The Government Can Use GPS to Track Your Moves

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by HardOCP News, Aug 27, 2010.

  1. HardOCP News

    HardOCP News [H] News

    Messages:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1969
    The courts have ruled that it is not a violation of your rights for the authorities to stick a GPS tracking device on your car to collect evidence against you. :eek:

     
  2. HardOCP News

    HardOCP News [H] News

    Messages:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1969
    If this has you worried, just do what I do…I pretend the government is always tracking me, that way I won’t be surprised when I find out they actually are following me.
     
  3. lilfiend

    lilfiend [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,434
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    what if your car is in your garage?
     
  4. Hop-Scotch

    Hop-Scotch Gawd

    Messages:
    933
    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    So there is no reasonable expectation of privacy if I say have a gated drive way on a few fenced in acres? I beg to differ.
     
  5. clarkkent57

    clarkkent57 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    467
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    If the government tracks me, they'll only be wasting our money while proving that I just might be the most boring person alive.

    However, if I actually FIND a GPS module under my car, I'll be sure to see what I can do towards humanely attaching it onto the collar of a stray animal.
     
  6. djoye

    djoye 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,764
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    So the federal government is saying that it's OK to film cops out on the road. Guess that case is settled.
     
  7. dgingeri

    dgingeri 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,830
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    They can't go in your garage without either your permission or a warrant.
     
  8. dgingeri

    dgingeri 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,830
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    fenced in? That would require a warrant. Out in the open doesn't.
     
  9. dgingeri

    dgingeri 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,830
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    you guys should see the paranoid responses to this over on the Daily Tech forum. You'd think this allowed the government to search your computer for pron and tell all your neighbors about it.

    It's not that big of a deal. This just means that if your car is out in the open, they can track it. They could do that anyway by just tailing a person. This method just allows them to track someone with less chance of being caught and diverted, and to do it with fewer people. The only people that need to worry about any of this are the really, really bad people.
     
  10. RickyJ

    RickyJ Gawd

    Messages:
    989
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    When I heard about this yesterday, I told a friend of mine that it'd be funny to move the tracking device to the officer's wife's car. Might be in for a surprise!
     
  11. jvz555

    jvz555 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,258
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    My history teacher told me about this and the court ruled in favor of the cop, because in the first amendment, it says nothing about privacy. I think this is BULL! :rolleyes:
     
  12. jeverson

    jeverson [H]Lite

    Messages:
    95
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    SAY WHAT!? I also believe it is still legal to shoot someone that is trespassing on your property. Someone needs to bug the A-hole's car that made that decision and put it on the web so that everyone can track his movements. Then we'll see if he still feels there's "reasonable expectation of privacy". Un-F'ing believable.
     
  13. TehQuick

    TehQuick 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,738
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    With GPS in every modern phone, I seriously doubt that the feds need to stick anything to your car - they can just ask your cellular company to track any and all your moves lol :D
     
  14. hasoos

    hasoos Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    328
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    It seems to me that a simple no trespassing sign should be enough to suffice that they do not have permission to enter your property. It is legally binding. All everybody has to do is post a sign that says that, and they should legally, be good to go. At least in their own driveway. But it wouldn't stop them from slapping it on your car somewhere else.
     
  15. Betaboy1983

    Betaboy1983 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,263
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Indeed, ever wonder why everyone can't live without a cell phone? They are sooo kewl! This is nothing new. It's part of the beginning of a coup d'etat.
     
  16. Jutsu

    Jutsu [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,886
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Time to buy a decoy car that i take out only when i am doing illegal things..
     
  17. ryan_975

    ryan_975 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,073
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    A "No Trespassing" sign is not enough to create a reasonable expectation of privacy for "open fields,"
     
  18. venm11

    venm11 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,236
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    I don't think there's any difference. You cannot trespass without at least probable cause or permission; the same with physical private property like a car.

    I think they're equating this with line-of-sight observation from a public location. Perhaps, once you go onto private property and tamper with private property. This is the same as walking up someone's lawn and pushing open a window so you can see whether they're doing anything illegal.
     
  19. ryan_975

    ryan_975 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,073
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    They have to have a warrant for that though. They don't have to for put a GPS tracking device on your car while it's available to the public (that includes sitting in your unsecured driveway.
     
  20. PynkFloydd

    PynkFloydd Gawd

    Messages:
    617
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Not sure what state you live in, but I consulted with a cop here in IL and he said that you can only use an approriate and justified level of violence to respond to a threat to yourself or your property. Meaning that someone simply stepping on your property wouldn't be enough to justify shooting someone. ...and that a court would take into consideration whether the response to the threat warranted shooting them. Oh...and that doesn't stop their family (or them if they're still alive) from suing you.
     
  21. grizzed

    grizzed Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    171
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    the same should apply to clothing - they aren't searching you, just your clothes.

    If you take your clothes in public there is no expectation of privacy.
     
  22. ryan_975

    ryan_975 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,073
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    That would fall under your effects. Now, if you take your jacket off, set it on the table, and walk away...
     
  23. rufio

    rufio [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,347
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Wonder if they would pitch a fit if it were reversed? Can I put a GPS tracker on a gov employees car when it is out in the open? Seems only fair.
     
  24. ryan_975

    ryan_975 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,073
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    That would be called stalking.
     
  25. Wolfkin

    Wolfkin [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,086
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Why is anyone surprised by this? For gods sake, you got NSA and echelon, CIA, Homeland Security, so it was only a matter of time before something like this happened.
    We who are living outside USA have seen a big change in USA after 9/11, I don't know if you see it yourself but the whole country has gone apesh** paranoid.
     
  26. Insula Gilliganis

    Insula Gilliganis [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,460
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    I wonder how this decision jives with another similar court decision made earlier this month..
    http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2010/08/06-0

    Court Rejects Warrantless GPS Tracking

    No wonder I never wanted to be a lawyer and hate TV law shows.. except for this guy cuz he always won..

    [​IMG]
     
  27. rufio

    rufio [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,347
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    I prefer the term 'Checks and Balances' :D
     
  28. dgingeri

    dgingeri 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,830
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    This has NOTHING to do with privacy. This is for cases where the car is out in the open only. It does not cover cars in garages or behind fences. That is the whole basis of the ruling. Even a "no trespassing" sign is not enough. If someone can just walk up to the car unobstructed, they can legally put a tracker on it, but they cannot defeat any attempts at privacy on the property.

    Also, you can't just shoot someone on your property, nor even in your house, unless they are threatening you. In your yard, even if threatened, you can't just shoot. Inside the house, you can shoot if they forced their way in, but aren't threatening you. If you invited them in, they have to be threatening in order for you to legally shoot. There are restrictions. It does have to be "affirmative defense." There is no defense if a kid runs into your yard to retrieve a ball and you shoot him, or a guy cuts the corner of your yard while walking along the sidewalk, or a meter reader walks up to the house to get a reading, or a couple Mormons walk up to your front door to tell you about God. There are many harmless points for someone to walk onto your property, and this include official police business.
     
  29. dgingeri

    dgingeri 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,830
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Actually, you could. Private investigators do it when they have cause.
     
  30. MrValentine

    MrValentine [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,309
    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    I'm sorry but if they are really really bad people they could get a search warrent without a problem. All this does is allow them to track honest citizens without issue.
     
  31. madcap magician

    madcap magician Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    328
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Fed law enforcement is not wasting their time putting tracking devices on just anybody. Contrary to popular belief, they still have to get approval from everybody AND their brother outside of the courts. So don't worry, your roaches are safe in your car ashtray.
     
  32. Ruoh

    Ruoh [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,858
    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    The only reason they passed this rulling was so that the case it actually applies to didn't get thrown out. I'm sure the DEA/AG made some phone calls and got it ligitimized just so they could take down this pot grower.
     
  33. randomdean100

    randomdean100 Gawd

    Messages:
    640
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Only question is, if I remove and destroy it can they get me on destruction of government property, I mean in my eyes they attached it to my car they are basically giving it as a gift to me.
     
  34. BladeVenom

    BladeVenom [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,707
    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2005
    I can imagine the police and courts would come down hard on you if you tried tracking police or politicians.

    "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
     
  35. 10Neon

    10Neon Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    252
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    So if I am a government employee living in a toney house in the suburbs with an attached garage, then enforcers may not attach GPS to my car without warrant. However, if I am a young waiter living in an apartment with resident parking lot, then enforcers may attach GPS to my car without warrant.

    Oh my. This must be in violation of the Patriot Act. ;-)

    What say you, ACLU?
     
  36. Blown 89

    Blown 89 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,437
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    In my state they need to cross the threshold, that includes the garage, and they can't be invited or have to be refusing to leave (with limitations obviously). Every state is different. My car is garaged so if I find someone in there they will get shot. If they're in the driveway there isn't anything I can do.
     
  37. MrValentine

    MrValentine [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,309
    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Man your way off. This has EVERYTHING to do with priviacy. I dont care if the car is in the open or in my garage. They dont have a right to track it without cause/ie search warrent. If they have cause then they can talk to a judge and get a warrent. I dont have issue with them fighting crime, but I have a issue with them trying to circumvent a key part of our judicial system.

    And FYI in TX the castle law states that once an intruder is in your house they are a threat just by being inside the house. No other cause is needed to kill them. AND the castle law also extends to vehicles in TX. Put your hand in my car and i have the right to kill you for it.
     
  38. jandar

    jandar Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    309
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Castle law in Florida is the same.
    Come on my property (including my car), I can shoot to kill, and I do not have to retreat from you at all.

    What happens when a cop is sticking a GPS on a car and the car owner thinks he is stealing the car and shoots and kills the cop? Many states have a Castle law and allow this.
     
  39. ryan_975

    ryan_975 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,073
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    It's NOT an invasion of privacy unless they breach a barrier designed to keep the public away. If any Joe Blow can walk up your driveway, then it's considered in the open. Keep in mind, this does not mean the cops can search your car without a warrant. Only that they can track where it goes. It's only slightly different than having a car tail you all day to see where you go.
     
  40. Json23

    Json23 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,380
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2005
    The police state is coming. Better stock up on ammo and reinforce your bomb shelter.