- Joined
- Aug 20, 2006
- Messages
- 13,003
Intel has uploaded some of the ads from the PC industrys new marketing campaign. Most of the planet already seems to hate them, but what do you think?
And then they show you a folding tablet/laptop thing.
So the commercials are promoting portables, small form - I guess the desktops are dead and the faster cpu's are a waste. Great job Intel bunch, maybe killing off those actual useful and productive PCs.
this is not going to change anyone's perception of the clunky pc
So the commercials are promoting portables, small form - I guess the desktops are dead and the faster cpu's are a waste. Great job Intel bunch, maybe killing off those actual useful and productive PCs.
Desktop PC isn't dead, they are just more geared towards specific users such as gamer, or media editors for example. And those of us who do those stuff already knows why we need desktop PC, we love our performance and huge awesome displays. We don't need commercials to convince us of that.
For general usage, many people don't need high end performance or large display format. For these people, portability are beneficial too, and these hardware are geared towards them. Doesn't mean Intel isn't going to produce any hardware for the desktop/workstation segment anymore.
I wonder how many millions they spent on those absolutely awful, soon to be forgotten commercials. They're as bad as the pill commercials that don't tell you what the pill does, they show you all kinds of pictures of happy or miserable people, and then, just "ask your doctor if Sofdikmed is right for YOU!'.
That's why Microsoft is slowly backing away from tablets by rebranding their Surface name into a laptop computer (instead of marketing all of their products as tablets anymore) and changing their OS back to something that's intended to work with a keyboard and mousey or touchy-feely pad.
I wonder how many millions they spent on those absolutely awful, soon to be forgotten commercials. They're as bad as the pill commercials that don't tell you what the pill does, they show you all kinds of pictures of happy or miserable people, and then, just "ask your doctor if Sofdikmed is right for YOU!'.
It would be cool to see someone make a computer that has pretty low end specs so that the PCB can be tiny. the 7.5W or 10W Skylakes. Soldered memory, storage, you know the routine. But then put it in a laptop that isn't paper thin so you can get like 15-20 hours of run time off the battery.
Would anyone buy it? I don't know. But it would be nice to see on the market.
I'd totally be interested in that sorta thing. It's sort of silly to see all this stressing reducing thickness when the other two dimensions are the same no matter what. Giving up like the idea of keeping the innards cool and having lots of battery power is one of those things about mobility that's kinda dumb. I'm not at all a big pile of muscle, but I'd rather carry around a nice thick laptop with lots of battery life that runs really cool and doesn't throttle thermally or have to juggle passive cooling and screamy fan noise. Like, an inch to two inches thick is fine with me.
Lighter, thinner, faster, more power efficient and cheaper have always been key drivers in the development of computing devices. As many have stated on this subject, faster isn't delivering much these days for most general computing tasks. If thin and light and power efficient gets the job done then it has natural appeal. The main issue is cost, the fastest thin and light devices come with a price premium but that's always been the case.
However there is a point where the price reaches market tolerance otherwise most PCs would still be desktops. It actually wasn't too long ago that was the case, I don't think laptops started outselling desktops until around 2007.
I kept thinking of Wayne's World and "a sphincter says what?"![]()