You've got it backwards there. The vision acuity measurement is the other way around. It's measured as "Nominal / Actual"
What she has is probably 20/17, as she can see at 17 feet what most people should see at 20.
Anything better than 20/20 is just "better than average/normal." I get my checkups done to include visual exams relating to head/neurological issues I have to keep an eye on for for progression of symptoms... 20/10 in my left, 20/12 in my right. Considering my mum is nearsighted and my father is farsighted, I got lucky. Either way, I could have had really fucked vision.
Sorry you are correct, I did type that backwards.
No, you've got it wrong: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_acuity
20/17 means *BETTER* vision than 20/20. It's measured in Actual / Average. So 20/17 means that person can see at 20 feet what most see in 17 feet.
So if you really are 20/10, congrats - you have vision that is roughly two times better than average.
Actually he was right, I was wrong. I wanted to say she had better than 20/20 vision but the way I typed it would be worse.
I see where your coming from though, but I think its mostly used because people can relate to the word, and quickly understand what is implied in the use of it.
But that isn't any different than normal vision, by your definition there my normal glasses give me HD vision as they make things clearer. It is nothing but a buzz word.