AdamNesvick
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 2,373
I'm still trying to figure this out, you overclock to save money, but any money you save, is mitigated by the extra cost of the MB than if you just bought a fairly standard motherboard and a faster CPU in the first place.
This trend is really starting to irritate the hell out of me.
Can't we go back the the Celeron 300A days with a $50 processor on an $80 board being faster than the $300+ flagship CPU with a little luck?
This trend is really starting to irritate the hell out of me.
Can't we go back the the Celeron 300A days with a $50 processor on an $80 board being faster than the $300+ flagship CPU with a little luck?