Sorry, no RTX2080 performance for $300 on Navi

Discussion in 'Video Cards' started by Stoly, May 21, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stoly

    Stoly [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,349
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
  2. Rvenger

    Rvenger [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,772
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2012
    Because the hype train media killed it. Not AMD.
     
  3. Brian_B

    Brian_B 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,310
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Well if you didn’t realize that AMD would have to price at similar performance levels to current nVidia pricing, you don’t understand how business works. So MSRPs are going to be higher than previous generations because nVidias are high. Maybe they won’t be “as high” as nVidia, but they certainly aren’t going to price a competitor to a $600+ card at $300 - the shareholders would revolt since they could price it at $450-500 and come up much better on profit, even with slightly lower sales.

    And even at that, competing with a 2070 is a good spot. Not a lot of folks outside of forums like this are popping for those $600+ cards anyway.

    Then if we get lucky and AMD does well, we get a price war between the two and prices fall after release.

    Also, I can’t speak for anyone else but I’m not concerned about hardware ray tracing in the least right now. It’s like being worried you don’t have Ageia PhysX hardware...
     
  4. Stoly

    Stoly [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,349
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Actually, both the RTX 2060 and 2070 are "cheaper" as of now. So hopefully the $399-$499 prices are not final.
     
  5. Gideon

    Gideon 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,299
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    jeffj7 likes this.
  6. N4CR

    N4CR 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,841
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    This. I never got on the Navi hype train. There is no way they are doing some 2080Ti/2080 killer on a small chip with ass-old GCN, and also why I pulled trigger on a $400 vega late last year.

    2070/2060 performance for $400 is already available in form of Vega though, but it costs a bit more to make.
     
  7. Armenius

    Armenius I Drive Myself to the [H]ospital

    Messages:
    18,571
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2014
    This is par for the course. Name a forthcoming AMD/ATi release that has never been killed due to the hype train in the past 12 years.
     
    Factum, Manny Calavera and 5150Joker like this.
  8. FrgMstr

    FrgMstr Just Plain Mean Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,339
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    Let's stay on the actual topic and keep the BS to ourselves so we stop destroying every AMD tech thread that is written. Thanks.
     
  9. XoR_

    XoR_ Gawd

    Messages:
    814
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2016
    Hype have nothing to do with failed AMD product launches

    This card by all means will be worse than NV offerings from previous generation and have terrible pricing of current NV generation so how could it not fail?
    AMD GPU division sucks (n)
     
  10. DooKey

    DooKey [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    8,102
    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    I'm not surprised at all OP. It is what it is.
     
  11. DejaWiz

    DejaWiz Oracle of Unfortunate Truths

    Messages:
    19,059
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    According to "https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/" ...isn't that site the China equivalent of WCCFtech when it comes to computers/electronics?

    Alas, I'm still interested in Navi XT/3080 to replace my aging 980Ti. We'll see soon enough!
     
  12. viivo

    viivo [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,294
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    But nobody really, seriously, honestly believed that AMD would release a $300/400 GPU near 2080 performance this or any of the next 5 years, right? Especially after the VII which is below that performance threshhold for the same price. Come on, people aren't that desperately deluded, right?
     
  13. Stoly

    Stoly [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,349
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    I guess they are... :rolleyes::rolleyes:
     
  14. DejaWiz

    DejaWiz Oracle of Unfortunate Truths

    Messages:
    19,059
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Keep in mind that R-VII uses very expensive 16GB of HBM2, which substantially drives the price per unit up, despite its performance vs the competition. Navi's GDDR6 will help keep costs down, which makes sense for these "new/rumored" $400 and $500 price points.

    Even if these are the confirmed price points, then that is going to make them a very attractive alternative to the more expensive 2070 and 2080.
    However: *if* Navi won't support DXR, then AMD will *also* be competing with their own RX series and nVidia's 1600 series, which currently tops out at around $300 for a 1660Ti.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2019
  15. Pieter3dnow

    Pieter3dnow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,789
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    The worst case of apples and oranges.

    Radeon VII is a die shrink of a compute card from last generation Instinct series. That card was or is not representative of anything in this matter since there was no consumer version more or less planned (driver problems at launch & cooler solution that does not scream we planned this very well).
    Radeon VII is a card with 16gb HBM2 that is the reason for the price.

    Actually the next few years will proof that AMD can do things and RTG should get enough for R&D (3 year cycle) to allow some progress, that you and many others already accepted that overpriced Nvidia hardware is your new norm does not mean that the rest of us have to accept it.
     
    {NG}Fidel and Maddness like this.
  16. Auer

    Auer Gawd

    Messages:
    765
    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2018
    81.2%. Nvidia's Market share. Right now the good folks at AMD are praying for another Crypto Mining Boon.

    Anyone who thinks AMD want's to lower prices for the dirty masses is a bit.....delusional...
     
  17. Stoly

    Stoly [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,349
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Well, the last few years have been proof that AMD can't do things. I really don't see that changing anytime soon. Hopefully I'll be proven wrong, but I think Intel has a better chance to go against nvidia than AMD.
     
  18. travm

    travm Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    354
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2016
    If the new mainstream GPU costs 300+, what goes on the $150 to $200 bracket?
    This does not bode well for me upgrading any time soon.

    Vegas off mining farms?
     
  19. viivo

    viivo [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,294
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2005
    funkydmunky likes this.
  20. Chimpee

    Chimpee [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,451
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2015
    RX580 since it is already at that price bracket.
     
    Maddness likes this.
  21. travm

    travm Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    354
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2016
    I already have a 580... What kind of an upgrade is that.
    Nevermind it's just a refreshed 480 from years gone by. I miss the days when the whole product stack would get updated. But that's been a long time gone I guess.
    Also, wasn't Navi supposed to replace the 580?
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2019
  22. pendragon1

    pendragon1 [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    13,923
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    didn't we know this a couple weeks ago?

    well, they EXPECT it to be. so if it isn't, AMD are a bunch of lying assholes, right?!
     
  23. ManofGod

    ManofGod [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    10,902
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2007
    I do not think we have anything to be concerned about. Navi will be what it will be, simple as that.
     
    Maddness and Gideon like this.
  24. harmattan

    harmattan [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,241
    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    I was yelling in the long-running navi post that pricing was going to be in line with nV, no way it was going to be less. I guess no one listens when you tell them the sky is blue.

    In any case, this is a crying shame. The price/performance needle hasn't budged for 2 years.
     
  25. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,511
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    RX 580, RX 590, RX 570, GTX 1660, 1650.. i'd say the 150-200 dollar price range is covered pretty nicely given how small of a gain most of the RTX and navi lineup ended up being.
     
    T4rd likes this.
  26. Brian_B

    Brian_B 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,310
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Well, back in the day, a new generation of cards meant that the performance/price ratio would get bumped up. You would have the odd gap in the product stack filled with a rebadge, but by and large you could purchase more performance per dollar.

    At least until recently. So sure... all that stuff is currently being serv d by current Polaris stuff, but we want to see if Navi can improve on that - that’s the point of a new generation. Whereas Turing largely crapped all over it - it did raise the bar for performance but did very little on the value side of that equation.
     
  27. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,511
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    those days are long gone.. we're no longer going to see those huge gains between generations anymore..
     
    Maddness likes this.
  28. XoR_

    XoR_ Gawd

    Messages:
    814
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2016
    And it looks Navi will do even less without even having anything to justify higher price.

    For example GTX 1080 owner would have some reason to get RTX 2070 but zero reasons to get NAVI
    I would understand something like 400$. Hell, even 450$ just to be a little cheaper but 500$? In this case they need to be hella lot faster than RTX 2070 in rasterization and this is not going to happen because Radeon VII siths in the middle of 2070 and 2080 and supposedly will be still the fastest AMD card...
     
  29. Pieter3dnow

    Pieter3dnow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,789
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    It is simple the gpu development takes about 3 years and 3 years ago AMD barely had enough funds to prioritize R&D for the gpu so you know when companies can do more and when they can't.

    You know Intel has money and people enough to do certain things but if it was so easy as you describe it here there would be tens of companies making GPU for gaming and you guessed it already there aren't.

    When you judge AMD on their GPU performance find out what their budget was for R&D 3 years ago and then compare with Nvidia then scratch your head about the comments you are making here.

    Too many people pretending that you can just make a gpu and because of whatever thought process is going on it will beat Nvidia , it does not work that way and I will spoil it for you it is not going to work that way either.
     
  30. Pieter3dnow

    Pieter3dnow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,789
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Anyone who thinks that overpriced Nvidia hardware is the new norm in pricing has been thoroughly brainwashed by Nvidia marketing apparatus.
     
    rgMekanic, {NG}Fidel, Motley and 4 others like this.
  31. jbc029

    jbc029 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    469
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    As a 1080 owner, what reason was there to get a 2070 again? The meh dlss support that you just have to "believe real hard" look better thsn resolution upscaling or the slideshow rtx effects? I forget which.

    Anf saying R7 sits between 2070 and 2080 is like saying V56 sits between 1070 and 1080. Technically true, but it's a lot closer to the latter than the former.
     
    {NG}Fidel, otg, N4CR and 3 others like this.
  32. travm

    travm Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    354
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2016
    What are the odds amd fabricated this leak just so that Lisa sui could hold up a card and say $199?
     
  33. Pieter3dnow

    Pieter3dnow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,789
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    But we are all getting fatigued by now from all of the stuff that is in the news/rumours.
    We have been hearing only good stuff from AMD so far and the timing is all wrong. Not sure if you have kids but trying telling them a year in advance on how special their Christmas gift will be ;) .

    That part where it keeps our attention span and the part where we keep hearing things is where we will drop off when the times comes to purchase the very special item we been hearing about for so long that it might not live up to expectations .........
     
  34. Stoly

    Stoly [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,349
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    I think both VEGA and R7 performance varies too much. Vega56 can beat a GTX1080 on a couple of games and lag behind a GTX1070 in others (I'd say it's more like trading blows with a GTX1070Ti), and R7 is slower than the RTX2070 in a few games but can come close to RTX2080Ti in some cases.
     
  35. Stoly

    Stoly [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,349
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    I recall Jensen holding the RTX2080Ti and saying it was $499 and everyone went berzerk. Then reality slapped us in the face. :D:D:rolleyes::rolleyes:
     
    sirmonkey1985 likes this.
  36. Mode13

    Mode13 Gawd

    Messages:
    653
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2018
    I'm getting pretty close to just grabbing another b stock 980Ti to go SLI and call it a year.

    The few games I do actually play seem to scale just fine with it to well above 2080 performance. Only thing holding me back is lack of freesync support and fear of microstutter, so maybe sell the 980 Ti and grab a 1080 Ti.

    Not that I'm saying navi is "bad". Just that I'm not paying these huge prices for the boosts I'll be getting. I'd imagine my 980 Ti @ 1500mhz isn't very far behind a 2060, which will also match the "3080 Pro". Anything above a 2070 is out of my range of willingness to buy.

    /random rant
     
  37. XoR_

    XoR_ Gawd

    Messages:
    814
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2016
    Are you seriously still complaining about RTX and DLSS at this point?
    Currently there is no reason to believe highest performing Navi to have anything to offer over eg. Vega 64 than slightly rasterization performance and still worse performance/power ratio than Nvidia cards from years ago.

    And personally I think Navi XT will have as much RTX 2070 performance as Radeon VII have RTX 2080 performance ... so it will be complete fail
     
  38. jbc029

    jbc029 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    469
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Aside from DLSS and RTX, *there is no reason to move to Turing*. At all.

    Regarding power consumption...I'm an enthusiast. My 850w PSU doesn't give a shit how much any single GPU pulls (unless I tried to power that new KP 2080ti). 225W or 350W...don't care.
     
    {NG}Fidel likes this.
  39. XoR_

    XoR_ Gawd

    Messages:
    814
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2016
    Fastest Turing card is faster than fastest Pascal card
    Fastest AMD card is on par with fastest Pascal card
    215065_relative-performance_2560-1440.png
    Of course depending on tests and resolution Radeon VII might move but if anything not by much and not necessarily in "faster" direction...
    Drivers did nothing to improve situation, at least relatively speaking.

    If Navi is supposed to be RTX 2070 competition then it must be the same damn core as Radeon VII have but with changed memory controller to cheaper GDDR6 (or HBM2 but only 8GB) which also means half the bandwidth and thus lower performance. Not very charismatic design...
    And again, if it is supposed to be RTX 2070 competition the same way Radeon VII is supposed to be RTX 2080 equal then it means Navi XT will be slower than RTX 2070 at rasterization... and if they add DXR support it will be true slideshow.

    Power consumption might not matter but all this "enthusiast" talk would make any sense if AMD was competing on high-end and just happen to have higher power consumption. As it is AMD release GCN based cards for 7 (fuc*king) years and each of them under-perform and have higher power consumption. Well, HD7970 was pretty good... until NV released GTX 680 that by chip designation was intended to be GTX 660 but because AMD underdelivered so badly they could get away with this move and even get almost universal praise for great card they released...

    All signs point to sad truth: this year is lost for AMD on GPU front. Some people will get these cards and will be even happy with them but they could as well get NV card and have all these seemingly useless features and less heat and less power bill.
    I really hope in the lab AMD is working hard on new GPU architecture that takes absolutely nothing from GCN because they were at this GCN bullshit for way too long already. NV never had architecture that stayed almost the same for that long. How is that even possible? Are they putting money from "swear jar" into R&D? ...wait, then GCN era would be over long time ago XD
     
    Factum and GoldenTiger like this.
  40. Stoly

    Stoly [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,349
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    I care. Less power comsumption means less heat, means cheaper PSU, more overclocking headroom while running cooler. And saving a few pesos on the powerbill.
     
    GoldenTiger and Manny Calavera like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.