The perfect 4K 43” monitor! Soon! Asus XG438Q ROG

Kev13Dd

n00b
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
15
Ok so I got some answers for a few of my questions I asked Acer supports.

1. This monitor does not have DSC.

2. I asked them:

'Will I need to use 2x DP 1.4 cables to achieve 4K @ 144Hz, and if so, will g-sync still be active on this monitor when using 4K @ 144Hz.'

Their response was:
'No support when 2DP mode'

Not entirely sure how to interpret that response., but it sounds like it does not support g-sync when using 4K @ 144hz?

3. There is 16 local dimming zones.

Sounds like I may have to wait for the ASUS XG43UQ.
Just like how unlikely it was that the Acer would be a significant improvement over the XG438Q, the same applies to the XG43UQ; same panels, very similar results. A little more brightness isn't going to change much
 

Zarathustra[H]

Official Forum Curmudgeon
Joined
Oct 29, 2000
Messages
29,630
Just like how unlikely it was that the Acer would be a significant improvement over the XG438Q, the same applies to the XG43UQ; same panels, very similar results. A little more brightness isn't going to change much

I don't mind if it tops out at 120hz. I'm unlikely to get that high in the titles I play with the settings I use anyway, and I'm not a twitchy competitive online player, at least not anymore.

I'd be interested even if the VRR range was only from ~55-99, as long as the image quality is otherwise good.
 

Wag

Gawd
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
993
At this point I might as well just wait for all the displays to be released before I make a decision.
 

Kev13Dd

n00b
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
15
I don't get it.

The DSC display should be released within the next 6mos or so.
I think the implication is that in 6mos there will be another "on the horizon" monitor that is worth waiting for
 

Wag

Gawd
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
993
I think the implication is that in 6mos there will be another "on the horizon" monitor that is worth waiting for
Whatever. If they have $1500 to play with good for them. I’d rather wait a few more months to get a better picture of the 43” display market. It’s not like there are a lot of them.
 

shadow2761

Limp Gawd
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
163
I just want the DSC and HDR1000 and 144Hz with G-sync @ 43" and I will call it a day.

But the Alienware OLED gaming displays also has my interest....lol
 

shadow2761

Limp Gawd
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
163
Wow, just found out the Alienware 55" OLED gaming monitor is actually available already at a staggering $7K AU!

But no HDR support (max brightness 400 nits) probably to prevent image retention, no HDMI 2.1, only 120hz and @ $7K AU, definite pass thanks.
 
Last edited:

candre23

n00b
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
17
Why is BGR a problem? It is a common pixel format in VA panel televisions and I never saw that as a problem. At least in the case of 4K screens the pixels are so fricking tiny that it, to my eyes anyway, does not really should not matter in what order the subpixels are.
The problem is at 40+ inches, the pixels aren't tiny. Pixel pitch on a 43" 4k monitor is about the same as a 21" 1080p monitor. You can absolutely see every pixel (this is actually a desirable feature for productivity purposes because you can and should run at 100% scaling), and BGR subpixels lead to noticeably-crappy text rendering. It's not an issue for TVs because you're not sitting close enough to see it, but it's very much an issue for desktop monitor use.

I have an old 39" seiki 39" panel at home with RGB subpixels. I have newer TCL 43" panel at work with BGR subpixels. The difference is very noticeable. The reason I still have the seiki - even with it's shitty 30hz limitation - is because it's still hard to find anything that beats it for productivity.
 

elvn

2[H]4U
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
3,459
The problem is at 40+ inches, the pixels aren't tiny. Pixel pitch on a 43" 4k monitor is about the same as a 21" 1080p monitor. You can absolutely see every pixel (this is actually a desirable feature for productivity purposes because you can and should run at 100% scaling), and BGR subpixels lead to noticeably-crappy text rendering. It's not an issue for TVs because you're not sitting close enough to see it, but it's very much an issue for desktop monitor use.

I have an old 39" seiki 39" panel at home with RGB subpixels. I have newer TCL 43" panel at work with BGR subpixels. The difference is very noticeable. The reason I still have the seiki - even with it's shitty 30hz limitation - is because it's still hard to find anything that beats it for productivity.

. . .

If you have the space you can make a separate command center desk island and put a tv on a pillar stand freestanding or on a wall. I wouldn't sit closer than 4 feet with a 55inch at the closest, perhaps a little farther for comfort especially if using another screen along with it. Maybe in 21:9 or 21:10 resolutions letterboxed when using the extra side game world real estate peripherally for immersion in things like driving games I could sit nearer.

Currently I sit 3 feet or so from 43inch but I have more than one monitor so I could probably sit a bit farther back. The perceived ppi is a function of viewing distance of course so as you drop back the ppi shrinks to your perspective too. If I were much farther than 3 feet Id probably have to start scaling past 100% on 43 inch 4k.
 

Panel

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Messages
456
Man, when’s the Acer and other Asus going to come out? I feel like I’ve been waiting an eternity!
 

shadow2761

Limp Gawd
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
163
Man, when’s the Acer and other Asus going to come out? I feel like I’ve been waiting an eternity!
The Acer 43" was already released in Australia about 2 weeks ago. They sold out in about 1 week and now it says pre-order, next batch available January.

Im guessing US should get their first batch soon?
 

clayton006

Gawd
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
996
So I've having this problem with my display when plugged into my desktop 2080Ti (link to onedrive photo) it basically squishes to 4:3. The info panel in the OSD says 3840x1080. I used to have a 3440x1440 monitor attached. I've tried 4 different displayport cables and none of them fix this. When I use DDU to remove the driver, the screen is normal but at a locked refresh rate. It isn't until I install the drivers where this thing takes a dump.

Before I wipe out and reload windows, any suggestions?

What I should also mention, is that when this monitor is plugged into my Area51m laptop using a Mini-DP to DP cable (RTX 2080 non maxq) I don't have any issues with it. Which makes me think my desktop OS is borked, or something with these full DP cables are screwed up.
 

clayton006

Gawd
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
996
So I've having this problem with my display when plugged into my desktop 2080Ti (link to onedrive photo) it basically squishes to 4:3. The info panel in the OSD says 3840x1080. I used to have a 3440x1440 monitor attached. I've tried 4 different displayport cables and none of them fix this. When I use DDU to remove the driver, the screen is normal but at a locked refresh rate. It isn't until I install the drivers where this thing takes a dump.

Before I wipe out and reload windows, any suggestions?

What I should also mention, is that when this monitor is plugged into my Area51m laptop using a Mini-DP to DP cable (RTX 2080 non maxq) I don't have any issues with it. Which makes me think my desktop OS is borked, or something with these full DP cables are screwed up.

UPDATE: It appears reloading my OS from scratch has resolved the issue.
 

Panel

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Messages
456
it's already been available for a while at a reasonable price of $1400... though at a bigger 43" size (which still proves my point, a 32" 4K panel is not more expensive to produce than a 43 one, otherwise, those 4K phone screens would cost tens of thousands of dollars).
Wait wait wait… if this thing exists, with 4K 120Hz, what the hell are we all waiting for over in the thread about the 43” Asuses and the upcoming 43” Acer?! Why do those 3 displays matter at all is this thing exists?! I don’t think I’ve been more confused in a good few months…
Can someone please explain this?!
 

Panel

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Messages
456
The Acer 43" was already released in Australia about 2 weeks ago. They sold out in about 1 week and now it says pre-order, next batch available January.

Im guessing US should get their first batch soon?
Any reviews from Australia answering our quality concern questions?
 

euskalzabe

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
May 9, 2009
Messages
1,041
Can someone please explain this?!
Uh... people trust brands they know more than ones they don't know? Also, Wasabi Mango probably doesn't give you a US warranty, I'm guessing - but I don't know.
 

Panel

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Messages
456
43" is a crazy size, go 32" for desktop or 55" for sofa gaming.
I’ve heard so many people vouch for desktop 40” gaming, but my gut feeling has always been the same as yours. It seems like it’ll end up being juuuuust big enough that I’ll find it ridiculous for anything other than a small subset of games.

And desktop work? Yes, having everything open on the same screen and squinting/zooming my eyes all around to find what I’m looking for is sooooo much better than tabbing between a few maximized applications on a reasonably small display and scrolling down a few lines. :wtf:

All sarcasm aside, despite all these theoretical issues, I can’t help but feel that there may be something wonderfully immersive about this size; it makes me want to try it out for myself. After all, I’ll never truly know until I do. :p
 

kasakka

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,444
I’ve heard so many people vouch for desktop 40” gaming, but my gut feeling has always been the same as yours. It seems like it’ll end up being juuuuust big enough that I’ll find it ridiculous for anything other than a small subset of games.

And desktop work? Yes, having everything open on the same screen and squinting/zooming my eyes all around to find what I’m looking for is sooooo much better than tabbing between a few maximized applications on a reasonably small display and scrolling down a few lines. :wtf:

All sarcasm aside, despite all these theoretical issues, I can’t help but feel that there may be something wonderfully immersive about this size; it makes me want to try it out for myself. After all, I’ll never truly know until I do. :p
Well in truth most of us would prefer a 36-40" 4K screen but because nobody makes one we have to settle for bigger. I feel ultrawides are better for working with multiple windows side by side as I have never liked arranging things in a grid. Maximized apps don't make sense on any decently sized display unless they actually make good use of that space (e.g. image/video editing apps, IDEs, Excel etc).
 

clayton006

Gawd
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
996
I just purchased this monitor yesterday and returning it today. I think I could get used to the size as my desk is a bit deep, but the black smearing of a VA panel I couldn’t get over. I lowered the refresh rate to 100 and made sure the overdrive was on 4 of 5. Both of those helped but didn’t get rid of it. This is my first VA panel and lesson learned...
 

Panel

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Messages
456
Well in truth most of us would prefer a 36-40" 4K screen but because nobody makes one we have to settle for bigger. I feel ultrawides are better for working with multiple windows side by side as I have never liked arranging things in a grid. Maximized apps don't make sense on any decently sized display unless they actually make good use of that space (e.g. image/video editing apps, IDEs, Excel etc).
If I end up buying a TV instead of a high refresh large format monitor, I’d want to get one of the slightly older curved models instead of the newer flat ones. I’d actually forgotten that there did exist a few 40” models, so I think that might be better. Those 3” are bound to have some impact, I’m sure. I really do want to try it out, but am afraid I’ll dislike it.

Yeah, maximizing doesn’t make a lot of sense on big displays as its a lot of wasted space, but as you pointed out, plenty of apps to make good use of it. On a 27” or bellow, I can tolerate maximized browsers because the wasted space isn’t enough to be distracting. It makes it easy to just maximize everything I need. On my old 30” 16:10 display, I didn’t have the same sentiment.

I agree with your side-by-side point. There’s no real reason why looking up is more comfortable, but I still think I’d prefer a TV to that 49” ultrawide because at that 32:9 aspect ratio, pretty much NO applications make good use of all the space in maximized mode. And browsers? It’s a sea of white space! On a 16:9 43” display, I still wouldn’t be able to maximize normal applications like browsers, but the ones that normally maximize well (IDEs, Excel etc) STILL maximize well. Like, with the ultrawide I can never maximize anything again. But with the 43”, at least I can maximize SOME things.
 

kasakka

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,444
If I end up buying a TV instead of a high refresh large format monitor, I’d want to get one of the slightly older curved models instead of the newer flat ones. I’d actually forgotten that there did exist a few 40” models, so I think that might be better. Those 3” are bound to have some impact, I’m sure. I really do want to try it out, but am afraid I’ll dislike it.

Yeah, maximizing doesn’t make a lot of sense on big displays as its a lot of wasted space, but as you pointed out, plenty of apps to make good use of it. On a 27” or bellow, I can tolerate maximized browsers because the wasted space isn’t enough to be distracting. It makes it easy to just maximize everything I need. On my old 30” 16:10 display, I didn’t have the same sentiment.

I agree with your side-by-side point. There’s no real reason why looking up is more comfortable, but I still think I’d prefer a TV to that 49” ultrawide because at that 32:9 aspect ratio, pretty much NO applications make good use of all the space in maximized mode. And browsers? It’s a sea of white space! On a 16:9 43” display, I still wouldn’t be able to maximize normal applications like browsers, but the ones that normally maximize well (IDEs, Excel etc) STILL maximize well. Like, with the ultrawide I can never maximize anything again. But with the 43”, at least I can maximize SOME things.
I agree that big displays would benefit from being curved as it helps looking at the edges if you can't push the display back and maybe use DPI scaling to shrink it down a bit.

I feel browsers should not be maximized even on 27" 16:9 screens. I am a web developer and most of the time run mine in something around 1280-1400 pixels wide because anything larger is typically just white space or stretching things to long lines.

Super ultrawides are best used with multiple smaller windows side by side. As I write this I have two browser windows, an IDE and Slack open on it, each at a very comfortable size. Video and audio editing apps are actually perfect for a display this size because they have long timelines that will require less scrolling that way. Massive spreadsheets with a huge pile of columns might be another good use case.
 

Panel

Limp Gawd
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Messages
456
I feel browsers should not be maximized even on 27" 16:9 screens. I am a web developer and most of the time run mine in something around 1280-1400 pixels wide because anything larger is typically just white space or stretching things to long lines.
I don’t know, maybe it’s the simplicity of just pressing that maximize button, or the distraction of my wallpaper, but I just can’t stand using it windowed. It’s definitely a personal, borderline irrational usage, but it’s the one I’m sticking with lol
 
Last edited:

sethk

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
1,728
I use the Win + Right Arrow to dock at 50% (or a display fusion preset) for precisely that 1 press/ click simplicity.
I do hope some more people make 120hz gaming focused monitors (IPS!) in the 38-43" size, it is a sweet spot fr people with desk space.
 

elvn

2[H]4U
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
3,459
I use the Win + Right Arrow to dock at 50% (or a display fusion preset) for precisely that 1 press/ click simplicity.
I do hope some more people make 120hz gaming focused monitors (IPS!) in the 38-43" size, it is a sweet spot fr people with desk space.
I use a 43" 4k 60hz + 32" gsync 144hz + 43" 4k 60hz. The 4k tvs were $230 and $270 which is pretty cheap for how great they look on desktop/apps and movies with their VA black depths.

For larger monitors you should be viewing them more remotely rather than in your face so that requires a larger command center set up the larger the monitor/array becomes. The distance makes the monitor extents less out of bounds and also shrinks the ppi to your perspective. Much farther than the 3' I'm viewing my 43" 4k screens and I'd have to start scaling past 100% 1:1.

It seems like if you subtract about 1/6th of the monitor's diagonal size you get a rough estimate of a reasonable "nearest" viewing distance to work from. (rough "nearest" estimate, not necessarily "best" distance).

Monitor size divided by 6 , times 5 = viewing distance
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15" = 12.5" (around 1')
27" = 22.5" (a bit under 2')
32" = 26.6" (a few inch past 2')
43" = 35.8" (about 3')
55" = 45.8" (3.8' - 4')
65" = 54.16" (4.5')
70" = 58.33" (4.86' - 5')


I butted a kideny shaped height adjustable desk up against the slim desk I have my 43" 4k monitors mounted on so that I could view them comfortably at 3' or so from screen surface to my eyeballs. I'm waiting on the 1000nit 43" 4k 120hz models to see how they are reviewed. While I think the ug438q is ok overall, I don't think it excelled in every facet like it should have so to me it's not worth the inflated price they are asking currently.
I use a bunch of displayfusion shortcuts I customized to different window sizes and positions and monitors. I mapped them to customized icons on a stream deck so I just press a button and the window pops to where I want it and at what size. It really comes in handy.


eosJHa8.png


When I click the button with the back facing LG 32gk850g icon on the stand, it moves the active window to the middle of my central 32" monitor in a page orientation with space on the sides.
The UHD 4ktv button moves the active window to the samsung 43" 4k on the right side at full height, right side of screen 60% screen width.
Pressing any of the "4k" red squares moves windows to uneven window sizes on my left 43" 4k screen for better view tiling.
The other buttons are pretty self explanatory.
Corner XL is useful in order to not have to extend your gaze upward when viewing a web page or if playing a movie on the side, but full height 60% is great for viewing galleries.

Displayfusion can also remember the size, position, and what monitor apps were last on which is helpful next time you launch the app.

It's really easy to set up a hotkey in displayfusion. The function menu has a little target icon you drag to (and release on) the title bar of whatever window you want that function to map to once you have the window size and position exactly where you want it.

----------------------------------------------

I'd rather have one big wall of high rez display space, placing high hz gaming window/virtual monitor and other app windows wherever I wanted to if such a thing were available someday. Once you get a ton of desktop/app space it becomes more like a storyboard and some old limitations and habits become unnecessary. I can still maximize stuff but generally only do that for movies or slideshows on the larger monitors anymore. When I'm doing some heavy dual pane file management I'll use a full height directory opus instance but usually at 60% width, not full screen unless it's on the 32" monitor. I still do fullscreen for gaming on the gaming monitor though of course, and as I said full height on some things when desirable.
 

kasakka

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,444
I'd rather have one big wall of high rez display space, placing high hz gaming window/virtual monitor and other app windows wherever I wanted to if such a thing were available someday. Once you get a ton of desktop/app space it becomes more like a storyboard and some old limitations and habits become unnecessary. I can still maximize stuff but generally only do that for movies or slideshows on the larger monitors anymore. When I'm doing some heavy dual pane file management I'll use a full height directory opus instance but usually at 60% width, not full screen unless it's on the 32" monitor. I still do fullscreen for gaming on the gaming monitor though of course, and as I said full height on some things when desirable.
I really wish that MS would improve the way fullscreen is handled in Windows. A pretty common question for new ultrawide users is if they can fullscreen their game and have a twitch chat etc on part of the screen. This thing is just not happening with the way Windows is setup right now because it tends to fullscreen things on the whole monitor (which I guess makes sense since it is "full screen"). Even though DisplayFusion can split the screen in as tiny chunks as you want, running a YouTube video or Netflix in fullscreen on that slice of the screen only isn't happening easily. They are slowly going in the right direction by removing exclusive fullscreen and replacing it with a borderless window solution that doesn't have the drawbacks like forced triple buffering and Vsync. That at least gives more pleasant Alt+Tab switching. The option to constrain fullscreen behavior to a portion of the display would help a ton when using displays with a lot of desktop space.
 

euskalzabe

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
May 9, 2009
Messages
1,041
I’ve heard so many people vouch for desktop 40” gaming, but my gut feeling has always been the same as yours. It seems like it’ll end up being juuuuust big enough that I’ll find it ridiculous for anything other than a small subset of games.
I used a 40" 4K Samsung TV from 2 to 4 years ago, and really enjoyed it for gaming. Most of the time I forced ultrawide custom-resolution because I enjoy that aspect ratio better. The VA panel helped a lot in forgetting about the top/bottom black bars. For work though, that's when I could feel it was just a bit too big, and despite sitting back becoming a regular reflex, it was always a bit "too high" due to its size.

Well in truth most of us would prefer a 36-40" 4K screen but because nobody makes one we have to settle for bigger. I feel ultrawides are better for working with multiple windows side by side as I have never liked arranging things in a grid. Maximized apps don't make sense on any decently sized display unless they actually make good use of that space (e.g. image/video editing apps, IDEs, Excel etc).
it really deppends on what you're working on. If you're video editing, ultrawides are wonderful. If your work entails mostly Word/Excel/Powerpoint/Acrobat... they're designed mainly for 16/9. While I used a 29" LG ultrawide last year this became annoying, I had to move my head around a lot, all the time. It actually started bothering my neck. While wonderful for gaming, it wasn't great for Office-type workloads. That's why I ended up getting a 16/9 QHD monitor: good vertical space for work, but you always custom-res to ultrawide 1080p for gaming and it ends up being just a bit bigger than a 29" ultrawide panel would be.

I just purchased this monitor yesterday and returning it today. I think I could get used to the size as my desk is a bit deep, but the black smearing of a VA panel I couldn’t get over. I lowered the refresh rate to 100 and made sure the overdrive was on 4 of 5. Both of those helped but didn’t get rid of it. This is my first VA panel and lesson learned...
Don't paint all VA panels with one brush. My Philips has exactly 0 perceptible smearing. I've certainly seen it in many VA panels (how could you not! it looks terrible) but many modern VA panels barely have this issue if at all. And I've specifically tested this in space-games to see how much/if the stars disappear in the blackness of space when moving the camera.
 

kasakka

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,444
it really deppends on what you're working on. If you're video editing, ultrawides are wonderful. If your work entails mostly Word/Excel/Powerpoint/Acrobat... they're designed mainly for 16/9. While I used a 29" LG ultrawide last year this became annoying, I had to move my head around a lot, all the time. It actually started bothering my neck. While wonderful for gaming, it wasn't great for Office-type workloads. That's why I ended up getting a 16/9 QHD monitor: good vertical space for work, but you always custom-res to ultrawide 1080p for gaming and it ends up being just a bit bigger than a 29" ultrawide panel would be.


Don't paint all VA panels with one brush. My Philips has exactly 0 perceptible smearing. I've certainly seen it in many VA panels (how could you not! it looks terrible) but many modern VA panels barely have this issue if at all. And I've specifically tested this in space-games to see how much/if the stars disappear in the blackness of space when moving the camera.
Those 29" 2560x1080 screens are IMO the worst kind of ultrawide because they are wide horizontally but really narrow vertically. Not a whole lot of room for content when you have a taskbar and menus taking the bottom and top. For ultrawides I'd want 1440 vertical or higher.

I totally agree about VA panels, there are big differences between them. I have no complaints about the Samsung CRG9 panel in terms of black smearing and I know how that looks because my Samsung KS8000 TV has some. I haven't noticed it one bit on the CRG9. The ASUS XG438Q seems to be a particularly bad case in this regard.
 

l88bastard

2[H]4U
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
2,639
Don't paint all VA panels with one brush. My Philips has exactly 0 perceptible smearing. I've certainly seen it in many VA panels (how could you not! it looks terrible) but many modern VA panels barely have this issue if at all. And I've specifically tested this in space-games to see how much/if the stars disappear in the blackness of space when moving the camera.
giphy.gif
 

elvn

2[H]4U
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
3,459
32gk850g has the best overdrive+response times I've seen on a VA. It's still not perfect but most other VA's cut a lot less % of black trailing transitions out.

Sample and hold smearing blur from lower range fps+hz overshadows VA black trailing until you get closer to 100fps solid (40% sample and hold smear reduction) to 120fps solid (50% sample and hold smearing reduction) ranges. Until your frame rate averages are well into those ranges at 100fps average or better your motion clarity isn't clear enough to make black trailing an issue really. A little black edging trailing outside of the lines is washed out by the whole thing smearing outside of the lines with sub 100fps sample and hold blur. Once you do get into higher fps ranges though, the gk850g has the highest % of VA black trailing transitions removed including more middle transitions thanks to it's good response time for a VA but especially due it's excellent overdrive. Unfortunately from all reports and reviews, the xg438q did not match the bar the gk850g set in this regard.

Until I get an oled TV with 120hz off of a hdmi 2.1 nvidia gpu someday (which still suffer bad sample and hold blur and low motion definition until you are in 100fps+ average ranges and 100hz+) - the gk850g works well and is a a 1440p resolution that allows me to get 100fps+ average with less compromise. I'll never go back to 870:1 and 980:1 contrast levels and their accompanying 1/3 black depths on tn and ips. I also use a 43" 60hz VA on either side of my gaming VA which are great for desktop/media, streams and movies, etc. and they have several thousand more contrast ratio than the gk850g's ~3000:1 at around 4200:1 and 6100:1 on the tvs.
 

elvn

2[H]4U
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
3,459
People play consoles on tvs of which many are VA, and at low fps. Unless you are running high fps (e.g. 100fps ave. or better) on a 100hz+ monitor your sample and hold smearing is worse than any black trailing so a lot of people don't have enough motion clarity to be discerning to start with. Of course depending on how demanding the title and settings are and assuming it's a high resolution monitor.

The gk850g has much reduced black smearing even at higher fps but it's not perfect.
https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/lg_32gk850g.htm#gaming
Above are some pursuit camera tests running the screen in the optimal 'Faster' response time mode, at both 120Hz and 165Hz. You can see the dark trailing evident at both refresh rates behind the moving UFO, particularly on a dark background where the black outline of the UFO is changing to a dark shade. It's on dark content where the black smearing becomes most noticeable. You can see that a little bit more smearing and blurring is visible at the max 165Hz refresh rate, and that's because the pixel response times have trouble keeping up with the frame rate of the screen. You start to get more noticeable smearing, especially with blacks. So despite the added refresh rate helping to reduce perceived motion blur in theory, the performance is being limited by the response times of the pixels themselves. We would recommend sticking with 120Hz for optimal performance, although 120 - 165Hz is still useable and doesn't look terrible. If you're using G-sync for instance and wanted to use the full range up to 144Hz or 165Hz, it is still very usable, and you may not be pushing frame rates that high regularly anyway.
So there is a sweet spot for VA even if still not 100% black trail free. All monitors, even OLEDS, suffer massive sample and hold blur at 60fps/60hz and lower and to get up to a "soften" or fuzzy blur at 120fps+120hz. Once you go past that, even VA with the best overdrive get much worse black smearing and the increased motion clarity will make it more obvious besides. At massive frame rates and very high hz the sample and hold blur can be cut to a haze at 480fps at 480hz+ and down to essentially zero blur at 1000fps @ 10000hz (most likely using some future form of interpolation) but VA's response time isn't 100% at even 120fps at 120hz+ (8.3 ms per frame).
 
Last edited:

shadow2761

Limp Gawd
Joined
Mar 11, 2016
Messages
163
Sorry, still no pro reviews on the Acer 43". I should hv bought it even though it doesn't have DSC, it was only $900AU ($650US) more than this Asus 43".

EDIT: Checking out google, it seems you guys now have the Acer 43" available @ $1499. So you guys can go nuts now.
 

Wag

Gawd
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
993
Sorry, still no pro reviews on the Acer 43". I should hv bought it even though it doesn't have DSC, it was only $900AU ($650US) more than this Asus 43".

EDIT: Checking out google, it seems you guys now have the Acer 43" available @ $1499. So you guys can go nuts now.
You first. :p
 
Top