Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact that the GTX 460 is in the discussion of 6870 performance is good enough to purchase one for $169 AR.
I'd still get the Nvidia equivalent even if it's $10 cheaper because of other intangibles like better driver support for linux. Basically you can go either way, there is no clear winner. I think the GTX460 1GB price drops stole the show from the 6800 series release overall. Good move by Nvidia. If the GTX460 1GB some how lowers to $149, then there really is no reason to buy a 6850 at all.
I don't think it stole the show- it showed how good the AMD cards were that Nvidia had to drop their prices so much just to get close.
So buy a cheapo 1GB for $180 and change the clocks.Sure the GTX460FTW wins, but look at the price on that thing!
Good to hear. Given the amount of OC potential in some of these 460's (950 cores), it would be interesting to see what can be done w/ a 6870. Looking forward to this and would love to see a highly clocked 460 in there.We have some 6850's and 6870's coming in to test with voltage tweaking capability, so we will see how they overclock without voltage tweaking, and then with.
Also, I am going to be very blunt here, but you are fooling yourself if you think the 6870 competes on performance with GTX 460 1GB.
So if I then compare the GTX 460's performance to the GT 240 does that suddenly make the GT 240 a better card? Of course not. People are talking about how badly the 6870 stomps all over the GTX 460 - close in performance they aren't.
Of course there is a clear winner - and it isn't the GTX 460. Even if the 460 1GB ends up at $150, there would still be a very good reason to buy the 6850 - that reason being the 6850 is *faster*. Not by much, sure, but it's still faster (source: the [H] review). If you really really want an Nvidia card, feel free, but don't pretend it is on par with the 6870 when it loses to the 6850.
I don't know, there are still some instances where the gtx 460 1gb out does the 6850:
Plus with the GTX 460 you get better linux support, and perhaps better driver support overall.
We have some 6850's and 6870's coming in to test with voltage tweaking capability, so we will see how they overclock without voltage tweaking, and then with.
Also, I am going to be very blunt here, but you are fooling yourself if you think the 6870 competes on performance with GTX 460 1GB.
Dark Shroud said:Just wait, Asus & MSI already have models out with better components and Gigabyte has a better fan.
If I used linux more then windows I admit I would take a 460 over the 6850, but thing is that most people dont but a gaming card to game in linux. Most buy them to game in windows. Beyond that I refuse to buy nvidia cards because of there poor driver support. Seems like every time I update drivers I have to wait for another update because they just screwed something up..
Agreed. Nvidia has been dropping the ball on drivers lately and I've been sorely disappointed.
They both drop the ball often enough. Problem is most people don't realize the time and effort required to actually get drivers done. Software is a finicky thing, and they seem to do a better job than they used to, and similarly overall to me these days.
Same approximate performance ---> 6870 and GTX 460 (1GB version)
Prices today @ Newegg ---> $239 vs $169 (AMIR for the Zotac 1GB)
Not a tough decision, IMHO. While the 6870 might have an edge, it's not a $70 edge.
I really don't think you are going to miss that 1-5 fps average that the 6870 will have over the gtx460 1gb especially after you save the $70. Plus once you OC the gtx460 it is as fast as a 5870. That's a $169 card putting out the performance of a $350 5870.
I think that the 5770 is the way to go personally. Overclocked the 5770 can even challenge 460's in SLI at higher resolutions. Way better than the +200 the 460's would cost.
Oh im sorry, i was totally making stuff up like you.
If you go KILL the other user....you winShit I was reading down thinking this guy is on to something.. & if you throw ln2 on a 3870x2 it will smoke a 480
what does the rest of your build look like? I would probably go 6850 or gtx460 since they can had for much cheaper than the 6870. a small oc on either one and you will be getting 90-95% of the same performance for 50-70 bucks cheaper.I'm totally stuck on what to do. I'm building a new rig and need to decide on a GPU. I do not want a GTX 470 or 480, not interested in the heat and noise.
I'll be gaming at the native resolution of my screen which is 1920 x 1080. Would like to run the following games smoothly, all maxed out:
Crysis, Crysis Warhead
Stalker Complete, Stalker Clearsky Complete, Stalker Pripyat Complete
Mass Effect, Mass Effect 2
Fallout 3, Fallout New Vegas
I'm thinking a 6870 should do the trick? Thoughts?
price/performance the 6850 is the much better deal especially for those that oc. the 6850 and especially the gtx460 have much more headroom for additional performance.[H]'s review shows the 6870 handily beating the 1GB GTX 460 and it comes close to 5870 performance in other benchmarks. Some vendors have it for $239. You could probably find $230 or even $220 on sale. 6870 is a killer deal.
what does the rest of your build look like? I would probably go 6850 or gtx460 since they can had for much cheaper than the 6870. a small oc on either one and you will be getting 90-95% of the same performance for 50-70 bucks cheaper.
that is such a good system that I would see what the 6950/6970 cards have to offer. if you must buy now then I would go gtx460 1gb or 6850 and oc them a bit.CPU: Core i5 760
RAM: 8gb Corsair 1600 CL8
Mobo: Asus P7P55D-E Pro
PSU: Corsair HX650W
Yeah seriously battling to make a decision. I don't have a pc at the mo, just some old laptop, really killing me having to wait, there's gaming to be done!
Anyone who claims nvidia drivers are always better than ATI drivers clearly never owned an 8800 GTX during the early days of Vista. I spent $1400 for 2 of these cards and they were f***ing paperweights for 6 months.
yeah the first few months of Vista were horrible. I waited quite a while before getting Vista and even then many driver issues were still getting sorted out.Are you on crack?
I had 3 8800 GTX's on Vista, was fine. However, any problems you may of had were probably due to Vista itself.
In fact i recently came back to nVidia from ATi because of the drivers.
Are you on crack?
I had 3 8800 GTX's on Vista, was fine. However, any problems you may of had were probably due to Vista itself.
In fact i recently came back to nVidia from ATi because of the drivers.
well you could move to 7 without waiting on the first service pack. 7 is basically an improved version of Vista so it was actually almost perfect in beta. in fact when the beta and release candidates came out I used them just as much as Vista.Not one issue at all, it may of been because i didn't have Vista until the first service pack maybe? I never move OS before the first service pack. But seriously, not one issue with them, other than the fact one of the cards fans stopped working lol.
I never run the risk of using an operating system before it's first service pack, just my choice .
I guess i was in teh dark when this happened. Resolved now i take it?
At this point i was busy swearing at the bit shit called ATi HD4870 and why it crashed during several games because ATi (at the time) hadn't updated their drivers to make the games physically work it seems.
AMD (ATi) drivers on a whole have been a terrible experience, nVidia on the other hand i've never experienced issues with, the only time it would see there were driver issues i was too busy beating an AMD/ATi card with my face.