DooKey
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2001
- Messages
- 13,843
At this point, I'm all for some competition. Nvidia has held a GPU monopoly for far too long!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At this point, I'm all for some competition. Nvidia has held a GPU monopoly for far too long!
I think most here echo my sentiments that Nvidia has had very little competition and that lack of rivalry leads to development stagnation and high prices. I used the term "monopoly" loosely, but it fits for me since there hasn't been an attractive contender for my dollars since I owned a 3dfx Voodoo card in 1998. Sure, I've owned a couple Radeon cards since then, but I've always gone back to Nvidia because they offer the best performance. If there's a chance that Intel can put some pressure on them, I'm here for it!
That would be 4090 bandwidth (just al ittle more) in the xx80, it could make for this generation 256 bits "ok" and not limiting, if the performance are 4090 ishh.Wccftech’s report also points to a more powerful RTX 5080 than expected. The unannounced GPU will reportedly have a 32Gbps memory speed instead of the rumored 28Gbps and a maximum bandwidth of 1024GB/s instead of the 896GB/s that was rumored.
I feel this could be a trap for Nvidia, it would be a big deception for it to no have some DLSS 4 or some other buzz word new tech like in vram AI texture system or some other asset generation, dynamic and up to 3 generated frame by frame that let people use 240 hz monitor with their new open spec g-sync hardware but do not use them if the frame rate is naturally high enough, just when it drops, with a lesser hit on latency because of better reflex chain or something.Wccftech says Nvidia’s CES keynote will also focus on next-generation AI technologies for gaming with a “major surprise” expected.
I think most here echo my sentiments that Nvidia has had very little competition and that lack of rivalry leads to development stagnation and high prices. I used the term "monopoly" loosely, but it fits for me since there hasn't been an attractive contender for my dollars since I owned a 3dfx Voodoo card in 1998. Sure, I've owned a couple Radeon cards since then, but I've always gone back to Nvidia because they offer the best performance. If there's a chance that Intel can put some pressure on them, I'm here for it!
What development stagnation? Seriously, NV had pushed graphics forward unlike anyone else in the industry. It's their fault that they are the undisputed leader in graphics I guess..,.I think most here echo my sentiments that Nvidia has had very little competition and that lack of rivalry leads to development stagnation and high prices. I used the term "monopoly" loosely, but it fits for me since there hasn't been an attractive contender for my dollars since I owned a 3dfx Voodoo card in 1998. Sure, I've owned a couple Radeon cards since then, but I've always gone back to Nvidia because they offer the best performance. If there's a chance that Intel can put some pressure on them, I'm here for it!
What development stagnation? Seriously, NV had pushed graphics forward unlike anyone else in the industry. It's their fault that they are the undisputed leader in graphics I guess..,.
R&D budget going into GPU and their part is indeed giant.What development stagnation? Seriously, NV had pushed graphics forward unlike anyone else in the industry. It's their fault that they are the undisputed leader in graphics I guess..,.
Rumors are significantly below the full chip too (which could be a giant ~750mm affair considering core count versus the rumoured die-size and core count of the 5070-5080), seem like the exact 4090 gameplan.I can't remember the last time nvidia when right out the gate with a new arch, a new node, and a full fat core chip, top gaming offering on day 1. They haven't really had to since AMD bought ATI.
Specially with the gddr7 upgrade giving already a nice bandwith boost, but not sure about exact same considering the importance of bandwith for AI task , 32gb-512 bits could make them quite the AI card and that 512 bit memory controller could have been a decision made for the B40/rtx 6000 and will be already there, the question being is it disabled to make cheaper PCB.They could a 448bit version for whatever they plan to charge for this 512bit version and sell the exact same.
I doubt scalpers will be needed to sell these at $3000, Nvidia will do that themselves. a $2500 MSRP means that Asus will make their watercooled super-ultra badass overclocked (by 10Mhz) dick-sucking big-tiddied RGB mega edition for like $3599These cards are going to get the usual "oh there is short supply and supply chain issues"
You know it's going to happen. Cards will be released. Scalpers will buy all of them and they will go for 3k plus even more.
Gonna be the same crap all over again. You just know they are chomping at the bit to release the supply chain horseshit again. The first 6 months these will be flying unicorn elephants.
Good luck.
What Nvidia as possibly to gain by not having just the most card as they can make there.... it is not like they can sell them higher than MSRP later on...
If there is more demand than supply there will be a shortage, that not something people say.
I'm ready for Out of Stock for weeks.It's just my opinion. Take it with a grain of salt. My opinion is there will be a shortage and supply issues. That is it. My opinion only.
A company the size of nvidia should be able to meet demand, no matter what people say. My opinion again. At their worth, there should be no shortage whatsoever considering how much money they have. My opinion.
They can't forecast exact demand, and don't want to end up with overstock.It's just my opinion. Take it with a grain of salt. My opinion is there will be a shortage and supply issues. That is it. My opinion only.
A company the size of nvidia should be able to meet demand, no matter what people say. My opinion again. At their worth, there should be no shortage whatsoever considering how much money they have. My opinion.
They can forecast demand enough to not end up with overstock. They are far from oh we stupid. Regardless overstock would be nice so that people could actually buy their shit at non ass rape prices.They can't forecast exact demand, and don't want to end up with overstock.
Not really caring about the gaming market and using the fab time to fill the back order of AI cards that are back ordered a year out.What Nvidia as possibly to gain by not having just the most card as they can make there.... it is not like they can sell them higher than MSRP later on...
If there is more demand than supply there will be a shortage, that not something people say, that something that it is.
384b = 24GBI'm still having a hard time believing the 5090 really will be 512bit 32GB. Just seems so crazy when it doesn't need to be. They could a 448bit version for whatever they plan to charge for this 512bit version and sell the exact same. Hell, even a 384bit version would.
I can't remember the last time nvidia when right out the gate with a new arch, a new node, and a full fat core chip, top gaming offering on day 1. They haven't really had to since AMD bought ATI.
These chips are going to be very expensive to make, so why not roll out with a cheaper to make slightly cut down version, sell for same in the face of ZERO competition and make more profit? At the very least you could release both with a 6 month refresh for the top tier part coming later.
The backorder of enterprise Blackwell is due to the issue with TSMC's CoWoS-L packaging for its MCM design that has been posted about many times here. Gaming Blackwell is monolithic and not being produced on the same fabs. Issues with one should not affect the other.Not really caring about the gaming market and using the fab time to fill the back order of AI cards that are back ordered a year out.
Lol. Riiiiight. "Just" an 841mm2 chip you say? Also, that chart says that's the number of pins, not dimensions . I think.@Olrak29_ revealed in an X post that the AMD Navi 44 "RDNA 4" GPU will have a package size of just 29 x 29 mm as mentioned in the NBD.LTD shipping manifestos.
View attachment 685866
Was going to say. The die in the 4090 is something like 24mm x 25mm.Lol. Riiiiight. "Just" an 841mm2 chip you say? Also, that chart says that's the number of pins, not dimensions .
Could the test gig be larger than a gpu die, cover the vram or other part of the pcb, if it look like google image result for test jig block, they seem bigger than the die you put in them.will have a package size of just 29 x 29 mm
Buy the AMD competitor to the 5090...They can forecast demand enough to not end up with overstock. They are far from oh we stupid. Regardless overstock would be nice so that people could actually buy their shit at non ass rape prices.
I personally believe it's simply a cashgrab. Nothing more.
But regardless. We all have personal opinions about the matter.
Could the test gig be larger than a gpu die, cover the vram or other part of the pcb, if it look like google image result for test jig block, they seem bigger than the die you put in them.
the pins count would it not be 1137 if it is a 1137 BGA ?, maybe that the pin count and the 0.773 would tell us the die size, according to gpt, 250mm die max.... to be expected with those values.
Lol. Riiiiight. "Just" an 841mm2 chip you say? Also, that chart says that's the number of pins, not dimensions . I think.
Is there a difference between die size & package size ?Was going to say. The die in the 4090 is something like 24mm x 25mm.
Yes. The die is normally encased in a plastic or ceramic package. Think chip on a board or dimm here, not CPU package with a PCB and heat spreader.Is there a difference between die size & package size ?
Yes sir.
package is the whole gra or green square and the gpu die the black one in the middle ?
AMD Ryzen AI MAX 300 "Strix Halo" APU Lineup:
SKU Name Architectures CPU Cores GPU Cores TDP Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 16 / 32 40 CUs (Radeon 8060S) 55-130W Ryzen AI Max 390 Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 12 / 24 40 CUs (Radeon 8060S) 55-130W Ryzen AI Max 385 Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 8 / 16 32 CUs (Radeon 8050S) 55-130W Ryzen AI Max 380 Zen 5 / RDNA 3.5 6 / 12 16 CUs (Radeon 8XXXS) 55-130W
https://wccftech.com/amd-mobile-cpu...alo-fire-range-krackan-radeon-rx-8000-series/
View attachment 690812
What are they going to do about memory bandwidth for it? Desktop 4070 is 504GB/s, 7700XT is 432 and 7800XT is 624. DDR5-6000 dual channel is a mere 96GB/s. Sure they could use faster ram so that's just an example, but they're going to need a lot more mem bandwidth than a typical dual channel DDR5 setup can offer to match a 4070.Strix Halo at 130w, if that's true and rumored performance around 4070, might as well get a low power 4070.
But if it's around or faster than 4070 (full power) then it might be of interest, especially for that unified ram.
Strix Halo is rumored to up the memory bus to 256-bit LPDDR5X 8533. That's still "only" good for 273GB/s though so I guess the cache is gonna be doing some heavy lifting (there's rumored to be additional cache for the iGPU, unclear if shared L4 or something separate)What are they going to do about memory bandwidth for it? Desktop 4070 is 504GB/s, 7700XT is 432 and 7800XT is 624. DDR5-6000 dual channel is a mere 96GB/s. Sure they could use faster ram so that's just an example, but they're going to need a lot more mem bandwidth than a typical dual channel DDR5 setup can offer to match a 4070.
That could work. Might not quite catch a 4070, but would help a lot. That's kind of like what Intel did with Lunar Lake. 8533 in the SoC package to keep up with and often beat AMD's APUs. Intel does 8533 and AMD replies with twice as much. Wish they'd give us a 256-bit bus on desktop chips.Strix Halo is rumored to up the memory bus to 256-bit LPDDR5X 8533. That's still "only" good for 273GB/s though so I guess the cache is gonna be doing some heavy lifting (there's rumored to be additional cache for the iGPU, unclear if shared L4 or something separate)