Yup, this was another major reason I defaulted to Asus Strix. I have a Samsung Q950A hooked up to my computer as well as two OLEDs… and a G9 Neo. HDMI is the only channel which allows 12bpc colors on the G9 Neo (which has a huge impact on how colors look with HDR). Secondly the Q950A is useless if I feed in video to it, can only get 4k6Hz, so that takes up an HDMI spot since it acts as an independent sound system
All in all, don’t know why HDMI is becoming so unpopular. My use case is all HDMI; can’t get above 10bpc on the Neo using DP.
I am super annoyed with this card in this regard. My fricking 6600xt did 165hz on 4K over HDMI and with 3060 too on my Samsung Ark 55. I totally don't understand why 4090 is totally not giving me option for my monitor. Its weird and annoying. If RDNA3 does it and nvidia doesn't fix it in drivers. Someone here will have a 4090FE or its going back. Really annoyed by Nvidia here.
So tried a high end 8K display port 1.4a to HDMI 2.1 cable that is rated at 4k 144hz minimum but no luck, shot be able to get 165hz at 8bit with it. Looks like this GPU does not see my Samsung Ark 55 as 165hz at 4k. I would even settle for 144hz. Its a bummer.
Last edited: