Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unfortunately we're at least a year away before at least MS does. IMO, they should have done at last year's E3 what Nintendo is doing now.
Pretty confusing conference in my book. They didn't show the new console itself just the controller. If the rumors that the new console runs off a quad core ARM chip I guess that controller could be the console. Now if the rumors are its a 3core IBM PPC w/ ATi R700 then where is the magic box ?
I think Nintendo needs a 2nd press conference to explain what is what. E3 was suppose to answer questions not make them.
Unfortunately we're at least a year away before at least MS does. IMO, they should have done at last year's E3 what Nintendo is doing now.
They detailed that the controller was not doing any of the computing. The processor and video capabilities are housed in the central hardware and then transmitted to the controller. They claim it's latency free.
Wait, so now I waggle a 6.5" tablet controller instead of a wiimote?
Let's see what everyone thinks when they unveil pricing.
No way those controllers don't go for $100+ a piece. Yeah I know there's more than the usual bells and whistles with the inclusion of the touchscreen, but come on. A $100+ controller is still a $100+ controller. You can use a Wii controller, but who's going to want to use a regular Wii controller with this thing?
IMHO Nintendo still just doesn't get it. They lose for years and years on being generations behind on HW so now they're throwing the kitchen sink at the problem which consequently also increases the cost and adds features that people don't necessarily want (see also: waggle/motion controls).
That controller in particular is one of several things I'm hoping is still basically at prototype phase. It's overkill in the wrong direction and I'm simply not seeing a certain ergonomic that you need for a good controller. At least with what media is available.
Just give us a nice, sturdy controller Nintendo. It doesn't have to practically be its own system.
Sub 360 looking graphics.
Terrible, gimmick controller.
Total fail.
Let's see what everyone thinks when they unveil pricing.
No way those controllers don't go for $100+ a piece. Yeah I know there's more than the usual bells and whistles with the inclusion of the touchscreen, but come on. A $100+ controller is still a $100+ controller. You can use a Wii controller, but who's going to want to use a regular Wii controller with this thing?
IMHO Nintendo still just doesn't get it. They lose for years and years on being generations behind on HW so now they're throwing the kitchen sink at the problem which consequently also increases the cost and adds features that people don't necessarily want (see also: waggle/motion controls).
I want some awesome looking Nintendo franchise games, so I hope thing has some serious juice behind it.
I used to think this but I can only save the princess so many times before it becomes incredible boring. SM Galaxy 2 is one of the best platformers out there but it just felt like the same old thing. The only thing that gets me going are when games take me back to that sidescroll greatness (New Super Mario, Donkey Kong Country Returns etc).
100% agreed. I love NSMB and NSMBWii but what else is there?
I've said this a lot before but it bears repeating - I'm done with Mario. I've had enough of Mario. I've lost count of how many Mario games there has been since Mario Bros. but I've played damn near every single one of them, even the halfassed spinoffs like Wario Land (which was the same game). The other 2 constantly churned out Nintendo characters, Link and Samus, I can deal with still....but that is fading as well. Even though I've been fairly content with Metroid: Other M, it's still a poor comparison to the game it's trying to emulate, Super Metroid. Zelda I haven't really cared much about since Wind Waker and that was only because the cel-shading really gave the game a lot of extra life.
I'm really bored with the Nintendo broken record. I know I'm the minority, I know there are new Nintendo fans that haven't played 30 other Mario games before, but come on. A little more difference and ceasing the constant churning out of cookie cutter games would work wonders.
I'm really bored with the Nintendo broken record. I know I'm the minority, I know there are new Nintendo fans that haven't played 30 other Mario games before, but come on. A little more difference and ceasing the constant churning out of cookie cutter games would work wonders.
snip...
My biggest concern is that if the system isn't significantly stronger than the PS3 and 360 that whenever the other new systems hit the Wii U port will be the worst...but will have some kind of lame tacked-on support for the LCD controller.
That's another major concern I have. The 3rd party devs seemed pretty excited for it, but will the new controller just be an afterthought or will they really try to get the most out of it? Especially for cross platform games.
It sounded like the controller screen was mostly to take the place of split screen gaming. I could also see them putting instructions on the screen or something similar, but I doubt we'll be doing a whole lot with it.
IMO, it seems like an even bigger gimmick than motion controls. Sure, it's cool looking, but what the fuck are we going to do with it? It doesn't look comfortable to hold at all; you have to actually move your hand to hit buttions. It's lacking L3 and R3 buttons, which is pretty stupid. The standard controller layout doesn't have enough buttons, why remove two of them?
Only time will tell how this works out, but I definitely won't be buying one unless we get some good 3rd party games.