Axehandler
Gawd
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 635
So.... humm.. can I flash a 1070 to a 1080?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Poe's law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaSorry I couldnt find the sarcasm button, you'd think you could have seen that in my post.
What he said, this is no blunder nor is it free memory. These cards didn't meet the specs for the 8gb version or weren't stable, so they are sold with a BIOS which makes them more stable but perform a bit less. It makes more sense to sell them cheaper than throwing them away.They likely failed the QA for 8GB, but passed for 4GB. Cheaper to just flash it as a 4GB model.
Same reason some of the processors could get a free core years ago (X3 to 4).
Reminds me of the business model for computer printers. Pay more for a firmware that enables faster printing speed!
I thought you could pretty much just not solder down the extra chips and that's literally all you would need to do besides the BIOS? That's why you see some low end devices with the pads laid out for extra chips right? Are you telling me AMD is so pathetic they cant even get someone at the factory to reprogram the machine to not lay down the 4 extra chips and save that cost? Did they forget to spec the 4GB model until the last minute? There really is no explanation besides incompetence or laziness.
Oh wow. This sort of reminds me of when you could unlock the 6970 shaders on the ATI 6950's. AMD going old school again.
I'm pretry sure the story goes that AMD didn't have time to manufacture two different boards, but it NEEDED to have 4GB cards within the launch window or else everyone and their dog would call AMD out on falsely advertising the '$199' price. So they just firmware flashed the 8GB cards to not see half the RAM.
AMD should just price the 8GB cards to $200 already. What were they thinking? Also, for the first time you can now literally download more ram.
They most likely need the 8 memory chips for bandwidth. If they're 32-bit each, then you need 8 for 256-bit. The disabled memory was probably to increase the value of the 8GB model. I can't think of any other reason? If the memory controller was defective, then why is it still 32-bit? I doubt you can have defective memory chips and disable half of each chip.I thought you could pretty much just not solder down the extra chips and that's literally all you would need to do besides the BIOS? That's why you see some low end devices with the pads laid out for extra chips right? Are you telling me AMD is so pathetic they cant even get someone at the factory to reprogram the machine to not lay down the 4 extra chips and save that cost? Did they forget to spec the 4GB model until the last minute? There really is no explanation besides incompetence or laziness.
I would SO download a car. Yes I would.Yeah, but you wouldn't download a car.
I might have to see if I can find a 4gb card local to play with. Reminds me of my 9500 flashed to a 9700 and my x800 pro flashed to a x800 xt.
Nah, fuck it. I have a 1070, I'll wait for Vega.
I'm pretry sure the story goes that AMD didn't have time to manufacture two different boards, but it NEEDED to have 4GB cards within the launch window or else everyone and their dog would call AMD out on falsely advertising the '$199' price. So they just firmware flashed the 8GB cards to not see half the RAM.
AMD is probably loosing money on each 4GB card sold, or its barely breaking even. I dont think this 'free 4GB givaway' is going to last long at all.
I would SO download a car. Yes I would.
Hirens.is there a tool to test memory on VGAs?: maybe some of those 4gb were 8GB with failed memory chips?
is there a tool to test memory on VGAs?: maybe some of those 4gb were 8GB with failed memory chips?
Haven't you heard? The 1060 is 10% faster than the RX 480 in FireStrike! NVIDIA WINS! Eat that AMD losers! Wait, that's the 6GB card, and that costs $280? That's not even DX12? FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUU...............>>>>>>>>!!!!I seriously cannot believe the nVidia fans drooling over and over on this thread.
"pathetic", "losing money", "pure fail".
Jesus.
nVidia ass kissers.
nVidoa fucks you over with less ram than advertized and you make excuses for them.
AMD gives you MORE ram and you bitch about it.
Not that any of you would have bought it, you're too blindly loyal to nVidia and it shows.
You are the type of guys making excuses for dating the Bailey Jays out there.
That's my assumption as well. They either failed validation for 8GB capacity or they failed at the faster memory speeds specced for the 8GB model.They likely failed the QA for 8GB, but passed for 4GB. Cheaper to just flash it as a 4GB model.
Same reason some of the processors could get a free core years ago (X3 to 4).
Ok, how many of you RX 480 4GB owners have actaully done this? I was reading reports that this was only for the models sent to reviewers, but if we're actually seeing this abundantly in the wild, I may pick up a 4GB RX 480 for my dad sooner rather than later.
This is a pissibolity.They likely failed the QA for 8GB, but passed for 4GB. Cheaper to just flash it as a 4GB model.
^ LOL
No way, they literally spent more on the 4GB model by leaving the 8GB of vram and adding a sticker. This is awesome.
You don't get it, and it's obvious.How can they be unhappy if they got what they paid for? More air is needed.