Samsung Confirms the Note 7 Is Coming Back as a Refurbished Device

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Mar 28, 2017.

  1. Megalith

    Megalith 24-bit/48kHz Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,004
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    The Note 7 just refuses to die: Samsung has announced that the device will be re-sold in specific countries, probably with a smaller battery and possibly under a different name. I think there is some risk here of another incident, but the decision does make sense to some degree—aside from the battery, practically all of the other components that comprise the Note 7 are perfectly usable, so it would be a severe waste to just trash all 4.3 million recalled devices.

    …the company has released a statement regarding its plans to recycle Note 7 devices. The process comes in three parts: save salvageable components such as camera modules and semiconductors, extract metal parts with the help from “eco-friendly” third-party companies, and sell refurbished devices “where applicable.” The announcement appears to walk back on what Samsung initially pledged last fall, when it said it would dispose of the Note 7 and had no plans to repair or refurbish them. Instead, Samsung has confirmed it will work with local authorities and carriers to sell it as a refurbished device, rumored to come with a smaller battery to prevent it from overheating and catching fire.
     
  2. RealBeast

    RealBeast Gawd

    Messages:
    648
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Refurbished C4, I mean Note 7. Since the airlines are still banning them it might take some explaining. :eek:
     
    qbanb8582 and RogueTadhg like this.
  3. chenw

    chenw 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,977
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2014
    something tells me that it'd be hilarious/disastrous if the root problem turned out to not be the battery but something else.

    But I think SS knows better and have already gone through rigorous testing to check for any potential flaws.

    Still, I will most likely treat this as a refurbished device, IE avoid at all costs.
     
  4. Paladin21

    Paladin21 Gawd

    Messages:
    529
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    If I could ship one in with a fixed battery for super-cheap, I'd probably do so. I'm basing this on the assumption that they're going to dump these in emerging markets for somewhere barely north of the component value of the phones. Given the choice between a "refurb" Note 7 with the additional functionality of the Note series and other phones likely to be in the same price range, it seems like a good deal.
     
  5. Dekoth-E-

    Dekoth-E- [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,600
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    They already released the investigation notes..it was the battery. The battery had a defect that combined with a space with no room for expansion basically made the device a failure waiting to happen. For that matter it is always the battery, there hasn't been a single instance of phones exploding that it wasn't the battery. This is why some of us are adamantly opposed to non removable battery designs. Not to mention the laundry list of other reasons why it is a terrible design.
     
    Master_shake_ likes this.
  6. azuza001

    azuza001 Gawd

    Messages:
    692
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Not going to be sold in the US is what I read. Good luck to them but not a chance that I would buy it.
     
  7. Gigus Fire

    Gigus Fire 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,275
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Then why not just replace the battery with ones that weren't defective?
     
  8. chenw

    chenw 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,977
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2014
    I am well aware that the Battery is the thing that explodes, there is literally nothing else in that phone capable of exploding in such a fashion.

    Even with the investigation, a lot of people also expect the battery to also be the CAUSE of the explosions.

    I am not entirely sure of it, I am a bit more open to something causing the battery to explode. Saying the battery design is flawed and it was a disaster waiting to happen is a bit too convenient, that design should have never left the drawing board in the first place.
     
  9. Master_shake_

    Master_shake_ [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,220
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    because they already had a stigma for being blowy-uppy.

    so recalling all phones and refurbishing them means there are no phones in captivity that still have the blowy-uppy battery.

    they'll still have the stigma and still won't be allowed on planes or anything so....
     
  10. Jarod888

    Jarod888 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,330
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    If you could pick one up super cheap, root it, disable the cell signal you could have an awesome mp3 player.
     
  11. Gigus Fire

    Gigus Fire 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,275
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    But i could take the battery and put it in a different samsung and still get the same blowing up effects.
     
  12. Master_shake_

    Master_shake_ [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,220
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    well if the battery had room to expand in a different samsung then no it would have been fine.
     
  13. ir0nw0lf

    ir0nw0lf [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,257
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    They need to rename this phone to "The Phoenix." Explanation is pretty self-explanatory. :LOL:
     
    xmadror likes this.
  14. Dekoth-E-

    Dekoth-E- [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,600
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    The actual investigation pointed out a specific flaw in the battery that was a result of the manufacturing process of the battery. Did you not read it? It was really damn clear.
     
    Darunion likes this.
  15. illli

    illli [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,206
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    They'll probably sell them in places that have no consumer protection laws. Just in case they blow up again
     
  16. Bandalo

    Bandalo 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,660
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    If they made these dirt cheap, I'd buy one. I'm assuming Samsung wouldn't dare re-release these unless they were sure the battery issue was completed fixed. From what I hear it was a pretty nice phone other than the one rather serious issue.
     
  17. yadnom

    yadnom Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    349
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    They tried but the replacement batteries also blew up so they decided to just pull/recall the phone. If I remember correctly from reading, Samsung used two battery suppliers for the Note 7. The original battery issues were supposed to be limited to one supplier's batteries but when replacement batteries also started to blow up, they decided to recall/stop sale of the device rather than wait for the full investigation. I think it turned out that during the rush to make replacement batteries/phones from the second supplier, there was a defect with the new batteries as well.

    Edit: This explains it pretty well. "Samsung is saying that the issue with the first batteries was a design flaw and the one with the second batteries was a manufacturing defect."
    http://tech.firstpost.com/news-anal...ng-phones-has-finally-been-solved-358635.html
     
  18. fadedlogic

    fadedlogic Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    278
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2016
    this seems like a TERRIBLE waste of resources after an absolute disaster of a roll out.

    Why would you distract from the roll out of the Galaxy S8, which appears to be an awesome phone; self-sabotaging decisions.
    [​IMG]
     
    tjmagneto and scojer like this.
  19. Bandalo

    Bandalo 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,660
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    It's not a waste of resources. Those were already wasted with their warehouses full of returned and unsold Note 7s. This is them trying to recover SOME of those losses. They're not complete idiots, they wouldn't release these to ANY market if they hadn't corrected the problem. The only reason they're not releasing them again in ALL markets is because the name has been tainted and they'd have huge marketing issues almost anywhere.
     
  20. oldmanbal

    oldmanbal [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,037
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Man goes to jail for sending a 'seizure inducing tweet' but samsung can sell exploding phones at no recourse. . .amazing.
     
  21. sir-gold

    sir-gold Gawd

    Messages:
    931
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Presumably it will have different firmware to avoid the bricking of existing note 7s, what is to stop someone from copying this "safe" rom onto an original note 7?
     
  22. Master_shake_

    Master_shake_ [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,220
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    apples and oranges are different.

    one was intentionally used the other wasn't malice.
     
  23. fadedlogic

    fadedlogic Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    278
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2016
    I'm not talking the physical phones; write them off, I'm sure they have insurance for completed operations. I'm talking about burying that terrible chapter as deep as they can and focus on the new product line. Wasted resources would be trying to re-market the Note 7 and possibly tainting the new Galazy S8. If one of them has and issue, it would be catastrophic, why risk that?
     
  24. Bandalo

    Bandalo 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,660
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    I don't know if they have insurance to replace an entire product line. Twice. That's a lot of material and R&D down the drain.

    The risk is why they won't re-sell them in any of the major markets. That being said, I'd still buy one if it was possible.
     
  25. DPI

    DPI Nitpick Police

    Messages:
    10,955
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    So would a lot of people. And much as I love my Nexus 6P, when I got to use a friend's Note 7 briefly I was pretty amazed at how powerful and polished the thing was.

    And much to the disappointment of closet android-haters that hoped this recall would spell doom for Samsung or somehow cast a shadow on Android as a platform, If they sold a revised Note 7 at a discount with a new battery, they'd sell out of them.
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2017
  26. Mike89

    Mike89 Gawd

    Messages:
    702
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2003
    I'd buy one in a minute if the price was right. Nothing wrong with that phone but the batteries that were being used.
     
  27. JohnnyGatt

    JohnnyGatt GamingFace

    Messages:
    106
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    I picked up a new phone last week and as I wanted expandable memory the pixel was out the sales rep in the store (Australia's largest phone service provider Telstra) did not even want to show me Samsung and joked about the exploding range of phones. I got Sony Xperia XZ its OK. But when I was doing the paperwork I watched 2 other reps do the same thing and the guy next to me who wanted his Samsung was told about all the problems with warranty. They where pushing Apple, Sony, LG, and Pixels. 12 months ago all they wanted to sell was Samsung.
     
  28. DPI

    DPI Nitpick Police

    Messages:
    10,955
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    Anecdotal, but sounds like you're assuming personal preference is biasing them, when in reality it probably has more to do with incentives or margins - a better commission on whatever they're pushing.
     
  29. BloodDonor

    BloodDonor Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    315
    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2009
    I dont care if its 2mm thicker, give me a decent phone with a 5000 mAh battery please...
     
    fadedlogic likes this.
  30. kandrey89

    kandrey89 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    183
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2015
    My Note 7 screen was amazing.

    I agree, make the phone 1.5 mm thicker, make it 5000mAh, I'm good with it.
     
  31. Mohonri

    Mohonri [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,734
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Yeah, price it right, and even *I*, who hates big screen phones, might pick it up.

    I wonder if Samsung will only sell to non-US markets because they don't want to cannibalize their S8 sales on launch. I'd be willing to bet a lot of US consumers would be perfectly happy with a "refurbished but actually like new" Note 7.
     
  32. chenw

    chenw 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,977
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2014
    I read it, the report is basically showing how the battery failed, which is EXACTLY my point, the report didn't go deep enough.

    It never went into WHY that design was EVER approved of in the first place. That entire report is basically ALL batteries and never investigated whether the OS or management has anything to do with it (IE if the phone was replaced with a non-faulty battery, stress test the hell out of it nor why the design was approved of in the first place).

    No accidents happen by having 1 singular cause, that report is basically cutting the chain in 1 place only, where to properly prevent stuff like this happening again, the chain would have to be cut entirely.

    I am more astounded at the fact that they allowed this sort of design to happen than I am having batteries exploding.

    If management methods has not changed in SS, I am going to bet that something like this will happen again.
     
  33. a104375

    a104375 [H]Lite

    Messages:
    119
    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    How did the push to get the stragglers to give their phone back that started around new years where they were disabling charging and what not? Do they finally have 100% back 99%?