What on earth are you talking about. Sorry but you do not get to re-write history to serve some sort of agenda. Do you have any clue ( of course you don't ) how many times gamers have asked for a game on a past Nintendo console only to be told no, it was too under-powered? time and time again in the past devs said they could not bring whatever game to Nintendo. If you would open your eyes you would see that it's already happening with the Nintendo Switch lol. People, a lot of people have started to ask for games and already the Devs are saying the same thing they have always said.
Look, between Nintendo and Xbox, I would def keep a Nintendo, especially if it could play more games. A lot of people feel the same way. But, you're missing the larger argument altogether and that is, The Switch is another gimmick, not my words, everyone elses. Parents are already invested with the "portable' 3DS for their kids, in the millions. So ... parents are expected to buy their kids yet another portable system on top of the portable system they have already invested in? This is going to be very confusing to potential buyers of which many happen to be parents. Remember, Nintendo is larger bought and paid for by parents, not teens like the Xbox and PS4. Oh, lets not get started on all the addons that jack up the hidden costs of the Switch.
I am pretty damn positive The Switch is going to fail.
I think the best chance Nintendo had was going back to the basics, increasing horse-power and launching with an incredible library of all their classics. Why you zeroed in on just my high powered comment and took my entire argument out of context was very rookie of you. lol.
The fuck are you ranting about? What does ANY of that have to do with what the market could or could not support? Did you even fucking read my post?