Thank you for admitting you were wrong.
I would not call the 1st one a break through and the 2nd is going to be a hybrid not really just OLED.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you for admitting you were wrong.
Just like the OLED fanboy.I did, click on the arrow on the right. This was just a demonstration of how to fit a narrative. Taking pictures with a smartphone does not prove anything or showing anything close to reality.
You probably got this nonsense from "KwizatZ" on AVSFORUMS. You Samsung fanboys are really something special.
How old are you btw?
From a Kuro to a Q90T, but you hate OLED. Fascinating.
Having had a Kuro myself (well it was my dads since I was still a kid then), I have a very hard time believing someone could be satisfied with a plasma and then end up hating OLED and preferring an lcd.Well, they don't make Kuro anymore, nevermind a 4K. It's not that I didn't want to give OLED a chance that's why I went from a KS9500 to a CX and while it was decent at night. It couldn't even compare to the KS in the day time and the reflections was killing me. Should have waited for CES then wait for the QN90A but I just could not stand using the CX for another 6 months.
Having had a Kuro myself (well it was my dads since I was still a kid then), I have a very hard time believing someone could be satisfied with a plasma and then end up hating OLED and preferring an lcd.
I had the 48 C1 and returned it in a couple days. I hated it. The ABL or ASBL whatever all that automatic dimming was miserable. It was the most annoying thing I had ever experienced, unacceptable. Then the low brightness was the biggest deal breaker. The whites look like a pale dim grey or something I hated the look of the whites they don't look actually white. Then the risk of burn in for a windows PC monitor was not the anxiety I need either. I game with HUDs on for hours & I want max brightness I don't want to take any precautionary measure. I don't want to babysit my monitor. I want task bars and menus and HUDs up all the time especially on a large screen where I can afford the extra space for all the static elements up all the time. No way do i wanna hide them & use screen savers & delete HUDs and dim the screen so I don't get burn in. Forget all of that. I bought a QN90A & love it. Gaming like a boss not worried about a thing. Input lag & response times are competitive enough to trade blows with any oled that any argunent is negligible. I also hate my oled phone just as much as I hated my oled LG C1. I've only had it for a year & a half it is has disgusting burn in top it off I cant see a damn thing in daylight I need to find shade to use my phone. Oleds technology is miserable in any light. It's not for me that along with burn in now I'm out & out for good. I'll be happy with my QN90A for years to come & also going to get a Xaiomi Mi pro or something of that caliber & ditch my sad oled phone also & be rid of all oleds in my life foreverr. I have truley grown to hate oled technology over the years & will never own anything oled every again. Made that mistake twice won't make it anymore. Shame on me lol.
Says who? All they said was they want "an awesome monitor for gaming" - so perfectly reasonable to think it might be exactly their use case.Which is not the OPs use case, but ok, cool?
Says who? All they said was they want "an awesome monitor for gaming" - so perfectly reasonable to think it might be exactly their use case.
Chill out my dude.
The FI32U is the closest thing I've seen to a CRT. They have a BFI mode that works with VRR and it looks really good.Still using CRT since forever (F520, FW900) for computing. Perhaps ironic to say in 2021, but they just work. No hassle. (Until someday they don't.)
42 inch comes out in early 2022 if you're not in a rushLG OLED C1 48" is by far the best all around high end gaming monitor there is. Anyone that tells you otherwise is a noob.
Gsync is a must have, high refresh rate is a must have, and OLED picture quality absolutely destroys LCD. The LG G1 has it all. Your only other option is the Gigabyte equivalent which has issues.
If you don't have enough room for it MAKE ROOM. It's worth it.
I don't understand the brightness chase that HDR is forcing on people. These massive displays are so bright you can't possibly run them at max brightness without causing massive eye fatigue. There's a reason the monitor market targets 150 cdl, browsing the web at 400 is agonizing. My 280hz IPS is at 50% brightness and it's still a light cannon into my face. I ran my 55 inch oled C7 as a computer monitor for 2 years, it was great but too big and the 60hz refresh is a deal breaker. If LG ever makes a 240hz oled I will buy it immediately. The 42 inch is nice, I'd prefer 36 but 42 is better than 481st one is useless, a 20% improvement will still be under 1000 cd/m2 and bring the 100% bright level to what 165 cd/m2? pitiful.
2nd one maybe something but guess we'll see if it works out. It's ironic and it took Samsung and TCL to come up with a solution where LG can't. But then, I think we'll see Micro-LED at consumer level before QD-OLED or QDLE.
Moviemaker are now encoding media at over 2000 cd/m2. Does that mean you're going to go blind watching? No! it's doesn't mean the whole movie is brighter. My HDR1000 monitor only shows 129 cd/m2 on this page and 340 cd/m2 while watching a (non HDR) brighter Youtube video. What HDR allows content creator a higher brightness range to work with without sacrificing darker details mostly on highlight, reflections, effects that will momentary dazzle you or allow you to show a bright area in a larger portion of the screen without losing details in the darker area as shown in the this video:I don't understand the brightness chase that HDR is forcing on people. These massive displays are so bright you can't possibly run them at max brightness without causing massive eye fatigue. There's a reason the monitor market targets 150 cdl, browsing the web at 400 is agonizing. My 280hz is at 50% brightness and it's still a light cannon into my face. I ran my 55 inch oled C7 as a computer monitor for 2 years, it was great but too big and the 60hz refresh is a deal breaker. If LG ever makes a 240hz oled I will buy it immediately. The 42 inch is nice, I'd prefer 36 but 42 is better than 48
Moviemaker are now encoding media at over 2000 cd/m2. Does that mean you're going to go blind watching? No! it's doesn't mean the whole movie is brighter. My HDR1000 monitor only shows 129 cd/m2 on this page and 340 cd/m2 while watching a (non HDR) brighter Youtube video. What HDR allows content creator a higher brightness range to work with. mostly on highlight, reflections, effects that will momentary dazzle you or allow you to show a bright area in a larger portion of the screen without losing details in the darker area. OLED can hit OK brightness in small area but cannot sustain a large bright are while maintain details in darker area as show in this video:
Valid points, I guess I'm just the polar opposite of the target audience for HDR gaming. The only games I play are Battleroyales, Rocketleague and strategy. 95% of the time I'm playing Apex legends or Warzone at low settings because frames are more important to me than anything else. A 240hz oled would be a dream for motion clarity, if it could do BFI and Gsync at the same time that would be amazing.
The Aorus FI32U can do this and it's great. Not quite CRT quality, but the closest I've seen on modern displays.if it could do BFI and Gsync at the same time that would be amazing.
Valid points, I guess I'm just the polar opposite of the target audience for HDR gaming. The only games I play are Battleroyales, Rocketleague and strategy. 95% of the time I'm playing Apex legends or Warzone at low settings because frames are more important to me than anything else. A 240hz oled would be a dream for motion clarity, if it could do BFI and Gsync at the same time that would be amazing.
Does your Q90T have the same issues with blooming as the QN90A? I miss the contrast and colors of my OLED every day but I really do need a 240hz+ display.
Rtings: "Sadly, its local dimming feature performs worse in Game Mode than outside of it because it causes more blooming around bright objects and raises the black level. This can be noticeable when playing games with dark scenes, but it's still not too distracting. The VA panel has a lower native contrast ratio than most VA panel TVs because of Samsung's 'Ultra Viewing Angle' that improves the viewing angles, but the contrast is improved with the local dimming. All in all, it's one of the best gaming TVs we've tested."
It's only 144hz... and it's 4k which I probably wouldn't use.The Aorus FI32U can do this and it's great. Not quite CRT quality, but the closest I've seen on modern displays.
https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16824716004
They also have this on the M32U, which uses the same panel but with a no-frills stand for $200 less.
https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16824012042
I thought your tv can do Game mode and PC input at the same time. As far as I can see in the reviews Game mode is required for decent input lag.I never notice the local dimming problem when playing ME:LE and FFXIV and both looks great in 4K@120 but I'm running from my PC but PC mode is not the same as Game Mode.
I thought your tv can do Game mode and PC input at the same time. As far as I can see in the reviews Game mode is required for decent input lag.
Fair enough. I use 3440x1440 on my main machine cause I like it better for work, but my second gaming rig is 4K and I like the picture quality. 144Hz is smooth enough for me.It's only 144hz... and it's 4k which I probably wouldn't use.
...
Anyone that says you can't see the difference between 144hz and 240hz isn't a competitive gamer, the difference is quite dramatic.
awesome. Which Odyssey did you snag?Ended up just buying 2 monitors after I couldn't decide lol....samsung odyssey for gaming, LG Oled for movies