So EVEN IF THERE IS NO CORROBORATING EVIDENCE. The lack of disclosed evidence (in this case we will call it Schrodinger's evidence because it both exists and doesn't exist until we see it.) means he is guilty.Because generally unless there's a public record like an arrest, anything else would be considered protected due to the person being a minor. The information that generally comes out after the fact is usually when the kid is either dead or people have leaked it while he's sitting in jail after having killed someone. Most of the time, you don't even get names when kids are involved in a lot of incidents.
edit: Have you ever even watched or read the news? "because the offender is a minor their name has not been released to the public" is pretty common, and usually when a child is a victim names get redacted without even making that statement.
If that is the case why is the president not in jail? His Schrodinger's evidence seems to be even MORE damning.
Why are you Not in jail? I could easily have Schrodinger's evidence against you.
or why am I not in jail for some Schrodinger's Evidence.
This reaction is either Knee Jerk or the police/agencies in question have credible evidence. Right now it seems very knee jerk and this kid is going to have to legally change his name to not be tied to this bullshit any more.