Zepher
[H]ipster Replacement
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2001
- Messages
- 20,728
check out this beast, 55" 4K gaming screen that can go portrait mode,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why not? I've sat 3' away from 40, 43, 48, and 49" displays. It's been fine. It fills my peripheral vision and the text is large enough that I don't need font scaling.1000R? They really expect you to sit only 1m away from a monitor that big?
Exactly this! I have a 43" that my eyes are about 26" away from and it is just right. There is no "one size fits all" - everyone has their own preference.Why not? I've sat 3' away from 40, 43, 48, and 49" displays. It's been fine. It fills my peripheral vision and the text is large enough that I don't need font scaling.
Sure, but 55 inches? Wouldn't a 38" ultrawide be more appropriate for a desk?Samsung keeps marketing this in portrait mode, which is a gimmick and stupid, but this thing in landscape mode could be a game changer. Its an ultrawide with more vertical space, which many many people have been clamoring for.
I've got a 50" QN94A on my desk. Appropriate? I don't know, but I love it for work and gaming.Sure, but 55 inches? Wouldn't a 38" ultrawide be more appropriate for a desk?
Sure, but 55 inches? Wouldn't a 38" ultrawide be more appropriate for a desk?
I have a CX 55" on my desk and love it for games.I've got a 50" QN94A on my desk. Appropriate? I don't know, but I love it for work and gaming.
Not enough PPISamsung keeps marketing this in portrait mode, which is a gimmick and stupid, but this thing in landscape mode could be a game changer. Its an ultrawide with more vertical space, which many many people have been clamoring for.
Ironic considering your user name.55" is too large for a monitor. The image is too tall, and looking up is uncomfortable.
Yeah, it's not ideal, but I know from experience I can live with it. And again, distance matters. In fact, I'll probably be using some scaling in the OS or browser.Also, the pixel density is too low with a 4K resolution on that size panel - text looks rough. Needs 8K.
Ironic considering your user name.I have been using one of the 27" monitors at work in portrait mode an am comfortable with it. Distance is also an important factor, I am planning on about 0.8 m from my eyes. Still, putting it as far down as it goes and angling it up will probably be a must.
Yeah, it's not ideal, but I know from experience I can live with it. And again, distance matters. In fact, I'll probably be using some scaling in the OS or browser.
That seems to be how Samsung curved displays are. The CRG9 seems to be an exception but it has much less curve so it at least looks more uniform to my eyes.Is it a general thing with curved monitors that the center is curved and the sides flatten out? That's definitely how it appears in the pictures of this one.
I don't really have experience with curved panels but seeing as my work relies on straight lines I really don't like the idea of them and this apparent mix of curved and flat seems even worse.
Is it a general thing with curved monitors that the center is curved and the sides flatten out? That's definitely how it appears in the pictures of this one.
I don't really have experience with curved panels but seeing as my work relies on straight lines I really don't like the idea of them and this apparent mix of curved and flat seems even worse.
Yeah, the biggest reason I've never used one. I don't have a separate rig for work and gaming (unless you count the Steam Deck) so I've always needed a do-it-all flat display. The only time I'd be tempted by curved panels is if I ever build myself a racing sim rig.If you need straight lines for work then you wouldn't want any sort of curve period.
My only question:
Who asked for this? It's awesome, sure. but... why?
Linus has a somewhat crappy video of it up right now. He says the display cannot do multiple HDMI inputs split screen! Come on, that was the only way this would make sense!
Most likely simply cost of development. This is by all means just a repackaged TV.Yeah this is the most odd oversight, how could they not add this feature?