I have a 780 ti..
Do you have a Kepler card that you could test 4k at 60hz.
I hope this works http://www.anandtech.com/show/8191/nvidia-kepler-cards-get-hdmi-4k60hz-support-kind-of
![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Quasar 42" 4K 60hz with HDMI 2
- Thread starter pbassjunk
- Start date
I have a 780 ti..
Do you have a Kepler card that you could test 4k at 60hz.
I hope this works http://www.anandtech.com/show/8191/nvidia-kepler-cards-get-hdmi-4k60hz-support-kind-of
Its actually not that bad. I think I might put up with it till something better comes along. It only set me back $330. The worst part that I notice is the cursor bracket is missing its middle bar.
Take some quick shots of it in games/windows.
No I dont. Sorry
So far pretty good. Im about 1.5 years behind though on games. Im currently play BF4 and Batman Arkham Origins. Both play well at 4k.
Only time I noticed mouse lag was when I first hooked this thing up and it did 4K at 30Hz. After making the switch manually in the Nividia control panel to 60hz the mouse lag went away.
How can I check whether is 4:2:2 or 4:2:0
I can tell you Ive been tweaking the nvidia color controls and the TVs to better the artifacts. Its really not that bad now.
Try this test image.
http://www.abload.de/img/chroma-large-29ooi6.png
If 4:4:4, both 4:2:2 and 4:4:4 should be clearly readable, like this -
Maybe try one of the test images? (mystieus beat me to it
)Its supposed to show 4:2:2 clearly or no clear image for 4:2:0.
-PG
Try this test image.
http://www.abload.de/img/chroma-large-29ooi6.png
If 4:4:4, both 4:2:2 and 4:4:4 should be clearly readable, like this -
Weird, I can see both in that image.
Have you had a 4k display before? If not does it bring a new dimension to Movies and Gaming?
There are a few 4k shows on netflix.
This is my first 4K display. I havent tried Netflix yet but for gaming Im not sure I can now go back to my 32" BenQ I was using before.
Ill see if I have the time to do that. I can tell you that the Quasar looks exactly like the Polaroid set posted earlier in this thread. Wonder if they are the same?
Ive decided to keep the Quasar as a monitor. After a few tweaks to the Nvidia color panel Im happy with its output results.
I changed the color setting to "desktop applications" and turned down the digital vibrance a bit. There are some tweaks yet that I have yet to try with the TVs color settings.
bsbllclown
Weaksauce
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2011
- Messages
- 67
How do these monitors look when you set them to 1080P for gaming? I only have a 280X so thats not gonna be enough to push 4K gaming. But i'd love to check these out for 4K desktop and 1080P gaming.
Thank you.
I am interested in this or 1440p as well. Really would like to see a pic of how it looks while running various applications.
SixFootDuo
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2004
- Messages
- 5,825
So 4:4:4 chroma works on the Polaroid?
Doubtful, I actually want to see how they look though just in case.
Another difference should be the Quasar is Edge-lit while the Polaroid is Direct-lit.
Where does it say the Quasar is edge lit?
You're right, I got it mixed up with Seiki. So these are the exact same Displays(Quasar/Polaroid)
Setting mine up now - decided to do a fresh windows install. Pretty impressive so far.
Couple of things:
- Pretty impressive out the box - haven't tried configuring anything.
- Nice thin bezel all the way around and stand is a good height for desktop (although not adjustable)
- It has a built in HDTV ATSC tuner that I'll probably never use.
- 42in is definitely not too big for a desktop monitor
- I have a dead pixel and maybe a tiny dust spec behind the glass (No big deal given the price and resolution).
- softMCCS reports it as "Soyo 4K2K" manufactured 2013 and DDC/CI not supported
- 4K @ 60Hz desktop looks like 4:2:0 no noticeable lag. Obvious mouse lag @ 30hz
- $10 "Mediabridge ULTRA Series HDMI Cable (10 Feet)" works fine for HDMI 2.0
-PG
Couple of things:
- Pretty impressive out the box - haven't tried configuring anything.
- Nice thin bezel all the way around and stand is a good height for desktop (although not adjustable)
- It has a built in HDTV ATSC tuner that I'll probably never use.
- 42in is definitely not too big for a desktop monitor
- I have a dead pixel and maybe a tiny dust spec behind the glass (No big deal given the price and resolution).
- softMCCS reports it as "Soyo 4K2K" manufactured 2013 and DDC/CI not supported
- 4K @ 60Hz desktop looks like 4:2:0 no noticeable lag. Obvious mouse lag @ 30hz
- $10 "Mediabridge ULTRA Series HDMI Cable (10 Feet)" works fine for HDMI 2.0
-PG
I hate doing photos cause Im not a photographer. My pics dont do the monitor justice
You were telling the truth. Blacks do look good, wow! That's beautiful, I bet it looks amazing in person
What did you use to resize? The images are being compress a lot... ugh lol
