Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would 8K make any sense for normal use (e.g. excluding military and medical uses) given that the human can only distinguish pixels of a 40" 4K monitor from 2.3ft??
One in five. Sounds about right.23% aren't [H]ard.
I think there's more to the equation than just the ability to distinguish pixels, but I do agree it's a case of diminishing returns.
I doubt 8K is something that will interest me for 5+ years. We're barely at 4k/60. I'd much prefer 4k/120 over 8k/60.
Not sure In understand, in that example the Display port 1.4 from a titan RTX has a 32.4 Gbs bandwitch, allowind 7680 x 4320 @ at hz.
A recent TV that support HDMI 2.1 and a new video card that also support HDMI 2.1 should support 48 GBS, more than your example (or was multiple display port use at the same time to feed a single 8K monitor ?)
I understand your disdain for DLSS (though i personally think its incredible), however I don't understand this "8K monitor (not a TV)" part. In the recent crop of sensational 8K gaming video's on youtube, at least two that I can think of were using LG Signature ZX 88" TV's.
That model has a true 7,680 by 4,320 resolution, has HDMI 2.1 and support VRR. What would have to change for that not be be considered "gaming"? I'm failing to see how another display that happened to be marketed as a "monitor" in the same situation would make any difference.
....
The question was indeed not answered, but there was a clue, multiple display port had I would easily imagine an higher bandwith and no or less compression than a 8K single HDMI going on, if there is 0 artifact at the joncture it is more true 8K.So after all that you don't have an answer for my question about the display. The display in question was a true 7680 × 4320 display with a single HDMI 2.1 input. Your "monitor" is a display with a 7680 × 4320 that required some janky multi display port input. If you had the "TV" back in 2017 how would the experience been different? Its the exact same resolution?
8K gaming and PC are 2 different subject, in 2033 most people playing "8K" will probably not be with a PC and for now the only 8K content that exist is pretty much coming out of a PC no (maybe some utlra compressed youtube demo and other nice try, but it is not like there is any movie or tv content to watch in 8K with this) and it is a different subject.For all intents and purposes, an 88" TV is NOT a monitor - yes it can be used for gaming in the living room or a dedicated media/theater room but for 99.9% of owners of that TV, it will not be used as a PC monitor, especially not as a gaming monitor.
So after all that you don't have an answer for my question about the display. The display in question was a true 7680 × 4320 display with a single HDMI 2.1 input. Your "monitor" is a display with a 7680 × 4320 that required some janky multi display port input. If you had the "TV" back in 2017 how would the experience been different? Its the exact same resolution?
True 8K vs DLSS aside, you seem to be standing on some hill that unless the 7680 × 4320 display being used is marketed to you as a "monitor" that its not "8K" which is preposterous.
The question was indeed not answered, but there was a clue, multiple display port had I would easily imagine an higher bandwith and no or less compression than a 8K single HDMI going on, if there is 0 artifact at the joncture it is more true 8K.
But in general really unclear.
8K gaming and PC are 2 different subject, in 2033 most people playing "8K" will probably not be with a PC and for now the only 8K content that exist is pretty much coming out of a PC no (maybe some utlra compressed youtube demo and other nice try, but it is not like there is any movie or tv content to watch in 8K with this) and it is a different subject.
It is not clear what a HDMI 2.1 TV like that do not do that a PC monitor does, for one to be impossible to play a game on it at a 8K resolution are you talking about compression of the signal because it is only one input instead of multiple ?
I don't think you can call 1440p upscaled to 8k, 8k gaming...
The answer is the same: no, it is not.I better question would have been is 1440p dlss upscaled to 4k still 4k.