Panel Makers to Shift Focus to 8K LCD in 2019

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by Megalith, Dec 29, 2018.

  1. Megalith

    Megalith 24-bit/48kHz Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,004
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    DigiTimes is reporting that major panel makers are going to begin pushing 8K next year. Despite low yield rates and high production costs, Samsung, LG, AU Optronics, and other major players are expected to produce displays ranging in size from 65” to 98” to entice early adopters, who are expected to comprise only .1% of the total market. “8K is four times the size of 4K, and sixteen times the size of 2K or 1080p.”

    Judging from the production roadmaps of individual companies, 65- and 75-inch models will be the mainstream sizes of the 8K LCD TV segment. Samsung and Innolux are expected to focus on 82-inch 8K panels; AUO and CSOT may roll out 85-inch models; and Sharp is to release 70- and 80-inch models. However, LG Display, Samsung, BOE, and CEC are also likely to launch 98-inch 8K panels, the sources indicated.
     
  2. Advil

    Advil [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,870
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    outside of cinema screens this is truly useless.
     
  3. JargonGR

    JargonGR Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    492
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    I would not mind a 130" roll up 8K OLED display that would eventually lead to replacing Front Projection. One day I think it will be a reality...
     
  4. Brian_B

    Brian_B 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,310
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    More pixels are always a good thing.

    That being said, deminishing returns and all - would be nicer to see them push improvements in HDR, in framerate, and other tech rather than just jumping the shark on pixel count.

    HDMI 2.1 will barely support this, and we don't even have that on anything modern yet.
     
  5. greenman

    greenman Gawd

    Messages:
    588
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    So would 8k need antialiasing? 4k screens don't need anti-aliasing and look great. If there's even less pixels, would there become an issue or would that be even better?
     
  6. tunatime

    tunatime 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,013
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Just no... Would rather them push vfr, higher hz 4k and panels to help with movement and moives to go to more then 24fps. Stick at 4k for the foreseeable future as it's enough for all but the giant screens. Also form what I remember getting old up to higher pixles is hard so I don't want this 8k movement to kill oled like the 4k did to pdp.
     
    GSDragoon, Armenius and Vercinaigh like this.
  7. Makaveli@BETA

    Makaveli@BETA 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,304
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
  8. Smashing Young Man

    Smashing Young Man [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,538
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Onward and upward I guess. Yes it seems to soon for this, but apparently the manufacturing process is at a point where companies think it viable. There is really no reason to complain about it.
     
  9. polonyc2

    polonyc2 [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    16,826
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    technology is moving too quick...stick with 4K for another 5-7 years
     
  10. gxp500

    gxp500 Gawd

    Messages:
    865
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2015
    Why not? Who doesn't want discounted 4k panels?
     
  11. pcgeekesq

    pcgeekesq [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,399
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    The only benefit I can see is a 6dB improvement in dynamic ranges and gray-scale linearity in upscaled 4K content, since 4 pixels working together to emulate one pixel can produce 4 times as many luminosity levels (in each channel).

    Oh, or maybe a reduction in OLED burn-in instead, by alternating between the four pixels or something.
     
    Talyrius, scan13, Armenius and 4 others like this.
  12. HeadRusch

    HeadRusch [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,126
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Good, I was getting sick of this shitty low-rez 4K bullshit.....
     
  13. Dudhunter

    Dudhunter n00b

    Messages:
    60
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2017
    Is there any content for this yet?
     
    LightsOut41 likes this.
  14. Sycraft

    Sycraft [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,460
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    To try and convince people they need to buy new shit.
     
  15. Budman

    Budman I put the Bad in Bad Grandpa!

    Messages:
    18,554
    Joined:
    May 6, 2000
    Any talk of adding 3D to this lol
     
  16. greenman

    greenman Gawd

    Messages:
    588
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Honestly that's probably why: 3D 4k content.
     
    Armenius likes this.
  17. ryamkajr

    ryamkajr n00b

    Messages:
    33
    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    3d is dead for another generation/
     
    SticKx911 likes this.
  18. Thug Esquire

    Thug Esquire [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,253
    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Granted, the thread is really about TV screens, but... I would much rather have a bevy of 21:9 5K2K monitors (38" minimum") at 120Hz and HDR than another 27" anything.
     
    ricson, xmadror and jfreund like this.
  19. nutzo

    nutzo [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,380
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    Just like with cameras, they will keep pushing the pixel count instead of quality.

    At least this should push the cost of 4k screens down even more.
     
    Armenius likes this.
  20. Shmee

    Shmee [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    I just got a 4K TV....
     
  21. DPI

    DPI Nitpick Police

    Messages:
    10,960
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    I used to think the same, 'til I saw this video on a LG OLED in HDR mode in Chrome. Sure, watching an 8K capture on a 4K screen is not the same as watching on an 8K screen (and then there's the Youtube compression), but holy hell it gives an idea what its going to be like.


     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2018
    ricson, Foxyridge, Talyrius and 2 others like this.
  22. nilepez

    nilepez [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,468
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    disagree. I've got a 65" OLED, and I can see pixels if I"m about 5-6' away, which if I could figure out a way to do it, would be where I'd always be. And if I had a 80" or bigger, it'd be even better. Honestly, this is the same place where everyone swore there was no point for 4k and HDR or not, 4k is much sharper than 2k.

    I'm not a fan of HFR movies, but given the latest HDMI specs includes 120hz for 4k (60 for 8k) I think it's safe to say that 120hz 4k will happen.

    AFAIC, it's way to soon to buy these, but so what?
    I think I saw 1080i sets in the late 90s and when did Blu Ray come out? 2006?
    The first 4k projector came out roughly 15 years ago (albeit not for the home). I think Sony's $25,000 4k TV came out in 2011 or 2012. Netflix added 4k around 2014 and I think 4k disks came out in 2016 (or was it 2015?).

    We literally here these same complaints every single time there's a new TV tech release. Just like virtually nobody bought a 1080 TV in the late 90s, almost nobody is going to buy these, but in 5 or 6 years, they will become the norm.

    Now once we get to 8k, I suspect there will be little need for higher resolution, but maybe people will start putting up 200' screens in their basement and want more than 8k. For now, I can see 8k being an upgrade in mid 20s, but for now I'll live with my 4k set ;)


    Me too, but by the time 8k is mainstream, it'll be time to upgrade. When HD sets came out in the 90s, I was buying a 35" SD set (1998). I can remember when everyone said that 720p was all you need (OK some said 1080i) but 1080p was pointless...until it wasn't.
     
    travanx, Anemone and GoldenTiger like this.
  23. nilepez

    nilepez [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,468
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Reminds me of what I saw on a 1080 set in some AV shop in the late 90s. Always nature. I wish I could process 8k. Not sure if it'd look better, but I do have a 5k screen.

    One thing I noticed the more I watched is that the colors are over saturated. But still amazing.
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2018
    Armenius and homernoy like this.
  24. homernoy

    homernoy Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    439
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    For fucks sake, this is the [H]? My Dad told me there was no reason to ever go beyond a few MB, (big at the time of the conversation) of space, because no one could ever use that much space, ever. Let's all be happy companies are pushing for the pinnacle. Why the sarcasm and thumbs down? I don't plan on buying an 8k tv...………...but at least I'll have that choice when they exist
     
  25. Spaceninja

    Spaceninja [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,718
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    If that drops the price of 4k panels then I am all for it. I'm not much of an early adopter anyway, I let others beta test.
     
    Armenius, TripleAgent77 and Anemone like this.
  26. theBrownLlama

    theBrownLlama Gawd

    Messages:
    794
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    too bad there is a lack of content to go with these screens though.

    and considering costs, purchases only comes when insurance on current set ends
     
  27. exlink

    exlink [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,382
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Broadcast television (at least in the US) is still majority 720p/1080i. Some streaming services like Netflix and Amazon provide 4K content, but they utilize approximately 7 GB of data per hour. So a 4K feature length movie utilizes approximately 15GB. 4K content also requires 15-25 Mbps of available bandwidth to stream.

    If you extrapolate that to 8K (which is 4x the number of pixels) then you're looking at approximately 60GB of data to stream a feature length movie at 8K. With many ISPs utilizing data caps this type of streaming won't be very practical. Not to mention you'd likely need 60-100 Mbps of available bandwidth to stream the content which for many plans would require essentially no other internet usage during that time.
     
    Armenius likes this.
  28. cjcox

    cjcox [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,293
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    But before that, Samsung is planning on releasing their new mobile 16K display. First device will be the new Samsung pinky ring with the sharpest 2cm x .5cm display ever made. However, early adopters are upset that it doesn't have a headphone jack and the camera isn't the best in the world.
     
  29. Rob94hawk

    Rob94hawk 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,117
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2002
    Slow down!! I don't even have a 4k TV yet!! I don't even know if Verizon FiOS even offers anything for a 4k tv.
     
  30. nilepez

    nilepez [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    11,468
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    The ISPs that have caps will have to raise their caps. Next time I move, I'm making sure I have an option to use an ISP that doesn't have a cap. Around hear Century Link has that (and with 1Gbps at that), while comcrap has a 1tb cap. I'm always under it, but it's still dumb. Worse than the cap is their pathetic 5Mbps up speed.
     
    Armenius and Anemone like this.
  31. pcgeekesq

    pcgeekesq [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,399
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2012
    Fortunately, those of us who buy discs instead of streaming don't need to worry about these issues. The Blu-Ray standard supports 25, 50, 75, and 100GB discs, with 50GB (double-layer) discs being the current standard for movies.
     
    Armenius, nilepez and GoldenTiger like this.
  32. Jahx

    Jahx [H]Lite

    Messages:
    121
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    I currently work with 3x 43" 4k displays as monitors, side by side. I won't lie, it's a bit of a chore to have to twist slightly to the side either way to use them, but I need the screen real estate, and I tried a 32" 4k and the text was just too small (and as mentioned, I need the real estate). I can't imagine using an 8k screen - I'd need like an 86" screen to keep the same pixel density (someone else can do the math for that, I'm ballparking).
     
    Armenius likes this.
  33. Bigc208

    Bigc208 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    166
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Bring it on. Who cares we barely have 4k broadcast content? If it brings 4k screens down in price I’m all for it. Besides, now I can dream of an 8K, 98 inch Oled screen I won’t be able to afford for the next 10 years!
     
  34. IRSmurf

    IRSmurf 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,312
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Don't sell yourself short. You can finance it for just $99/mo for 10 years and bring it home today! I mean, 640k 8k is all you'll ever need.
     
  35. /dev/null

    /dev/null [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    14,202
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2001
    Meanwhile OTA is still 1080i/720p and my cable company also does mostly 720p.... *sighs*
     
  36. Skylinestar

    Skylinestar Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    487
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2011
    RTX barely works at 1080p. 8k will be slideshow.
     
  37. exlink

    exlink [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,382
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    I understand. But if you're going to shift the focus of your panel production to 8K you'd think that there would be more content than just Blu-ray discs. The majority of content consumption is now through streaming where my aforementioned bottlenecks are prevalent.
     
    Lakados likes this.
  38. GoldenTiger

    GoldenTiger [H]ard as it Gets

    Messages:
    18,815
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Wrong. Go read more recent articles if you even bothered in the first place .
     
  39. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,662
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    They have it piping up in Japan, so the Chinese want it too. China is spending billions upgrading the internet services across the country, in 8 years there will be a huge demand there for it.
     
    travanx and Anemone like this.
  40. shansoft

    shansoft [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,074
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Been using LG UltraFine 5K, I cannot go back to 4K anymore.....

    While doing some reading and coding, 5K font is far easier to read than 4K. Hopefully more 5K 27" panels coming.....
     
    Anemone likes this.