local files
[18:06:42] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0 percent)
[18:17:43] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[18:26:42] Writing local files
[18:26:42] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1 percent)
[18:37:42] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[18:46:06] Writing local files
[18:46:06] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2 percent)

Seems to be a good bit slower than the nix client assuming this is a 1760 point WU.

 
Just an update, overnight when I actually let my box sit idle, I was at 7:33 a frame with the 5160s and project 2610, almost done, can't wait to get the points from this guy.

Zim, what else are your 5355s running, anything else chewing up CPU time for them?
nothing...but remember..running 2 instances PPD X2
 
[email protected] Yonah

This seems awfully slow, but I'm hoping it's the protein...

Code:
[17:54:33] Project: 2610 (Run 1, Clone 86, Gen 0)
[17:54:33] 
[17:54:33] 2610 (Run 1, Clone 86, Gen 0)
[17:54:33] 
[17:54:35] Entering M.D.
[17:54:41] Rejecting checkpoint
[17:54:43] Protein: Protein
[17:54:43] Writing local files
[17:54:44] Extra SSE boost OK.
[17:54:45] Writing local files
[17:54:45] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[18:25:13] Writing local files
[18:25:13] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)
[18:55:42] Writing local files
[18:55:43] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2 percent)
[19:26:11] Writing local files
[19:26:11] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3 percent)
[19:56:37] Writing local files
[19:56:37] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps  (4 percent)
[20:27:05] Writing local files
[20:27:06] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps  (5 percent)
[20:57:15] Writing local files
[20:57:15] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps  (6 percent)
[21:27:21] Writing local files
[21:27:22] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps  (7 percent)
[21:57:25] Writing local files
[21:57:26] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps  (8 percent)

 
Pentium 805D at 3.6ghz

Project 2652: Time per Frame=28 Minutes 26 Seconds
 
E6700 C2D @ 3.4 GHz

P2651 (1760) @ 12:28/f = 2033 PPD (598 PPDpGHz)


BTW, this same machine gets 11:37/f on the 1760 WU running the SMP client in VMware for 2182 PPD so it's pretty close...
 
Thanks for all the numbers so far. :cool:
We need some more AMD numbers too. One of the reasons for the thread is so someone can compare machines that are running the VM/linux setup to see if they would rather switch to the WinSMP. Another reason is to have a nice collection of numbers so someone can easily tell if their machine isn't producing like it should.
 
Yeah I'd been noticing that there weren't many AMD results... I know we must have more Dual Core AMDs out there.

And it looks like the extra cache on my Opty actually helps with the SMP client compared to your X2 Killer.. wasn't expecting that. Might be some other random factor though. I really want to push this chip farther (I know it'll do at least 2.7), but last time I did my folding times went all to hell. It was stable by all measures though. Might have to try again and see if the SMP client plays better.

I'm at 69&#37; on that 2651 though, I can't wait to complete it.


 
Code:
[16:55:10] Project: 2651 (Run 0, Clone 18, Gen 5)
[16:55:10] 
[16:55:10] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[16:55:10] Entering M.D.
[16:55:30]  on if available.
[16:55:30] Entering M.D.
[16:55:36] Rejecting checkpoint
[16:55:37] Protein: Protein in POPC
[16:55:37] Writing local files
[16:55:39] Extra SSE boost OK.
[16:55:39] Writing local files
[16:55:39] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[17:10:40] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[17:21:14] Writing local files
[17:21:14] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)

<SNIP>

[23:21:54] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[23:32:15] Writing local files
[23:32:15] Completed 65000 out of 500000 steps  (13 percent)
[23:47:14] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[23:57:33] Writing local files
[23:57:33] Completed 70000 out of 500000 steps  (14 percent)
[00:12:33] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[00:22:51] Writing local files
[00:22:51] Completed 75000 out of 500000 steps  (15 percent)
[00:37:51] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[00:48:06] Writing local files
[00:48:07] Completed 80000 out of 500000 steps  (16 percent)
[01:03:06] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[01:13:22] Writing local files
[01:13:22] Completed 85000 out of 500000 steps  (17 percent)
[01:28:22] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[01:38:41] Writing local files
[01:38:41] Completed 90000 out of 500000 steps  (18 percent)
[01:53:41] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[02:04:02] Writing local files
[02:04:02] Completed 95000 out of 500000 steps  (19 percent)
[02:19:01] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[02:29:22] Writing local files
[02:29:22] Completed 100000 out of 500000 steps  (20 percent)

Athlon X2 4200+ Manchester (512kb Cache) @ 2.5
 
Athlon X2 4200+ Manchester (512kb Cache) @ 2.5

Thanks OBW. It's right within 1 or 2 PPDpGHz of my X2 on the P2651. Looks like we are right on target to take over the world. Oh wait...that's a different plan.
 
Win SMP:
2652 WU
[00:58:33] Completed 10000 out of 1000000 steps (1 percent)
[01:19:52] Writing local files
[01:19:52] Completed 20000 out of 1000000 steps (2 percent)
[01:41:11] Writing local files
[01:41:11] Completed 30000 out of 1000000 steps (3 percent)
[02:02:33] Writing local files
[02:02:33] Completed 40000 out of 1000000 steps (4 percent)
[02:23:55] Writing local files
[02:23:55] Completed 50000 out of 1000000 steps (5 percent)
[02:45:15] Writing local files
[02:45:15] Completed 60000 out of 1000000 steps (6 percent)
[03:06:34] Writing local files
[03:06:35] Completed 70000 out of 1000000 steps (7 percent)
[03:27:55] Writing local files
[03:27:55] Completed 80000 out of 1000000 steps (8 percent)




Project: 2651 (Run 0, Clone 127, Gen 0)
[12:03:05]
[12:03:06] 651 (Run 0, Clone 127, Gen 0)
[12:03:06]
[12:03:07] Entering M.D.
[12:03:15] rotein in POPC
[12:03:15] Writing local files
[12:03:15] cal files
[12:03:16] Extra SSE boost OK.
[12:03:17] cal files
[12:03:17] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0 percent)
[12:36:23] Writing local files
[12:36:23] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1 percent)
[13:09:57] Writing local files
[13:09:57] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2 percent)
[13:43:34] Writing local files
[13:43:34] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3 percent)
[14:17:08] Writing local files
[14:17:09] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps (4 percent)
[14:50:46] Writing local files
[14:50:46] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps (5 percent)
[15:24:23] Writing local files
[15:24:23] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps (6 percent)
[15:58:04] Writing local files
[15:58:05] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps (7 percent)
[16:31:49] Writing local files
[16:31:49] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps (8 percent)
[17:05:40] Writing local files
[17:05:40] Completed 45000 out of 500000 steps (9 percent)
[17:39:21] Writing local files
[17:39:21] Completed 50000 out of 500000 steps (10 percent)


3800 X2, Biostar 6100-939, 2 X 256mb - 2.3ghz (230 X10)

Running on Win 2k.
 
[email protected] Yonah

This seems awfully slow, but I'm hoping it's the protein...

Code:
[17:54:45] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[18:25:13] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)
[18:55:43] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2 percent)
[19:26:11] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3 percent)
[19:56:37] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps  (4 percent)
[20:27:06] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps  (5 percent)
[20:57:15] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps  (6 percent)
[21:27:22] Completed 35000 out of 500000 steps  (7 percent)
[21:57:26] Completed 40000 out of 500000 steps  (8 percent)

Also on a 2610, Run 0, Clone 60, Gen 0. T2300 @ stock:
Code:
[09:33:24] Completed 120000 out of 500000 steps  (24 percent)
[10:13:31] Completed 125000 out of 500000 steps  (25 percent)
[10:53:40] Completed 130000 out of 500000 steps  (26 percent)
[11:33:48] Completed 135000 out of 500000 steps  (27 percent)
[12:13:58] Completed 140000 out of 500000 steps  (28 percent)
[13:02:42] Completed 145000 out of 500000 steps  (29 percent)
It took you about 2 hours (2:00:49) to do 5 percent. It took me almost 3.5 (3:29:18). Be glad :-/ Frame times just about match the change in speeds, too - ~20 minutes for you, ~40 for me.

How much memory are you running? Rest of system description?
 
Code:
[17:21:07] Project: 2651 (Run 0, Clone 39, Gen 7)
[17:21:07] 
[17:21:08] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[17:21:08] Entering M.D.
[17:21:29]  on if available.
[17:21:29] Entering M.D.
[17:21:35] Rejecting checkpoint
[17:21:36] E boost OK.
[17:21:36] tein in POPC
[17:21:36] Writing local files
[17:21:37] Extra SSE boost OK.
[17:21:37] Writing local files
[17:21:38] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[17:33:35] Writing local files
[17:33:35] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)
[17:45:18] Writing local files
[17:45:18] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2 percent)
[17:57:02] Writing local files
[17:57:02] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3 percent)
[18:08:45] Writing local files
[18:08:45] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps  (4 percent)
[18:20:28] Writing local files
[18:20:28] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps  (5 percent)
[18:32:11] Writing local files
[18:32:11] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps  (6 percent)
Code:
[15:34:14] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 32, Gen 1)
[15:34:14] 
[15:34:14] lete work/wudata_02.pdo
[15:34:14] Warning:  check for stray files
[15:34:14] - Starting from initial work packet
[15:34:16] 
[15:34:16] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 32, Gen 1)
[15:34:16] 
[15:34:19] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[15:34:19] Entering M.D.
[15:34:25] Rejecting checkpoint
[15:34:27] Protein: Protein
[15:34:27] Writing local files
[15:34:27] Extra SSE boost OK.
[15:34:28] Writing local files
[15:34:28] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[15:43:43] Writing local files
[15:43:43] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)
[15:53:03] Writing local files
[15:53:03] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2 percent)
[16:02:18] Writing local files
[16:02:18] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3 percent)
[16:11:31] Writing local files
[16:11:31] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps  (4 percent)
[16:20:45] Writing local files
[16:20:45] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps  (5 percent)
[16:30:05] Writing local files
[16:30:05] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps  (6 percent)

Dual Xeon 5140 (4mb x 2) @ 2.33

Code:
[17:27:43] Project: 2610 (Run 1, Clone 47, Gen 0)
[17:27:43] 
[17:27:44] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[17:27:44] Entering M.D.
[17:28:08]  on if available.
[17:28:08] Entering M.D.
[17:28:14] Rejecting checkpoint
[17:28:16] Protein: Protein
[17:28:16] Writing local files
[17:28:17] Extra SSE boost OK.
[17:28:17] Writing local files
[17:28:17] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps  (0 percent)
[17:43:13] Writing local files
[17:43:14] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps  (1 percent)
[17:58:08] Writing local files
[17:58:08] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps  (2 percent)
[18:13:01] Writing local files
[18:13:01] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps  (3 percent)
[18:27:53] Writing local files
[18:27:54] Completed 20000 out of 500000 steps  (4 percent)
[18:42:45] Writing local files
[18:42:46] Completed 25000 out of 500000 steps  (5 percent)
[18:57:38] Writing local files
[18:57:38] Completed 30000 out of 500000 steps  (6 percent)

Core2Duo E6600 (4mb cache) @ 2.4 (stupid dell :( )
 
Opteron 165 @ 2.7GHz

[12:20:51] Project: 2610 (Run 1, Clone 200, Gen 0)
[12:20:51]
[12:20:54] Entering M.D.
[12:21:01] Rejecting checkpoint
[12:21:02] ing local files
[12:21:02]
[12:21:02] Writing local files
[12:21:03] Extra SSE boost OK.
[12:21:04] Writing local files
[12:21:04] Completed 0 out of 500000 steps (0 percent)
[12:48:50] Writing local files
[12:48:50] Completed 5000 out of 500000 steps (1 percent)
[13:16:36] Writing local files
[13:16:36] Completed 10000 out of 500000 steps (2 percent)
[13:44:19] Writing local files
[13:44:19] Completed 15000 out of 500000 steps (3 percent)

This is also on Vista Ultimate x64. I also think we could see an improvement in all these times since this is the first beta release of the client.
 
Dell M65 Laptop with T5500 1.66GHz WinXP Pro SP2 2GB RAM
Getting 32min16sec per frame with Project 2610 (Run 1, Clone 207, Gen0)
 
Here's mine, currently running a 2610 protein... Anyone know how much it's worth?

smptimes.jpg
 
Here are my numbers for another protein. 2652.

Code:
[13:31:35] Project: 2652 (Run 0, Clone 193, Gen 0)
[13:31:35] 
[13:31:36] Entering M.D.
[13:31:42] Rejecting checkpoint
[13:31:42] Protein: Protein
[13:31:42] Writing local files
[13:31:43] Extra SSE boost OK.
[13:31:43] Writing local files
[13:31:43] Completed 0 out of 1000000 steps  (0 percent)
[13:48:55] Writing local files
[13:48:55] Completed 10000 out of 1000000 steps  (1 percent)
[14:06:08] Writing local files
[14:06:08] Completed 20000 out of 1000000 steps  (2 percent)
[14:23:22] Writing local files
[14:23:22] Completed 30000 out of 1000000 steps  (3 percent)
[14:40:36] Writing local files
[14:40:36] Completed 40000 out of 1000000 steps  (4 percent)
[14:57:54] Writing local files
[14:57:54] Completed 50000 out of 1000000 steps  (5 percent)
[15:15:09] Writing local files
[15:15:09] Completed 60000 out of 1000000 steps  (6 percent)
[15:32:25] Writing local files
[15:32:25] Completed 70000 out of 1000000 steps  (7 percent)
[15:49:41] Writing local files
[15:49:41] Completed 80000 out of 1000000 steps  (8 percent)
[16:06:56] Writing local files
[16:06:56] Completed 90000 out of 1000000 steps  (9 percent)
 
Also on a 2610, Run 0, Clone 60, Gen 0. T2300 @ stock:
Code:
[09:33:24] Completed 120000 out of 500000 steps  (24 percent)
[10:13:31] Completed 125000 out of 500000 steps  (25 percent)
[10:53:40] Completed 130000 out of 500000 steps  (26 percent)
[11:33:48] Completed 135000 out of 500000 steps  (27 percent)
[12:13:58] Completed 140000 out of 500000 steps  (28 percent)
[13:02:42] Completed 145000 out of 500000 steps  (29 percent)
It took you about 2 hours (2:00:49) to do 5 percent. It took me almost 3.5 (3:29:18). Be glad :-/ Frame times just about match the change in speeds, too - ~20 minutes for you, ~40 for me.

How much memory are you running? Rest of system description?

It has 2gb of ddr2 533 ram. Not sure what else would be relevant besides memory but it's a Dell E1505 with a 40gb hard drive and ATI x1400 graphics card running XP Pro. I thought it would be a little faster since it's the predecessor to the core 2 duo. If mine takes 2 hours to do 5 percent, I would think your's would, using the processor speed speed ratio, take about (2/1.67)*2 hours = ~2.4 hours to complete. Does your's have enough memory?
 
[00:16:07] Project: 2610 (Run 0, Clone 137, Gen 0)

[12:56:45] Writing local files
[12:56:45] Completed 120000 out of 500000 steps (24 percent)
[13:27:39] Writing local files
[13:27:39] Completed 125000 out of 500000 steps (25 percent)
[13:58:30] Writing local files
[13:58:30] Completed 130000 out of 500000 steps (26 percent)
[14:29:25] Writing local files
[14:29:25] Completed 135000 out of 500000 steps (27 percent)
[15:00:18] Writing local files
[15:00:18] Completed 140000 out of 500000 steps (28 percent)
[15:31:11] Writing local files
[15:31:11] Completed 145000 out of 500000 steps (29 percent)
[16:02:05] Writing local files
[16:02:05] Completed 150000 out of 500000 steps (30 percent)
[16:34:08] Writing local files
[16:34:08] Completed 155000 out of 500000 steps (31 percent)
[17:05:57] Writing local files
[17:05:57] Completed 160000 out of 500000 steps (32 percent)
[17:37:55] Writing local files
[17:37:55] Completed 165000 out of 500000 steps (33 percent)
[18:09:01] Writing local files
[18:09:02] Completed 170000 out of 500000 steps (34 percent)

C2d E6400 [email protected] 2gb RAM
 
Back
Top