Uber Could Owe California $7.6M By The End Of The Day

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by HardOCP News, Jan 14, 2016.

  1. HardOCP News

    HardOCP News [H] News

    Messages:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1969
    The California Public Utilities Commission is voting today on whether Uber will be suspended for 30 days and fined $7.6 million for failing to meet data reporting requirements.

    By the end of the day, Uber could be banned from providing rides to residents in California for 30 days and be on the hook for a $7.6 million fine. That is, if the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decides that the company failed to provide required data to the state and treat customers fairly.
     
  2. TechLarry

    TechLarry Can't find the G Spot

    Messages:
    30,165
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    This has shit to do about customers, and everything to do about taxes/the state getting it's cut.

    Lets not kid ourselves.
     
  3. tylertoast

    tylertoast Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    327
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Lets hope it does not get banned, currently uber is employing alot of people full time, and im sure they're busy down in cali.
     
  4. schizrade

    schizrade [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,747
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2003
    Dang, that's a lot of people out of work... gotta love the tax man.
     
  5. viscountalpha

    viscountalpha 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,545
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    As many people that are employed by Uber, I think they deserve every bit of this. They are slimy and unethical.
     
  6. m33pm33p

    m33pm33p [H]ard|DCer of the Month - August 2013

    Messages:
    4,358
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    *citation needed*
     
  7. sean.b

    sean.b Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    147
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    I think the IDEA of Uber is great, and why so many people are quick to defend it. I'm quick to defend the idea, which is what is under attack from the states.

    But, on the other side, if you read about people's experiences as Uber drivers, its not all rainbows and unicorns. Nobody's criticizing the parts worthy of criticism, and instead are attacking the theory behind the business as a whole. I think thats where a lot of the online disagreement comes from.
     
  8. Tuxon86

    Tuxon86 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    198
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Uber is a business and has to play according to the rules governing business. They don't get a free pass because they have a different business model.

    If you wan't to play, you have to pay.
     
  9. Deathroned

    Deathroned Gawd

    Messages:
    555
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2015
    So we agree that the poor should be denied welfare and services right ?
     
  10. tylertoast

    tylertoast Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    327
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    That took a 180 quick lmao.
     
  11. tetris42

    tetris42 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,518
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Sure, if they're running multi-million dollar businesses.
     
  12. nutzo

    nutzo [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,380
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    Sure, lets take old, outdate tax laws and twist them to apply to current business models. Maybe we can also fine them for not having enough horse stalls available.
     
  13. /usr/sbin

    /usr/sbin Successfully Trolled by Megalith

    Messages:
    3,927
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    If the service breaks the law, then yeah. They are denying uber the ability to operate period, not telling them they cannot provide services to people who make less than $xxx
     
  14. SLee

    SLee Gawd

    Messages:
    955
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2002
    It's not even about tax laws. It's new regulations that were put in place specifically for companies like Uber and that required them to provide information to California about their rides, such as when and where they occur and driver safety.
     
  15. JNavy89GT

    JNavy89GT [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,777
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
  16. Tuxon86

    Tuxon86 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    198
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    This as no relevance to what I've said...
     
  17. Jarod888

    Jarod888 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,408
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    This has a lot more, possibly everything to due about monopolistic taxi company's buying politicians so that they can continue their monopolistic ways. Uber, and other pick up services are a direct and possibly "life ending" threat to taxis. They are going to do everything in their power to stop them, plus there's always the greedy government trying to get as much tax revenue as they can so that they can continue to provide welfare to the low income voter class which keeps them in office. This is essentially the content provider argument. Big cable can't afford for people to dump them for streaming service. Taxi services can't afford for people to not use them and instead use uber.
     
  18. Krazy925

    Krazy925 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,428
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    To keep this all in perspective here, they did fine them but didn't shut them down. Gee, that's real altruistic of the government no matter what perspective you have. Either they are in violation of law and should be suspended or they aren't in violation of law and shouldn't be fined. Ever notice how California likes to have its cake and eat it too?