Scammers Blackmail YouTubers with Copyright Claims

Discussion in '[H]ard|OCP Front Page News' started by AlphaAtlas, Feb 8, 2019.

  1. AlphaAtlas

    AlphaAtlas [H]ard|Gawd Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,536
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Motherboard reports that some scammers are using YouTube's "three strikes" takedown policy to extort money from legitimate YouTube channels. While the larger profile of popular channels might offer some protection, smaller channels seem to be particularly exposed. The ~8000-subscriber "ObbyRaidz" and "Kenzo" gaming channels, for example, were hit with 2 strikes by someone calling themselves "VengefulFlame, and were threatened with a potentially damaging 3rd strike if they didn't pay a Bitcoin or PayPal ransom. While "suspicious" copyright violation claims supposedly have to be verified by human YouTube staff, apparently, VengefulFlame "complied with the company's request, and YouTube wrongly took down the videos."

    Automatic scans and manual takedown requests on YouTube often demonetize videos that use a second or two of copyrighted content in compliance with fair use laws, meaning money a creator would've made on the video is taken away, or diverted to the claimant. Sometimes, the video in question might contain no copyrighted material at all. Worse, creators say trying to get in touch with an actual human at the company to reverse the decision can be a nightmare. "I'm legitimately surprised it took this long" for scammers to start extorting channels, Katharine Trendacosta, a policy analyst at digital rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told Motherboard. "The system is set up to incentivize false reports, and it is so bad at catching them and punishing people for making false reports."
     
  2. NeghVar

    NeghVar 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,414
    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    I bet if filing a false DMCA/copyright claim became an enforced criminal offense and those who take down are considered an accomplice. Then Youtube would really be putting some work into verifying these claims before implementing sentence. Too bad.
     
  3. macksomerville

    macksomerville [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,963
    Joined:
    May 18, 2000
    Who cares about the little guys, they got Alt-right Trumpers to silence!
     
  4. Megaslug

    Megaslug Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    170
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2015
    That would help, I suppose. So would doing away with the completely useless DMCA and putting in place some actual reasonable copyright laws. Alas this too will never happen so long as Hollywood and the RIAA can lavish millions on Congresscritters.
     
  5. StryderxX

    StryderxX [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,066
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    If (A) YouTuber files a false claim against (B) YouTuber a strike should be charged to (A) YouTuber's account. That should get some of this under control in the interim.
     
    dvsman, AceGoober and NeghVar like this.
  6. bartz118

    bartz118 n00b

    Messages:
    6
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    FYI - The link is missing the colon after HTTPS
     
    AlphaAtlas likes this.
  7. tetris42

    tetris42 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,429
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    But then large media conglomerates wouldn't be allowed to do whatever they want.
     
    captaindiptoad and Darunion like this.
  8. kju1

    kju1 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,142
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2002
    Just wait until I get my copyright on cat videos....I will END youtube! muwahahaha.
     
  9. Morphish

    Morphish n00b

    Messages:
    39
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    That's the issue, though. These are NOT DMCA takedowns. This is Youtube's own process that they use in order to avoid having to mess with DMCA issues. If they used the DMCA, there would be penalties for fraudulent takedown notices. But since this is their proprietary system, they get to manage everything without recourse to the courts. No creator "owns" the hosting of their video on Youtube - Youtube as a private company decides to host or not to host (and who gets any share of the advertising dollars) based on their interpretation of their ToS. DMCA takedowns would only be issued if the creator of the videos self-hosted their content.
     
    dvsman and AlphaFox like this.
  10. STEvil

    STEvil 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,796
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2000
    Dont have to be on youtube to issue a takedown. It can be done anonymously.
     
  11. harbingerofdoom

    harbingerofdoom Gawd

    Messages:
    710
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    yes because illegal and immoral activity is just peachy-keen so long as its only used against those YOU disagree with.


    just stop ... you're part of the probelm and not helping .... even if you are just making a joke.
     
    Blown Cap likes this.
  12. umeng2002

    umeng2002 Gawd

    Messages:
    898
    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Blame YouTube for being spineless. As bad as the DCMA is, this squarely on YouTube putting large media companies ahead of it's users.
     
  13. Darunion

    Darunion 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,498
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2010
    Its fear and financial. The users can't tie them up in court costs and paperwork, the media companies can. It is easier and cheaper to let them be bullied as opposed to paying a large staff to investigate every single claim for validity. Is it right? No. But I understand sadly :(
     
  14. PaulP

    PaulP Gawd

    Messages:
    761
    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2016
    As soon as they got the ransom demand, they should have forwarded it onto youtube. Of course, that is assuming that youtube channel owners have some way of reporting such things to youtube. I would hope they do, but I don't know.
     
  15. 1Nocturnal101

    1Nocturnal101 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    440
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    Many YouTubers like Gopher has had issues with music in games where scamming firms put takedown notices when they don't even have a copyright on the material used even if it is legitimately fair use.
     
  16. 1Nocturnal101

    1Nocturnal101 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    440
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2015
    Fraud and rackateering charges, screw civil court, and screw YouTube take evidence to the DAs office and press charges no lawyer needed. YouTube will have to comply thus repealing the monetization issue.
     
  17. Kyle_Bennett

    Kyle_Bennett Editor-in-Chief HardOCP Staff Member

    Messages:
    51,876
    Joined:
    May 18, 1997
    Got one of those this week for a TIM video.
     
  18. Nobu

    Nobu 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,543
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Is this not literally extortion? And since it's across state lines, a federal offense?