Personally, while I do read, enjoy and am entertained by the reviews here, I find them next to useless from a buyers/consumer standpoint.
If I'm in the market for a GPU, I want to see how it stacks up against the competition. I want hard numbers/data taken in a controlled environment (AKA, all settings used are the same across the board) because ultimately, that tells me exactly what I need to know. When settings are adjusted across tests to hit a target framerate, that really doesn't tell me anything. Thats what I, as an enthusiast, already do to to make a game perform to what I consider an acceptable level.
For an example, I just built a 4K gaming box. I wanted to see how various GPU's stood against each other rendering games at 2160p. [H]'s reviews wouldn't of really helped me with that unfortunately. I wanted the BEST performing GPU at the resolution (all else being equal), and I'd adjust settings from there to get the framerates I wanted.
Would it not stand that the best performing card at any resolution is the fastest card on the market? I mean if all you are looking for is the best card, regardless of price, would you not naturally just automatically look at the Titan X? What need is there for a review when there is no card currently on the market that beats it?