I agree, modern day pop is absolutely horrible! I would rather listen to the sound of nails screeching down the chalkboard than listen to that over produced/computerized crap they call "pop"!
Also, is it just me, or is the modern day country music just as bad? I'm a classic/old rock lover myself, but I appreciate all types of music. For the past ~10 years, everything popular that's come out of the "country world" sounds like pop with a fakey southern drawl.
So pop music today is bad because it's repetitive (just like almost every pop song ever written). OK. Here's to you Mickey, My Sharona, and Why Don't we do it in the Road.
This is the very reason I don't listen to mainstream country music anymore. For 10+ years it has been little more than rehashed pop and rap from the 90s. I didn't like the pop and rap in the 90s and I still don't like it now that they call it country.
Also interesting is that several of the local country music radio stations seem to realize the same issue. It's at least an hourly thing on some of the stations to play at least two songs from the 80s, 90s and early 2000s before the transition of country to pop music. There are also more and more oldies and classic country shows on the stations as well as time blocks where they play just about anything but the rehashed pop and rap music.
Pretty sure someone figured out that formula long before computers were around.
I can remember Lucinda Williams calling it Nashvegas 20 years ago, so this really isn't a new thing. 80s country had it's fair share of pop. IMO, country has essentially been pop/rock music from 20 or so years earlier for about 25-30 years (maybe longer). And while we can complain about pop today, let's not forget that the 80s had plenty of god awful pop music. But I know people here will disagree, because they love the 80s-- a time when they were in their teens or 20s and most music was amazingModern country music is especially bad when it comes to repetitive homogeneity.
I don't need AI to tell me modern pop music sucks. My coworker listens to the radio.
I gave him that radio.
I hate that radio.
I do agree that today's music does suck, its just easy to produce quickly. Hell 95% of industry no longer writes their own music anymore they are just the voice talent and nothing more. That's why it sucks, nothing is from the gut or soul its just trends that writers observe and create from. Some of the best songs are from artists that can sing and write from what they are experiencing and most of which people can relate with. I promise that Katy Perry and Demo Levoto aren't living shit they sing about.
While there are some covers I am surprised they can keep coming up with new ideas.
This comment reads like someone who is too young to know what they're talking about. Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Bush, Stone Temple Pilots...bands no one's ever heard off and in no way popular...come on dude...
I cant agree with much of what is being said here. If I were to try to produce a nice product, do you think I would be more successful if I gathered the top talents from all over the world and had them collaborate, or if I expected a single person to do it all? Your argument is like saying people are stupid now because the school system has all these different teachers teaching them instead of just mom like in the old home school on the farm days. Music is a form of art, some art can be great if made by a single person, but there is a big space for art that is a collaboration of many great minds and talents. Even if you cannot appreciate it, I can still see the talent, heck I can still appreciate it even when its not something I particularly like. If someone just so happens to be very creative and write a good set of lyrics then I don't see any problem with a person whom has a great voice singing it, and another group whom is good at creating the beat all putting it together to make the highest quality product. This in contrast to expecting that person to learn how to sing, and play instruments and compose which is a life time of work, most of those songs would simply never see the light of day. Its funny to me how all these arm chair quarter backs love to diss the industry but I have to ask when you go to work does your company hire you to do 5 different jobs, IE are you the accountant, the engineer, assembler, the supply chain, and the marketing team? For most people no, you hire other people to help you.
I think the bigger issue is that when you are older you start to see repeating patterns. That's fine there is only so many ways you can string beats together, there are only so many styles of voices, and types of stories to be told. Eventually things have to repeat. Just like in the movie industry there are only so many compelling stories to tell. Someone whom is younger may really like something you find to be garbage because you feel it copies something older. But I think that to some degree the work had to be reimagined with modern technology and methods.
I think people should actually give the modern music industry a little more credit. They are dealing with a world where they have to be creative and come up with new stuff to sell when tons of stuff has already been done. Imagine if you were trying to sell cars in a world where cars never rust or go bad. It would be pretty hard don't you think?
I actually find it fairly impressive that now days we have this very wide music industry, there are groups composing music I can't even put my finger on and say what the genre really is. I think it speaks volumes to what is out there. Then you have the pop industry that just keeps cranking out the hits. While there are some covers I am surprised they can keep coming up with new ideas.
I think grunge rock was the last good popular genre... if you could ever call grunge popular...
This doesn't really mean anything, because collaboration between writers and composers doesn't mean something is going to be designed by committee.
"Rock is not music," said most people your age 50 years ago.All music sux nowadays. I always find myself reverting to classic rock/old rap/90's alternative rock.
The thing we don't know is who the primary writers were. I have little doubt that if the Beatles were to write the same songs today and George Martin did exactly what he did in the 60s, Martin would get a writing credit on some songs.This doesn't really mean anything, because collaboration between writers and composers doesn't mean something is going to be designed by committee.
Just another example of "In my time music was better because of [insert random reason here]".
and don't forget "i'm too sexy" Honestly I'm sure there were tons of shit songs in the 90s, I just don't remember them anymore....same with most in other decades, because we don't listen to shit songs for 20+ years...or even 10+ years.I'd just end up quoting almost everyone in this thread if I tried to, but this thread just keeps pulling the hits. People need to step back and look at things holistically. Every generation had stuff that was garbage. Anyone saying that the 90's had great songs needs to remember that the 90's also produced "The macarena". I can basically bet that someone on here could point out similar references to almost any period in time.
I wouldn't go as far to say as all popular songs are bad either, but history has a way to completely weed out the fads and the trash, until it's time for someone to recycle it as something new.
it does. How many words are in biebers baby?This doesn't really mean anything, because collaboration between writers and composers doesn't mean something is going to be designed by committee.
Just another example of "In my time music was better because of [insert random reason here]".
MTV created all popular music from the 80s and up until MTV was no longer considered the soul source of all popular music. The problem with music today the artists don't take risks and just sing what maybe the Radio might play. Also genetics people are no longer born with Deep voices due toe DNA manipulation so Heavy Metal bands no longer have aggressive vocals.
I have to say it again, all new shit SUX.
I'm not a fan (mostly because it's overused, but before Autotune, they fixed vocals by varying the speed of the tape as needed and a lot of Autotune is used an effect, not entirely unlike the a flange effect used by the Beatles and many other artists over the years..Autotune. Fucking evil.
It's not just you. The "Bro-Country" invasion and movement towards mainstream pop makes it difficult to determine which genre of radio station you're listening to anymore, much less tell any of the "artists" apart. I went about a decade thinking I didn't like country music any longer, and it turned out they just quit making it in Nashville, as that's all that gets on the radio. But they've been at it the whole time in Oklahoma and (as much as it pains me to admit) especially Texas, where the regional "Red Dirt" scene is alive and well. Sure, Nashville is trying to play catchup, after seeing Chris Stapleton with the guy from Nsync, and remembered what country music was supposed to be. Check out the Turnpike Troubadours, Jason Boland, Wade Bowen... There's plenty of good new music out there, you just have to know to look for it.I agree, modern day pop is absolutely horrible! I would rather listen to the sound of nails screeching down the chalkboard than listen to that over produced/computerized crap they call "pop"!
Also, is it just me, or is the modern day country music just as bad? I'm a classic/old rock lover myself, but I appreciate all types of music. For the past ~10 years, everything popular that's come out of the "country world" sounds like pop with a fakey southern drawl.