Portable SSD make a huge difference over a portable normal hard drive ?

ng4ever

[H]ard|Gawd
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
1,600
Lets say if I am limited to USB 2 speeds at times mostly?

Other times USB 3.
 

rhansen5_99

2[H]4U
Joined
Nov 12, 2001
Messages
2,107
Well at the very least you don't have to worry as much about physical damage to the drive itself. Speed will prob be faster on usb3.
 

GotNoRice

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Jul 11, 2001
Messages
9,604
What are your goals for the drive? You probably won't see a huge difference when using USB 2.0. USB 2.0 speeds are less than half of what you get using Gigabit Ethernet for example. Even most mechanical drives can saturate a USB 2.0 connection easily. Only benefit might be if copying a very large amount of very tiny files, where a mechanical drive might drop below USB 2.0 speeds when it struggles with all of those tiny files while an SSD probably wouldn't. With USB 3.0 or above the SSD would clearly have the advantage.

For me though, the reasons why I usually need a portable USB hard drive include the need for a large capacity. If I don't need a lot of capacity, then I usually just use a USB thumb drive. Putting an expensive large SSD inside a USB enclosure seems like a waste.
 

riffer

Weaksauce
Joined
Jun 3, 2004
Messages
65
As above. Buy a drive that matches the speed of the data drive and the interface.
e.g. I have a 7200 rpm HDD on my server. I backup with a 7200RPM bare drive using a SATA hot swap bay. I could use eSATA as well.
NVME I am currently using a SATA SSD through an eSATA dock but I could probably use a NVME external drive through USBC if I really neede it to be faster.
 

westrock2000

[H]F Junkie
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
9,187
Depends on your needs. If you are just saving a small file here and there or watching movies, then a regular hard drive isn't a problem, especially for the price versus capacity.

But if you are going to be accessing lots of files in random location, then an SSD would be noticeable. My real world examples are having a music drive or photo drive. Especially if editing them.

I have a Samsung T5 SSD and it is fantastic. It sustains 300MB/s no issue.The form factor is also very nice. Another option I have tried recently is that you can buy M2 to USB enclosures that are pretty small. But watch out there are both SATA 3 and NVME versions. Need to match it to the type of drive you have. A regular 128GB "flash drive" isn't going to have the read/write performance of a real M2 SSD.

 

Attachments

cybereality

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
5,677
The enclosure is a nice option, but make sure you get a good brand.

I got some random one off NewEgg and was using it for a Linux dual boot (and yes, it was fast enough).

Worked great for a few months, then I started getting freezing/crashing constantly and eventually the drive would not boot.

I thought it was strange, because the M.2 drive itself was Samsung and not a cheap brand. So I got a PCIe adapter and the drive was 100% working.

The headache and potential data loss (luckily nothing for me) was more than I saved on a cheap enclosure.
 

Vengance_01

Supreme [H]ardness
Joined
Dec 23, 2001
Messages
6,110
I think from a speed and protection from drive falling/being dropped I would use Flash/NAND now for external backups unless you need a large amount of space where the economics favor spinning disks. I mean just got a WD 8TB easy store for 140$ and I will need 5-6TBs right off the bat.
 
Top