The first RTM version of Windows 10 wasn't compatible with the new Skylake power features, so yes.
This is just clouding the current issue.
What you speak of is a new feature that simply didn't work. The skylakes still worked just like older versions of Intel chips. The only thing that didn't work was the new feature... of course it did work once INTEL provided the updated driver. MS would not have been in the right to stop providing security updates for all systems using skylake simply because Win 10 predated its release date. The current case with both the new Intel and AMD chips and windows 8.1 is exactly the same. It honestly makes me wonder if MS legal team was really properly briefed on this decision in regards to 8.1 at least. If I was Intel and AMD I would be hoping right now and firing up the legal drafts. MS would imo loose a case brought by either in regards to MS decision in regards to 8.1 almost for sure... and likely for 8 and 7 as well. Believe it or not MS has contracts with hardware manufacturers who provide drivers for their OS. I somehow doubt MS is allowed to arbitrarily decide Intel or AMD couldn't provide drivers for their own hardware. (this is the sort of thing that gets companies broken up)
I mean could AMD even have known MS was going to pull this crap. You can still download Ryzen chipset drivers from AMDs site that clearly list Windows 7 support. The whole thing is just strange. I am wondering if someone at MS really just made such a bone headed decision without even consulting their legal dept.
Last edited: