ManofGod
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2007
- Messages
- 12,719
I hate that I like this but the stereotype holds…..
That is the first stereotype that has no basis in reality but, whatever, it is what it is.
I hate that I like this but the stereotype holds…..
I remember that. IE 4.0 had that dreaded active desktop. Wanted to make local browsing look like the web including single click to open. Ugh!I remember using the first version of IE. It came with the weird little add-on disk for Win95 called Microsoft Plus. My school was giving it out for free if you bought a Win95 disk. It was super quick, but it was missing features that Netscape and the built-in browsers for AOL/Prodigy/etc. had. I don't remember why, but I hated Netscape back then, so I stuck with IE. I think I just liked how it was faster. It wasn't until IE version 3 that it was finally up to par.
I remember that. IE 4.0 had that dreaded active desktop. Wanted to make local browsing look like the web including single click to open. Ugh!
Netscape was still preferred but Opera was choice for the speed freaks. Of course a lot of users were still on DUN at home. I was lucky to have fast internet at work back then and got cable (@home network) in 1997. 10Mbps down / 768kbps upstream! 🙃
seems if you just use a legit 7, 8, 10 key its not?! just need tpm2 module on intel or turn on tpm with ryzen to install.When did piracy become cool again?
yup and thats what i understood it was going to be, 10 is supposed to be the core of whatever comes next and then next after that.
From everything we've seen so far, it still looks like you can't choose to have labels show up on the task bar either, so it's all icons moving forward.
It seems the PC in my sig doesn't meet the minimum requirements to run Windows 11...![]()
umm maybe its failing due being in a vm?! ive watched several and posted one vid that states you have to have tpm2 on intel or tpm on ryzen and it installs fine.
i didnt say its failing to install, i was replying about the check tool. tpm is listed as a requirement and that is what is giving the fail message, its posted in the other thread...It didn't fail - it installed fine, despite having no TPM module in the VM. The only thing that "failed" was the health check app apparently giving bad info. Of course it's possible that the final build will be more strict with it's actual requirements.
View attachment 368972
I wouldn't put much faith in what the little app says.
turn on your tpm and try again...I'm not putting any stock in it at all, I just thought it was funny.
can already do it in 10, not sure why they think its a new feature now...The fact that Win 11 supposedly will have built in Android App support is interesting, but it leaves me asking why? Other than for development purposes, why would anyone ever run an Android app on a PC?
Also, one wonders if Bluestacks will survive.
I have a Z270-A board, I can't find a way to enable tpm so it seems only newer hardware will be compatible? I can't see how this would be the case for the full release, surely they would be limiting the amount of users that could upgrade? Or am I being dumb?turn on your tpm and try again...
Just found it has a header, which is fine for me, but as I say, older hardware won't support tpm 2.0 right? So quite a lot of people wouldn't be able to update to 11?You may have to buy a TPM module check support site to see if the board has a TPM chip installed or if it has a TPM header if so you'd need to buy a TPM module to gain TPM functionality.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/tpm-trusted-platform-module-header,5766.html
i doubt it will stay that way and possibly....I have a Z270-A board, I can't find a way to enable tpm so it seems only newer hardware will be compatible? I can't see how this would be the case for the full release, surely they would be limiting the amount of users that could upgrade? Or am I being dumb?
i bet you could still squeeze it onto 32. ive got my w10 installs down to about 19-20gb...Also minimum storage is 64Gb, so my Asus T100 32Gb will for sure not be eligible...
could try them now on 10...I'm really curious about being able to run Android apps. One the biggest weaknesses of Windows 10 is the shitty selection of streaming apps. Outside of Netflix (which actually has a fantastic app), they're all trash. Most are just browser windows so they're limited to 1080p stereo.
Being able to run the Android versions of things like Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, etc. would be fantastic.
can already do it in 10, not sure why they think its a new feature now...
https://www.nirmaltv.com/2021/02/01/how-to-run-android-apps-on-windows-10/
I'm really curious about being able to run Android apps. One the biggest weaknesses of Windows 10 is the shitty selection of streaming apps. Outside of Netflix (which actually has a fantastic app), they're all trash. Most are just browser windows so they're limited to 1080p stereo.
Being able to run the Android versions of things like Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, etc. would be fantastic.
See my 4 year old i7 8700k isnt on the list.
I'm surprised at the steep requirements for it. I'm guessing to prevent some security flaws that were present in old processors?See my 4 year old i7 8700k isnt on the list.
No innovative new way or options to use your computer for work or play.
Before buying a TPM module, if you're on an intel platform, check if you have an option for 'Intel Platform Trust Technology (PTT)' in your bios. It is typically disabled by default. It provides TPM functionality without the need for a separate TPM aftermarket module.You may have to buy a TPM module check support site to see if the board has a TPM chip installed or if it has a TPM header if so you'd need to buy a TPM module to gain TPM functionality.
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/tpm-trusted-platform-module-header,5766.html
not supported does not equal incompatible....Not reading past posts so forgive me if I'm being a lazy pop-tard and reposting info, but here's the list of CPUs that Win 11 will support (and possibly only allow install on?) - honestly it's surprising they're not supporting further back than they are
AMD CPUs: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/window ... processors
Intel CPUs: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/window ... processors
Good thing finally upgraded, my i5 3570k build wouldn't have made the cut otherwise. Also glad I upgraded to a Synology for my Plex server - my Intel J1900 board/build I was using before (and was a WMC server before just a Plex server) wouldn't make the cut as well 😅
1Ghz/4GB/64GB isnt that high, pretty sure thats what 10 is.I'm surprised at the steep requirements for it. I'm guessing to prevent some security flaws that were present in old processors?
not supported does not equal incompatible....
someone around here said they had it on a c2d and an athlon x2...