Perfomance in Crysis demo with x1950Pro

Lyquist

2[H]4U
Joined
Aug 21, 2004
Messages
3,368
I bought this card about a month ago and it performs pretty well in Crysis at 1280x1024. I am not sure how to check the frame rate in Vista (will fraps work???) but it appears to be around 30 or so with medium details. I can play it on high details, but it gets a bit choppy in parts. I probably won't buy the game, as I don't really care for these types of games, but it was good to see that my system with the 1950Pro would at least run it at my monitors native resolution.
 
My x1950pro 512mb plays crysis at 1680x1050 at medium settings pretty well. not quite sure what frame rate I am getting, but it didn't seem choppy at all. ATI Tool I guess won't display the frame rate for some reason...

On a side note, I am disappointed in how inaccurate you shoot in the game....
 
Im playing at 1280x768 and my X850XT PE is chugging along fine at medium settings, getting between 30-45fps..The game is "OK" the graphics are very nice but im not sure what all the hype is about it. I'd have to agree w/Master-Pain, the shooting is very inaccurate..from a farther distance away I was having more luck with the pistol than the MG...LOL....Its funny though how some of these guys are going out and spending sooooooo much money on the top of the line card just to play this game and IMO its not that great....OH well..to each their own I guess...:D
 
my 8600GTS played it at 1024x768 with everything on medium except for textures and models at high. i get about 30fps, im running vista and dx10
 
I can run at 1680x1050, all medium, noAA, 4xAF, but it dips very low in some places.

Instead, I bumped the res down to 1280x800, medium, and bumped the AA to 2xMSAA and the AF to 4xHQ. It runs a lot faster (no dips at all), and I can't tell a difference visual-wise.

This is on Windows Vista, BTW.
 
My x1950pro 512mb plays crysis at 1680x1050 at medium settings pretty well. not quite sure what frame rate I am getting, but it didn't seem choppy at all. ATI Tool I guess won't display the frame rate for some reason...
nice exaggeration. theres no way you are averaging more than 15-20 fps at that res.
 
nice exaggeration. theres no way you are averaging more than 15-20 fps at that res.

Well, if ATI Tool would display the frame rate in game, I would know for sure, but there was no choppiness whatsoever, so I would assume a minimum of 25FPS
 
Well, if ATI Tool would display the frame rate in game, I would know for sure, but there was no choppiness whatsoever, so I would assume a minimum of 25FPS
well I guarantee you that your minimum is closer to 10fps at 1680x1050 on a x1950pro. you are not even averaging as high as you think your minimum is.
 
well I guarantee you that your minimum is closer to 10fps at 1680x1050 on a x1950pro. you are not even averaging as high as you think your minimum is.

No way. I'm running a system roughly equal to his and I dipped down as low as maybe 20fps, but not lower, at the settings he is claiming. This is on Windows Vista too. If he's running XP, I could easily see 25fps.

Besides, what do you care what the hard numbers are? If it runs smooth, that's all that matters. Mine ran smooth everywhere except the beginning where there was heavy foliage. I wanted it smooth everywhere, so I lowered the res, but I could easily imagine him running the way he is. What are you, jealous that his last-gen ATI card is beating your current-gen NVIDIA card? :p ;)
 
No way. I'm running a system roughly equal to his and I dipped down as low as maybe 20fps, but not lower, at the settings he is claiming. This is on Windows Vista too. If he's running XP, I could easily see 25fps.

thats funny because a few minutes ago you said this when you were talking about those settings


I tried it. 30fps in good spots, 15 in bad.
 
Even I dip down to 24fps with an 8800GTS heavily overclocked (690 core) at 1680x1050 same settings as Inorganic... And I'm running in XP.
 
Well, if ATI Tool would display the frame rate in game, I would know for sure, but there was no choppiness whatsoever, so I would assume a minimum of 25FPS

Go and download FRAPS and then you will know what your fps is.....its free...
 
i just played through the game, everything on medium except Post Processing, Physics, and audio, those were set to high.

no AA/AF, 1280x1024, i averaged about 35fps.
 
i just played through the game, everything on medium except Post Processing, Physics, and audio, those were set to high.

no AA/AF, 1280x1024, i averaged about 35fps.
well your x1950xt is quite a bit stronger than their x1950pro so that sounds about right. ;)
 
thats funny because a few minutes ago you said this when you were talking about those settings
Bah, you get what I meant. This is what happens when I try to post early in the morning before getting my coffee, after being up very late the night before taking care of a sick kid. You should feel honored I thought of [H] before coffee. :p
 
My X1950pro plays at 1280x1024, all medium settings, no AA.
Runs at 20FPS, drops quite a bit. Quite surprising that 20-25FPS is playable.

I've had my X1950pro since early this year, has held up really well. Plays Bioshock pretty well and all other games. Crysis is the real killer though.

Looks like I'll have to upgrade D:
 
well I guarantee you that your minimum is closer to 10fps at 1680x1050 on a x1950pro. you are not even averaging as high as you think your minimum is.

Well, I would notice if it dipped down to 10 because I would be moving sporadically, anything below 20-25fps would cause a lot of jerkiness and ya, there is none, its very fluid. So instead of bashing people, stfu.
 
Well, I would notice if it dipped down to 10 because I would be moving sporadically, anything below 20-25fps would cause a lot of jerkiness and ya, there is none, its very fluid. So instead of bashing people, stfu.
perhaps you should read the quotes from 1950pro owners that actually checked the fps instead of GUESSING. the first guy is easily dropping below 20fps quite a bit and hes only at 1280x1024 not the 1680x1050 you are at. the next guy says 10-20fps at 1680x1050. see, you ARE getting dips that low and thats a FACT just like I told you from the beginning. luckily the game doesnt feel that bad when the frames drop down so thats why you didnt really notice it. ;)

My X1950pro plays at 1280x1024, all medium settings, no AA.
Runs at 20FPS, drops quite a bit. Quite surprising that 20-25FPS is playable.
Looks like I'll have to upgrade D:

1650x1050 with an x1950 Pro will give you 10-20 FPS at best with a mixture of medium settings. You can't tell just from jerkiness, I can play at around 12-15 FPS fine, and it doesn't jerk, you just don't have a smoothness of frames.

How about this people, goto the bin32 folder and run the GPU benchmark and tell me what you get on your x1950s? I get 7.69 FPS AVERAGE! with everything high.
 
Im suprised my X1300 Pro ran this game :p

1200x800, Everything low except models and textures @ medium. 15 it's lowest, 35 it's best and a constant 22-24 FPS. Not bad for a craptastic card.
 
perhaps you should read a quote from a 1950pro owner that actually checked the fps instead of GUESSING. you ARE getting dips that low and thats a FACT just like I told you from the beginning. luckily the game doesnt feel that bad when the frames drop down.

Dude, why are you pushing this so hard? The game feels just fine at 20-25fps thanks to the motion blurring. Why are you giving this guy such a hard time about his card, just because his guess was off? Lay off him already. It feels fine with this hardware at these settings and that's all that matters - numbers mean nothing.
 
Dude, why are you pushing this so hard? The game feels just fine at 20-25fps thanks to the motion blurring. Why are you giving this guy such a hard time about his card, just because his guess was off? Lay off him already. It feels fine with this hardware at these settings and that's all that matters - numbers mean nothing.
he brought the topic back up so I simply replied to him. he is the one claiming the BS numbers not me. also I clearly said the game doesnt feel that bad when the frames drop down right there in my reply you just quoted. ;)
 
1650x1050 with an x1950 Pro will give you 10-20 FPS at best with a mixture of medium settings. You can't tell just from jerkiness, I can play at around 12-15 FPS fine, and it doesn't jerk, you just don't have a smoothness of frames.

How about this people, goto the bin32 folder and run the GPU benchmark and tell me what you get on your x1950s? I get 7.69 FPS AVERAGE! with everything high.
 
1650x1050 with an x1950 Pro will give you 10-20 FPS at best with a mixture of medium settings. You can't tell just from jerkiness, I can play at around 12-15 FPS fine, and it doesn't jerk, you just don't have a smoothness of frames.

How about this people, goto the bin32 folder and run the GPU benchmark and tell me what you get on your x1950s? I get 7.69 FPS AVERAGE! with everything high.

My average was 22.80 on the GPU test, so that one dude can still stfu
minimum was 15.36 and max was 32.77
 
Well, if ATI Tool would display the frame rate in game, I would know for sure, but there was no choppiness whatsoever, so I would assume a minimum of 25FPS

well I guarantee you that your minimum is closer to 10fps at 1680x1050 on a x1950pro. you are not even averaging as high as you think your minimum is.

My average was 22.80 on the GPU test, so that one dude can still stfu
minimum was 15.36 and max was 32.77
So your average framerate was LOWER than what you "thought" youre minimum was just like I told you earlier. Instead of telling me to stfu like some little teenager would do maybe you should realize that I pretty much knew what I was saying from the beginning. This game is weird and it doesnt feel as slow as the actual fps would indicate.
 
Here's what I'm getting on my 1950pro 256mb. This is at 1024x768 med settings on. Ati control panel is set to high for mip map detail.

Running GPU benchmark 1
Results will depend on current system settings
Press any key to continue . . .
Running...
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 58.92s, Average FPS: 33.94
Min FPS: 23.49 at frame 1953, Max FPS: 44.26 at frame 1012
Average Tri/Sec: 24415604, Tri/Frame: 719325
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.27
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 52.96s, Average FPS: 37.77
Min FPS: 23.49 at frame 1953, Max FPS: 55.75 at frame 77
Average Tri/Sec: 27485950, Tri/Frame: 727764
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 52.86s, Average FPS: 37.84
Min FPS: 23.49 at frame 1953, Max FPS: 56.53 at frame 117
Average Tri/Sec: 27539220, Tri/Frame: 727821
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 52.82s, Average FPS: 37.86
Min FPS: 23.49 at frame 1953, Max FPS: 56.53 at frame 117
Average Tri/Sec: 27552606, Tri/Frame: 727702
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Press any key to continue . . .
 
Not too bad at 1280x1024 and med settings:



==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 72.91s, Average FPS: 27.43
Min FPS: 19.56 at frame 1953, Max FPS: 32.86 at frame 980
Average Tri/Sec: 19767600, Tri/Frame: 720664
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.27
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 68.99s, Average FPS: 28.99
Min FPS: 19.55 at frame 1955, Max FPS: 40.87 at frame 84
Average Tri/Sec: 21106700, Tri/Frame: 728070
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 68.88s, Average FPS: 29.04
Min FPS: 19.55 at frame 1955, Max FPS: 40.87 at frame 84
Average Tri/Sec: 21140380, Tri/Frame: 728055
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 68.91s, Average FPS: 29.02
Min FPS: 19.55 at frame 1955, Max FPS: 40.87 at frame 84
Average Tri/Sec: 21152148, Tri/Frame: 728825
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Press any key to continue . . .
 
10.2 with everything set to very high @ 1280x1024

post processing, physics, particles, audio set to high, the rest is on medium. 1280x1024
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 80.96s, Average FPS: 24.70
Min FPS: 5.60 at frame 142, Max FPS: 37.19 at frame 1632

!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 59.98s, Average FPS: 33.34
Min FPS: 5.60 at frame 142, Max FPS: 44.72 at frame 103

!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 59.70s, Average FPS: 33.50
Min FPS: 5.60 at frame 142, Max FPS: 45.20 at frame 87

!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 59.57s, Average FPS: 33.58
Min FPS: 5.60 at frame 142, Max FPS: 45.20 at frame 87

TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Press any key to continue . . .
 
1280x1024 medium settings, no aa/af, 7.10's, windows xp.

Results will depend on current system settings
Press any key to continue . . .
Running...
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 73.88s, Average FPS: 27.07
Min FPS: 20.25 at frame 1958, Max FPS: 34.20 at frame 124
Average Tri/Sec: 19517344, Tri/Frame: 720979
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.27
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 69.23s, Average FPS: 28.89
Min FPS: 19.82 at frame 1956, Max FPS: 40.20 at frame 94
Average Tri/Sec: 21035728, Tri/Frame: 728169
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 69.16s, Average FPS: 28.92
Min FPS: 19.61 at frame 1953, Max FPS: 40.77 at frame 90
Average Tri/Sec: 21072480, Tri/Frame: 728649
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 69.25s, Average FPS: 28.88
Min FPS: 19.41 at frame 1950, Max FPS: 40.77 at frame 90
Average Tri/Sec: 21041488, Tri/Frame: 728598
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.26
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Press any key to continue . . .


Tried running it at everything high, along with 2xAA. <1fps :)
 
1950Pro 256MB 580/695,1680x1050, all medium, 7.10, xp, Q6600@3GHz:
Avg ~22.5 fps, min. 16 fps, max. 31 fps. Playable.

Running GPU benchmark 1
Results will depend on current system settings
Press any key to continue . . .
Running...
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 90.75s, Average FPS: 22.04
Min FPS: 16.18 at frame 1939, Max FPS: 27.79 at frame 128
Average Tri/Sec: 19333116, Tri/Frame: 877261
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.04
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 88.20s, Average FPS: 22.68
Min FPS: 16.18 at frame 1939, Max FPS: 30.63 at frame 90
Average Tri/Sec: 20073304, Tri/Frame: 885245
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.04
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 88.31s, Average FPS: 22.65
Min FPS: 16.18 at frame 1939, Max FPS: 31.10 at frame 77
Average Tri/Sec: 20049414, Tri/Frame: 885268
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.04
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: 88.42s, Average FPS: 22.62
Min FPS: 15.98 at frame 1942, Max FPS: 31.10 at frame 77
Average Tri/Sec: 20028128, Tri/Frame: 885397
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.04
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Press any key to continue . . .
 
I have a X1950Pro 512mb and a 22` display

@ 1680x1050 Avg 20fps on medium settings, it will go as high as 30fps and low's that i've seen are 15fps.
 
Finally someone with common sense that doesn't try to run all Very high @ 1680x and up then cry. They gave us those many video settings for a reason; to scale the game to our hardware and taste.

I am running textures, objects and water very high, the rest high @ 1680x with zero issues on the DX 10 path under Vista x64.
 
Ya i'm not like some of the other clowns in here, I'm well aware of what my X1950pro can push. Its not very High or even high detail in crysis. What I do like about this game tho is even at avg 20 it is playable.
 
yes mine plays amazing with my x1950 pro, on XP that is, i could play the game on high settings with xp, but when i switched to vista, it seems as though all the drivers, even the new ati catalyst from ATi's website wich is supposed to be for vista, dont want to work on crysis, the video is awesome until i jump from the plane in the begining, then it just locks up the system or i get the blue screen and re-start.
 
Back
Top