Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SHIZ and criccio: You make me miss my E4GT so much. Why, Sprint, why must your service suck in Atlanta?
If there were some way to make the E4GT work on Verizon, I'd buy one at full price. Best smart phone on the market, IMO.Such a great phone. Kicks the crap out of the Galaxy Nexus in benchmarks, too. Samsung's Exynos's CPU's just plain rock.
Such a great phone. Kicks the crap out of the Galaxy Nexus in benchmarks, too. Samsung's Exynos's CPU's just plain rock.
SHIZ and criccio: You make me miss my E4GT so much. Why, Sprint, why must your service suck in Atlanta?
It does where I live, in the Doraville-Chamblee-Brookhaven area. Calls drop all the time. Magnetik, one of the moderators on [H], has the same problem whenever he's around here.It doesn't
Granted, I'm about a 20 minute drive out from the center, but my 4G is awesome.
Such a great phone. Kicks the crap out of the Galaxy Nexus in benchmarks, too. Samsung's Exynos's CPU's just plain rock.
Which doesn't make sense because it's the exact same CPU, just a different GPU. I'm guessing the benchmark apps need updated for ICS or something. Comparing GPUs is hard though because the G-Nex has to push significantly more pixels.
Which doesn't make sense because it's the exact same CPU, just a different GPU. I'm guessing the benchmark apps need updated for ICS or something. Comparing GPUs is hard though because the G-Nex has to push significantly more pixels.
they did put lower end CPU in there as well, you know, right? Originally, it was only supposed to be the gpu, but then they decided on CPU as well, not to mention the lower end camera. Display isn't super amoled plus, and it is pen tile. Side by side, I'd take epic touch display any day!
Nope. The Galaxy Nexus has a TI OMAP 4460 CPU and the PowerVR SGX540 GPU while the Galaxy S II is powered by a Samsung Exynos CPU and the Mali-400MP GPU. Yes, both CPU's are Cortex A9's but use them both side by side.. the Samsung chipset is clearly superior.
The ONLY thing the Galaxy Nexus has going for it is display resolution.. that's it. Give me that display with the GSII internals and you have an epic phone.
Otherwise, the Galaxy S II variants stomp all over it.
Otherwise, the Galaxy S II variants stomp all over it.
Sprint Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch)
[ ROM ] Calkulin's E4GT v2.6 [ EL26 l Fast l Tweaked l Battery Saver Script ]
[THEME][ACS]ICS Theme[12/21/11]Updated EL13 Love
It seems my widgets didn't update for this screenshot. Odd.. its fine now.
Not nearly....
The CPU parts of each SoC are more or less equally matched, with the OMAP winning some tests, and the Exynos winning others.... look up benchmarks comparing the I9100 to the I9100G to see what I mean....
More significantly, a mainstream phone with an OMAP 4 with *solid developer support* has a gigantic advantage over a phone running the Exynos processor because of the open source drivers that TI released for the OMAP, something that is exceedingly rare for most SoC manufacturers these days....
Compiling future releases of Android for TI processors is almost trivial, and phones like the Galaxy Nexus and I9100G are in an excellent position to become extremely long lived phones because of this...
Samsung's Exynos chips are comparatively much, much harder for devs to work on, and as of right now, with almost 9 months or nonstop work, the problems with developing for the Exynos still haven't been solved.... at least by coders at cyanogen and the rest of XDA.... Sure there are AOSP builds for Exynos, but they are riddled with bugs and incomplete implementations....
Exynos may have comparatively better graphics performance (and not even that much better, the Galaxy Nexus' higher resolution hurt its standing in many synthetic benches...), but OMAP 4 is a chip that will live a long, long life in the development community. This may not always matter to some users however, so trading between graphics performance, and real, stable, and quick aftermarket support will be personally up to each individual buyer...
Even so, as it is, the Galaxy Nexus is the single best Android phone on the market at the moment. It has the best performance, an unmolested OS, and not only the guaranteed support of Google themselves, but a legion of aftermarket coders who have *real* tools to bring AOSP to it without relying on binary blobs for the SoC from the manufacturer to build new point releases...
My ONLY complaint about iPhone? I wish I could move my Calender icon to the right side of the screen. I'm at 7%, but I took my phone off the charger yesterday morning.
theres a cydia tweak that'll let you do that if you're jailbroken
Wait... you cant put the icons where you want them in iOS?
Wait... you cant put the icons where you want them in iOS?
That is crazy.
Sometimes I wish I could start honest conversation about the two OS's around here, because I am honestly interested in certain aspects vs Android. But unfortunately thats not possible anymore.
just make another thread.....
Not nearly....
The CPU parts of each SoC are more or less equally matched, with the OMAP winning some tests, and the Exynos winning others.... look up benchmarks comparing the I9100 to the I9100G to see what I mean....
More significantly, a mainstream phone with an OMAP 4 with *solid developer support* has a gigantic advantage over a phone running the Exynos processor because of the open source drivers that TI released for the OMAP, something that is exceedingly rare for most SoC manufacturers these days....
Compiling future releases of Android for TI processors is almost trivial, and phones like the Galaxy Nexus and I9100G are in an excellent position to become extremely long lived phones because of this...
Samsung's Exynos chips are comparatively much, much harder for devs to work on, and as of right now, with almost 9 months or nonstop work, the problems with developing for the Exynos still haven't been solved.... at least by coders at cyanogen and the rest of XDA.... Sure there are AOSP builds for Exynos, but they are riddled with bugs and incomplete implementations....
Exynos may have comparatively better graphics performance (and not even that much better, the Galaxy Nexus' higher resolution hurt its standing in many synthetic benches...), but OMAP 4 is a chip that will live a long, long life in the development community. This may not always matter to some users however, so trading between graphics performance, and real, stable, and quick aftermarket support will be personally up to each individual buyer...
Even so, as it is, the Galaxy Nexus is the single best Android phone on the market at the moment. It has the best performance, an unmolested OS, and not only the guaranteed support of Google themselves, but a legion of aftermarket coders who have *real* tools to bring AOSP to it without relying on binary blobs for the SoC from the manufacturer to build new point releases...
Now that you mention this, it seems to make sense why they chose the TI OMAP soc instead of the Exynos since this is supposed to be a developer phone.
Regardless of where on this forum it is, someone will take a discussion with any debate as a personal insult on them, and turn it into a pissing contest, shortly there after being locked. Everyone is so touchy now-days, old [H] was best [H].