VideoCardz: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X to become world’s first 16-core gaming CPU

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Snowdog, Jun 9, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Chimpee

    Chimpee [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,379
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2015
    I do admit, I am sometimes envious when I see their trick out rig! :D It interesting to see extreme overclocking enthusiast will go to push their hardware.
     
    IdiotInCharge likes this.
  2. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,031
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    The best cpu for gaming is a gpu.
    You want a cpu like this for multitasking... If you only game, then yeah, you save money and build your pc like a console.. gpu heavy that is.
    Its not like you don't have choice.
    Nothing wrong with 16 cores at 750, its just sweetness.
     
    Comixbooks, GoldenTiger and Chimpee like this.
  3. Chimpee

    Chimpee [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,379
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2015
    Indeed, I do find the 12 core 3900X at $499 mighty tempting though, like that is sweet spot for multitasking and gaming at the same time and only $100 more than the 3800X.
     
    blkt, IdiotInCharge and FrgMstr like this.
  4. Gideon

    Gideon 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,144
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    I am still curious to see if dual chiplet or single chiplet make any difference in how they perform tho.
     
  5. IdiotInCharge

    IdiotInCharge [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,240
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    This is one of the reasons that the twelve-core looks more attractive for gaming / single-core performance maximization- you have six cores on each chiplet, so inter-die latency won't come into play for most games, and in having only six cores you're spreading the heat load around if you do load the CPU up versus a single-chiplet eight-core.

    Kind of the best of both worlds part.

    I also don't expect the penalty for going to the sixteen-core part to be that large for gaming, perhaps inconsequential depending on the envelope desired. That's a big step up over the dual-die Threadrippers.
     
    N4CR and Armenius like this.
  6. Randall Stephens

    Randall Stephens Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    400
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2017
    How do you spell flat-footed?

    "I-N-T-E-L"
     
    Master_shake_ and KazeoHin like this.
  7. ChadD

    ChadD 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,927
    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2016
    Looking at the power use difference between the 3700 and 3800 I am wondering if those few hundred mhz aren't really the main selling feature on the 3800. Hopefully there are some decent reviews of these early. I know Kyle has better things to be doing right now... hopefully there is some decent non biased quality reviews before I pull the trigger. Sipping power sounds nice... but I suspect that 3800 might really shine. Then at that point I mean ya 3900 isn't a lot of extra scratch. lol
     
    IdiotInCharge likes this.
  8. Dan_D

    Dan_D [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    53,740
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    I will be getting a hold of a Ryzen 3000 series CPU for review. The real question comes down to whether or not I can get samples ahead of the embargo dates or not to have a review ready on day one.
     
    Armenius, GoodBoy, AlexisRO and 3 others like this.
  9. mda

    mda [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,554
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    What board(s) are you getting for review, too? :)
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
  10. Dan_D

    Dan_D [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    53,740
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Unknown at this time. None of the manufacturers I've talked to are sending review samples of X570 yet.
     
  11. juanrga

    juanrga Pro-Intel / Anti-AMD Just FYI

    Messages:
    2,536
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    AMD marketing formula for TDPs is lies. The technical docs report the real TDPs. Several reviews measured power above 140W in the 12V channel. Anandtech doesn't measure power, but simply estimates power from CPU sensors output.

    Reality doesn't go away by closing eyes:

    The chip is a 140W and the '105W' is marketing lies. The same will surely happen with this '105W' R9 3950X.



    Yep, the 95W i9-9900K is a 95W chip on stock settings. :D And it only goes above the 95W when you enable auto-overclock on the BIOS.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
    Armenius likes this.
  12. mda

    mda [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,554
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    I hope more than a few turn up. That would be a good problem to have :)
     
  13. Dan_D

    Dan_D [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    53,740
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Yes, that would be nice.
     
    Slash3 and mda like this.
  14. juanrga

    juanrga Pro-Intel / Anti-AMD Just FYI

    Messages:
    2,536
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Not for gaming but for work.
     
  15. OrangeKhrush

    OrangeKhrush [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,487
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2016
    Back then HEDT was hardcore, only since 2017 that has been the excuse
     
  16. Uvaman2

    Uvaman2 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,031
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    If AMDs is lies... What is Intels? Complete bullshit and lies?

    Dont mix and match thermal design power rating with just power consumption. Yes they are related but you know well CPU gotten more complicated .

    Quote:

    One of the key debates around power comes down to how TDP is interpreted, how it is measured, and what exactly it should mean. TDP, or Thermal Design Power, is typically a value associated with the required dissipation ability of the cooler being used, rather than the power consumption. There are some finer physics-related differences for the two, but for simplicity most users consider the TDP as the rated power consumption of the processor.

    What the TDP is actually indicating is somewhat more difficult to define. For any Intel processor, the rated TDP is actually the thermal dissipation requirements (or power consumption) when the processor is running at its base frequency. So for a chip like the Core i5-8400 that is rated at 65W, it means that the 65W rating only applies at 2.8 GHz. What makes this confusing is that the offical turbo rating for the Core i7-8700 is 3.8 GHz on all cores, well above the listed base frequency. The truth is that if the processor is limited in firmware to 65W, we will only see 3.2 GHz when all cores are loaded. This is important for thermally limited scenarios, but it also means that without that firmware limit, the power consumption is untied to the TDP: Intel gives no rating for TDP above that base frequency, despite the out-of-the-box turbo performance being much higher.

    For AMD, TDP is calculated a little differently. It used to be defined as the peak power draw of the CPU, including turbo, under real all-core workloads (rather than a power virus). Now TDP is more of a measure for cooling performance. AMD defines TDP as the difference between the processor lid temperate and the intake fan temperature divided by the minimum thermal cooler performance required. Or to put it another way, the minimum thermal cooler performance is defined as the temperature difference divided by the TDP. As a result, we end up with a sliding scale: if AMD want to define a cooler with a stronger thermal performance, it would lower the TDP.



    For Ryzen, AMD dictates that this temperature difference is 19.8ºC (61.8 ºC on processor when inlet is 42ºC), which means that for a 105W TDP, the cooler thermal performance needs a to be able to sustain 0.189 ºC per Watt. With a cooler thermal performance of 0.4 ºC/W, the TDP would be rated at 50W, or a value of 0.1 would give 198 W.

    This ultimately makes AMD's TDP more of a measure of cooling performance than power consumption.

    When testing, we are also at the whim of the motherboard manufacturer. Ultimately for some processors, turbo modes are defined by a look-up table. If the system is using X cores, then the processor should run at Y frequency. Not only can motherboard manufacturers change that table with each firmware revision, but Intel has stopped making this data official. So we cannot tell if a motherboard manufacturer is following Intel's specifications or not - in some reviews, we have had three different motherboard vendors all have different look up tables, but all three stated they were following Intel specifications. Nice and simple, then

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/12625/amd-second-generation-ryzen-7-2700x-2700-ryzen-5-2600x-2600/8
     
    N4CR, Slash3, GoodBoy and 5 others like this.
  17. Spun Ducky

    Spun Ducky Gawd

    Messages:
    602
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Pentium G3258 comes to mind to a chip like this. The one I had easily hit 4.8 while 5ghz was possible on some of them. It was very snappy for the time but realistically I find 4 cores is the minimum for casual use now a days even with just office applications. I think 4-8 cores virtual or not is really the sweet spot now a days at high clock speed/ipc.
     
  18. GreenOrbs

    GreenOrbs Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    358
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2017
    The HardOCP tweet referenced shows that the 9900k is running at ~4.2 GHz. Its totaly unfair when people use non-boost settings to claim that Intel has a lower TDP then turn around and claim that Intel has a higher single threaded-performance based on 5GHz boost clocks.

    While we still are waiting on benchmarks, its totally looking like the 9900KS will retain the single core lead whereas AMD comes close in most games and beats it in a few (like CS:Go). The 9900k is still a great part but the idea that it is actually more power efficient is kinda ridiculous. Everyone knows that smaller node sizes = more power efficiency. I'm sure that once Intel manages to finally move past the 14 nm node, they too will benefit from similar efficency increases.
     
    N4CR, Brackle and Verado like this.
  19. Verado

    Verado Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    186
    Joined:
    May 16, 2017
    You mean retake the single core lead when it comes out. 9900KS availability is like end of year or am I wrong?
     
  20. GreenOrbs

    GreenOrbs Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    358
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2017
    Yes, the 9900KS isn't out yet but a good number of 9900k's can hit that as well currently. You just need to be lucky in the silicon lottery. What they are doing is binning all the best chips rather than let them go out as 9900k chips anymore.

    I think we need to wait for 3rd party benchmarks but the slides AMD put up today seemed to show the 9900k and the R9 to be about equal in many games (winning by a few percent in some games while losing by a few percent in others).
     
  21. Nebell

    Nebell [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,564
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2015
    Meanwhile I'm still gaming on 4 core i3 with no threads
    It works just fine at 1440p.

    What I want however is 8 core 45w 4.5ghz boost for laptops.
     
  22. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,023
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    The way I see it is, we have no idea how close to the limit of the silicon AMD are selling these stock, so no idea what kind of overclock will be possible.

    Because of this, even though I have no need for a 16 core, I may be more inclined to buy one, just because the higher turbo clock means it is at least guaranteed to work at that clock speed.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2019
    Slash3 and IdiotInCharge like this.
  23. Pieter3dnow

    Pieter3dnow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,790
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    I have the same philosophy but it clings to the 12 core part ;) . Since there no 6 core based server parts I would hope that those that are great for overclocking, the binned parts without any competition from either Server or HEDT.
     
  24. TurboGLH

    TurboGLH Gawd

    Messages:
    549
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Not sure that the only use for 6 core will be desktope. Server will use up to 4 chiplets, so a six core will be used x4 to make 24 core SKUs. .
     
  25. Westwood Arrakis

    Westwood Arrakis Gawd

    Messages:
    515
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    I have to build another PC this summer and was going to just use a 2700x. But perhaps a 3000 series may not be out of the question.
     
  26. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,238
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    i don't think they're actually that close to the limit but i doubt 5Ghz is an option though even with a custom loop, AMD has been super strict about the 105w base TDP limit mostly because of the backwards compatibility for x370 boards(x470 boards have much better VRM's and most of the x570 boards the VRM are overkill for the 105w TDP). it's really going to come down to how aggressive the boost algorithm is though to see if overclocking is even worth it for most people.
     
  27. mvmiller12

    mvmiller12 Gawd

    Messages:
    680
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2011
    I keep seeing this, but exactly how true is it really? I'm pretty sure that there are plenty of X370 boards with better VRMs than several X470 boards. My Crosshair VI Hero, for example, has a beastly VRM on it...
     
  28. Rockenrooster

    Rockenrooster Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    231
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2017
    Is there any better X370 board than the Crosshair VI Hero? Ok then...
     
  29. mvmiller12

    mvmiller12 Gawd

    Messages:
    680
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2011
    Asus:
    Crosshair VI WiFi
    Crosshair VI Extreme

    MSI:
    X370 XPower Gaming Titanium

    There may be boards equal to these from Asrock and Gigabyte, but I'm less familiar with their stuff.
     
  30. Rockenrooster

    Rockenrooster Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    231
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2017
    I thought we were talking about power delivery.
    None of the boards you listed had better VRM power delivery except maybe the Crosshair VI Extreme (which didn't specify any VRM upgrades or features on their website, so it might be the same).
    The ASrock Taichi has more phases but they might be lower quality as most all of the overclockers used the Crosshair VI Mobo
     
  31. lightsout

    lightsout Gawd

    Messages:
    869
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2014
    I think the fact that it took LN2 and 1.68v to do 5ghz probably tells us something about the top clocks on ambient cooling.
     
    juanrga likes this.
  32. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,238
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    yeah taichi uses a 6+2 w/ doublers but the vrm's are meh compared to the crosshair's 4+2 w/ doublers. the crosshairs VRM's power delivery is comparable to real 8 phase where as the taichi even with doublers isn't much better than the 6 phases it is.

    other than that most of the boards used 6+2 w/doublers while most of the b350's used 3+3 or 4+3.
     
  33. lightsout

    lightsout Gawd

    Messages:
    869
    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2014
    Saw these on OCN.
     

    Attached Files:

    N4CR, Armenius, Master_shake_ and 3 others like this.
  34. NWRMidnight

    NWRMidnight Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    268
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    We don't know if this was done with a retail chip or an ES chip. You also have to consider if it is the chip that is holding them back from clocking higher, or the brand new motherboard with beta bios installed, as the MB could be a limiting factor.
     
  35. odditory

    odditory [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,327
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Finally. Memory controller parity with Intel, possibly better. Having to buy expensive B-Die sticks to get the most out of Ryzen1/2, and/or having to dick with manual timings, is what kept me away. Yes, I'm lazy.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
  36. NWRMidnight

    NWRMidnight Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    268
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    No, most of them where used for gaming, or enthusiasts due to the cooling solutions required.
     
  37. Comixbooks

    Comixbooks Ignore Me

    Messages:
    12,972
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008

    105 Watts mean air cooling is possible without having a top of the line air cooler. I'm a Intel fan for life though =) Intel keep drilling us Intel Retial Edge folks about how Intel is better even with less cores and I still believe they are right. It's the reason why they kept it at 4 cores and 8 threads for years and burried chips like the AMD 8350 FX which I actually used to own.
     
  38. kirbyrj

    kirbyrj [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    24,195
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Sounds like in order for the Infinity Fabric to run 1:1 with the memory, the cap is 3733 Mhz. After you get beyond that, it drops to 2:1, so you get faster memory speed at the expense of a slower Infinity Fabric link. Probably the sweet spot is going to be 3733 Mhz.
     
    blkt, Armenius, odditory and 2 others like this.
  39. mvmiller12

    mvmiller12 Gawd

    Messages:
    680
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2011
    Better get that 3733 RAM now, boyz! While it is still (relatively) cheap... :)
     
    Armenius and odditory like this.
  40. Brackle

    Brackle Old Timer

    Messages:
    7,205
    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    N4CR, Armenius and Pieter3dnow like this.
Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.