Ieldra
I Promise to RTFM
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2016
- Messages
- 3,539
I doubt this as wellWhy would Nvidia be in such a hurry to compete with itself?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I doubt this as wellWhy would Nvidia be in such a hurry to compete with itself?
No, I meant that as a message to the person you were replying to..
Cuz we hAve the specs and almost anyone can come up with average gains over 1080. Not rocket science.
Why would Nvidia be in such a hurry to compete with itself?
Sure, we've had the specs for lots of cards over the years.
And there's always someone thinking they're going to apply simple math and get a simple solution.
And it usually turns out that it simply isn't the case.
I think the problem here is with the prices where they are at a 1080Ti would be to close to a 1080 and the titan in price performance. I dont see it happening right now.Since AMD has bowed out of yet another round, why shouldn't they simply go after that tall enthusiast cash?
Why would Nvidia be in such a hurry to compete with itself?
Why would Nvidia be in such a hurry to compete with itself?
Would Nvidia really be competing with itself? They just need to keep the cost difference 1080<1080Ti<Titan X. Not sure why they would need 3 tiers of high end cards...but they need to make the 1080 Ti so I can buy 2. That's all.
Yea... Nvidia likes to keep something up their sleeve...which they can, considering the market.
$600 1080, vs a $1200 Titan. NV is going to need a $900 part... My guess is if the 1080 Ti comes in a few months, it'll be a ~$950 3200 core part. I spent $1000 on a GPU once a before (my two extra Titans cost me $600 and $400), and I'll never do that again. So realistically the 1080 is as high as I will consider this generation.
The Titan cards always come out first.
You can bet that the Pascal Titan will be MUCH more than $999
They make new cards to an approximate schedule and release them.This whole Pascal thing is on its way to a shitstorm it seems. Sure the cards are faster than Maxwell, but something is brewing.
Complete lineup release in a few months and now rumors of Volta coming in 2017 (on 16nm) must mean something. I am a bit excited
I agree. My 128MB GeForce 6800 is still kick'n it!Tell me why in the hell would anyone need an absurd 12GB of ram on a video card? Games would never ever come close to using that much ram. Nvidia is getting out of hand. Titan X is for suckers!
Whats this shitstorm you speak of?
NVIDIA Announces Quadro Pascal Family: Quadro P6000 & P5000
This confirms a 3840 Core GP102, Quadro P6000, due in October.
Seems Nvidia is just selling the chips that don't make the cut as the new Titan X. Probably means we'll see another Pascal Titan a la Titan Black at some point when yields get better, as some have predicted.
Paxwell wasn't even on the roadmap in 2014.
Volta is to compete with Vega.
Given that there is no architecture named Paxwell, it's still not on the roadmap.
At this rate, Vega may not compete with Pascal.
Never heard of the term Paxwell? You must be new around here.
Who knows what Vega will do. It may compete with Volta for all we know.
What we do know is Paxwell was not so well planned.
Never heard of the term Paxwell? You must be new around here.
Dude who signed up in 2011 tells a dude who signed up in 2004 that he's new around here.
Go back to your alternate universe.
you can have a 20 years account here and still be newbie, what he was referring was "new" in the nvidia subforum anyone frequent in this sub-forum in the past months have heard the term Paxwell due the similarities of Maxwell and Pascal....
Wasn't there in issue in FAB for Nvidia where they already wanted to be on 16nm when the release of Maxwell came through? With that, I think in the back of my mind, that Maxwell was a stop gap to get something released (that was targeted for 16nm), but had to resort to 28nm to get to market on time. So I see it as Maxwell was WHAT Pascal should have been, and Pascal is what was Intended to be released, just with some more improvements since maxwell to bring in the new arch with the new release (such as deep learning etc..). That's why I think there a lot of similarities....
Volta is to compete with Vega.
Wasn't there in issue in FAB for Nvidia where they already wanted to be on 16nm when the release of Maxwell came through? With that, I think in the back of my mind, that Maxwell was a stop gap to get something released (that was targeted for 16nm), but had to resort to 28nm to get to market on time. So I see it as Maxwell was WHAT Pascal should have been, and Pascal is what was Intended to be released, just with some more improvements since maxwell to bring in the new arch with the new release (such as deep learning etc..). That's why I think there a lot of similarities....