Playboy To Drop Nudity As Internet Fills Demand

The real Playboy ceased to exist a couple of years ago after it was bought out by the people who run Brazzers. The girls they feature now are just airbrushed bimbos.
 
The articles tend to be idiotic tripe, or they were the last time I bothered to even look at a copy. Seems pointless to remove the nudity, but oh well, it's his magazine.
 
Eh I never bought PB, didn't care for Hefner. I supported a bigger asshole by buying hustler. :D I didn't just want women in lingerie, I wanted full nudity and beyond. Besides, some of the old clothing catalogs had sexier lingerie pics than PB did.
 
Well, plastic tits and photoshopped waxwork dolls in boring poses were never my thing. RIP Playboy
 
If you think a business relying on nudity can compete with the internet as a whole you are a fool.
This was a good choice by them.
 
I'm going to assume they are going for the Maxim, Vibe, Men's Health crowd now? The younger hipper crowd?

Problem is I think Playboy, I think old fogey.

Yes, and the larger advertising pool willing to advertise in such, and the increased distribution locations those magazines have access to.

Maybe they will do fun stuff like put in QR codes form the photo shoots to see the rest online. Essentially letting them sell porn in supermarkets.
 
I'm going to assume they are going for the Maxim, Vibe, Men's Health crowd now? The younger hipper crowd?

Problem is I think Playboy, I think old fogey.

I agree. They are going to have to change the name if they want more subscribers. Even without the nudity, who is going to be walking around reading their Playboy out in the open? Everyone will think you're some creepy pervert.
 
but who buys magazines any more?

Serious answer:
Dudes who work in Deadhorse, AK.

In Deadhorse, there is basically no internet service, no women, no alcohol, and only two or three establishments resembling stores (although one of them is the Greatest Hardware Store in the World).

The Greatest Hardware Store in the World has a little convenience store attached to it that sells all sorts of things, including print magazines. Suffice to say that their selection of adult oriented materials is quite extensive.
 
and too many of the women featured these last few years have been silicone filled. where the fuck are the naturals....
Absolutely. who wants to look at good looking women. Give me saggy pointy t!ts that hang down to her hips and point at the ground, or roll into her armpits and lie on the bed beside her anytime. Who needs perky nipples that might poke your eye out! Girls with muffin tops, and back fat. All natural, obese girls. We need more hips with saddlebags too. And butts that sag. While we're at it, lets go with frizzy, straw hair with lots of grey in it. acne, too, don't want to cover up anything 'natural'. Maybe nice, bushy eyebrows and a mustache. And let those leg hairs and the ones around the nipple grow, that's natural too. And a nice bush under each arm to go with what's in the crotch. All natural, all the time.

Now that I've grossed you out about all that 'natural' beauty, lets get back to those women who will do absolutely anything to look good.
 
Absolutely. who wants to look at good looking women. Give me saggy pointy t!ts that hang down to her hips and point at the ground, or roll into her armpits and lie on the bed beside her anytime. Who needs perky nipples that might poke your eye out! Girls with muffin tops, and back fat. All natural, obese girls. We need more hips with saddlebags too. And butts that sag. While we're at it, lets go with frizzy, straw hair with lots of grey in it. acne, too, don't want to cover up anything 'natural'. Maybe nice, bushy eyebrows and a mustache. And let those leg hairs and the ones around the nipple grow, that's natural too. And a nice bush under each arm to go with what's in the crotch. All natural, all the time.

Now that I've grossed you out about all that 'natural' beauty, lets get back to those women who will do absolutely anything to look good.

Give me a break. I assume you have never been with an actual woman. There is a difference between natural beauty and fake beauty. I'm not even arguing against "enhancements" in general - some women actually do look better that way. There is also a difference between natural beauty and average, a difference between average and plain, and a difference between plain and ugly.

There is more than enough women to fill the pages of magazines and websites that have natural beauty without the use of injections or surgical enhancements. Yes, some women are genetically incapable of it, but there are many that have the genes. All it takes is a healthy lifestyle and routine hygiene/maintenance for them to be naturally beautiful - though there can be life circumstances preventing that lifestyle at times.

No one (at least in this topic, though you can be guaranteed there are SJWs elsewhere pushing for it) is talking about replacing the "fake beauty" women with average, plain, or ugly women - people are talking about replacing them (or at least using equally as much) with naturally beautiful women. And even more importantly, whether natural or fake, STOP THE AIRBRUSHING. Seriously, airbrushing as a concept is totally stupid, not just limited to this topic. Not good enough without airbrushing? Then take whatever it is out of the picture entirely or abandon the picture altogether.
 
You mean their magazine was being used exactly what it was used for in the first place and not for reading? Shocker!
 
Reading the Article they will show breasts but not "full frontal nudity", so its not a full return.

Unfortunately for them it is a dead business anyway since high speed internet is so widespread. They will be closed within 5 - 10 years. Maybe sooner if they don't downsize considerably. They could stay open for a long time if they really cut down and recognize the niche they fill, but the team will need to be really small to be profitable.
 
Why does Playboy still even exist? They should call it "Flirty Metrosexual Non-Binary Gender", since there's nothing Playboy really left about it.
 
Twas never nudity in Playboy. Was but only a well placed bush.

adanyeva-caida.jpg
 
Reading the Article they will show breasts but not "full frontal nudity", so its not a full return.

Unfortunately for them it is a dead business anyway since high speed internet is so widespread. They will be closed within 5 - 10 years. Maybe sooner if they don't downsize considerably. They could stay open for a long time if they really cut down and recognize the niche they fill, but the team will need to be really small to be profitable.
All Playboy was was Hef Hugher's personal bordello. Anything else was just icing on the cake.
 
Well that didnt last long did it.

I mean who woulda thunk it?

A magazine famous for posting tasteful nudes of people (sometimes semi-famous peoples) lost a shit ton of money once it decided to stop doing that.

https://www.yahoo.com/celebrity/playboy-bringing-back-nudity-pledging-194655959.html

Chief Creative Officer Connor Hefner – the 25-year-old son of Hugh Hefner – simultaneously tweeted, “I’ll be the first to admit that the way in which the magazine portrayed nudity was dated, but removing it entirely was a mistake. Nudity was never the problem because nudity isn’t a problem. Today, we’re taking our identity back and reclaiming who we are.”
 
I mean who woulda thunk it?

A magazine famous for posting tasteful nudes of people (sometimes semi-famous peoples) lost a shit ton of money once it decided to stop doing that.

https://www.yahoo.com/celebrity/playboy-bringing-back-nudity-pledging-194655959.html

Chief Creative Officer Connor Hefner – the 25-year-old son of Hugh Hefner – simultaneously tweeted, “I’ll be the first to admit that the way in which the magazine portrayed nudity was dated, but removing it entirely was a mistake. Nudity was never the problem because nudity isn’t a problem. Today, we’re taking our identity back and reclaiming who we are.”

iron man movie comes to mind.

"so they are an weapons manufacturer that doesn't make weapons! abandon ship!"
 
Back
Top