The MAC address isn't accessible from the browser, and it changes at every hop.
I don't like google has the data to begin with.
Shouldn't be that hard to understand. if you still don't get it let me know and i'l ltry to explain it to in more details
Of your router. Pretty sure he's talking about the connected server knowing the MAC of the desk/laptop the user is sitting at. So like if I went to HardOCP, the website doesn't have a way of knowing my computers MAC without running some sort of client side script.No it doesn't. The packets are tagged with the MAC of the last transmitted equipment, but the original source MAC for the machine that sent to packet does not change meaning the ISP knows your MAC. Your MAC don't change unless you change equipment.
I don't know, I don't see this as unreasonable on behalf of the police.
If a judge evaluated it and gave the warrant, I think its reasonable, its a very specific warrant too for what I assume is a narrow term (non-famous person I assume), that is part of why I think its reasonable.
Who would really be looking for Joe blow's name anyway.
If this was a warrant for people who searched brad pitt.. my opinion would be different.
"a case where someone managed to steal money from a credit union using a forged passport containing a photo of the account holder."
America is becoming more and more of a police state everyday. We've moved past, "Think of the children", to "Think of the credit union's money".
Of your router. Pretty sure he's talking about the connected server knowing the MAC of the desk/laptop the user is sitting at. So like if I went to HardOCP, the website doesn't have a way of knowing my computers MAC without running some sort of client side script.
What ever happened to him? https://hardforum.com/members/creepyunclegoogle.262772/
I was told that back when [H] had everyone reset their passwords about a year ago, he just never did, and hasn't been back since.
One look at my sig should make it clear that I miss him not being around.
Way too many of us get way too serious including me as much as anyone. CUG had a way of reminding me of that flaw of mine.
Wow what an over reach. They have no other way to find the info they need? And even us not-lawyers-but-we-watch-law-and-order-lawyers can argue ip address =/= person responsible. What are they really trying to do here?