SR comparison of WD360GD to three 250GB 7200RPM drives in the same price range.
Note that although the WD360GD delivers far and away the swiftest seek times of any of the compared drives, it does not manage to win any of the single user DriveMarks. As a matter of fact, the WD360GD places dead last behind the WD2500KS, Hitachi DeskStar T7K250, and Maxtor DiamondMax 10 in four of SR's five single user tests. It manages to pull into third place in the WoW test. The 7200RPM drives compared aren't even flagships, they are units of modest 250GB capacity, and in the same price range as WD360GD. Not only that, but the 7200RPM drives deliver significantly more capacity, across the board better performance, and run much cooler/quieter, especially when seeking. The WD360GD is obsolete, and a poor choice for any desktop application.
Note that although the WD360GD delivers far and away the swiftest seek times of any of the compared drives, it does not manage to win any of the single user DriveMarks. As a matter of fact, the WD360GD places dead last behind the WD2500KS, Hitachi DeskStar T7K250, and Maxtor DiamondMax 10 in four of SR's five single user tests. It manages to pull into third place in the WoW test. The 7200RPM drives compared aren't even flagships, they are units of modest 250GB capacity, and in the same price range as WD360GD. Not only that, but the 7200RPM drives deliver significantly more capacity, across the board better performance, and run much cooler/quieter, especially when seeking. The WD360GD is obsolete, and a poor choice for any desktop application.