US Officials Warn Congress on Risks of Drones and Seek New Powers to Destroy Them

DooKey

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Apr 25, 2001
Messages
13,548
DHS is seeking new legislation from Congress giving them new powers to disable or destroy threatening drones. They say new legislation will enable them to provide protection from security risks of unmanned aircraft. Further, terrorist are using drones more and more so I understand where they are coming from and as long as it's limited to national security sites I have no problems with a new law that allows the feds to take action against a threatening drone. However, the law of unintended consequences often rears its ugly head and the next thing you know your farm next to a military installation is considered a national security site and your drones are shot out of the air.

"Terrorist groups overseas use drones to conduct attacks on the battlefield and continue to plot to use them in terrorist attacks elsewhere. This is a very serious, looming threat that we are currently unprepared to confront," the officials' testimony said. "Right now we can't test mitigation methods, determine the full scope of the threat or develop counter measures because of outdated legal restrictions."
 
This is unnecessary. 99% of hobby drones are to small to do any more damge to a plane then a bird strike. You can also make a drone that couldn't be jammed and have it fly a pre set path...so short of shooting drones down wich we probably shouldn't be doing under 99% of circumstances this is pointless.

The only thing they are worried about is someone taking a pic of video of something they shouldn't and if you are flying in restricted air space there are laws on the books already to take care of that. If ot ever gets to the point wuere we need AA batteries to protect stuff form drones we are allrady screwed anyway.
 
This is unnecessary. 99% of hobby drones are to small to do any more damge to a plane then a bird strike. You can also make a drone that couldn't be jammed and have it fly a pre set path...so short of shooting drones down wich we probably shouldn't be doing under 99% of circumstances this is pointless.

The only thing they are worried about is someone taking a pic of video of something they shouldn't and if you are flying in restricted air space there are laws on the books already to take care of that. If ot ever gets to the point wuere we need AA batteries to protect stuff form drones we are allrady screwed anyway.
Pretty sure they're not worried about off the self drones. Just ones with a bit of customization. Like a few grams of explosive designed to explode when it's chopped up in helicopter blades. Enough to distort/warp the blade and have it finish itself off. Things like that.
 
im not worried about "terrorists" use of drones here in the US. I am worried about all these companies wanting to use them for delivery.. thats going to be an issue, im sure.
 
Pretty sure they're not worried about off the self drones. Just ones with a bit of customization. Like a few grams of explosive designed to explode when it's chopped up in helicopter blades. Enough to distort/warp the blade and have it finish itself off. Things like that.
If it gets to that point inside the usa that drones are flying bombs that would be the least of our problems.
 
It's already to late, Regulate all you want we common peasants now have the skill sets to manufacture these from scrap parts laying about the work shop just like us hillbillys can make a home made gun from a chunk of pipe. People who wish to do bad things will always do bad things no matter the regulation, this is just people control.
 
This is unnecessary. 99% of hobby drones are to small to do any more damge to a plane then a bird strike.
Like you said, it's less about physical damage and more about actionable intelligence. Connect a telephoto lens and a wireless transmitter to a camera, send it up a few hundred feet, and point it at a sensitive area normally protected by walls.
 
Aren't they using other drones with nets as well as attack birds to combat this already?
 
Back
Top