DoubleTap
2[H]4U
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,917
for sure and much safer only issue tight spaces they are hard to twist and with me i have carpel tunel so they can be a pain i use a mechanics glove to give myself grip to turn them easier.Got to say these compression fitting are so much easier to work with then the old school barb + hose clamp system from when i last did this.
This is not accurate.You probably should run those cards in serial instead of parallel. You will get a small drop in overall flow rate but your temps will be better over all.
The problem with running the cards in parallel is that the water has a lot more time to heat up inside the block, which means parts of the card will end up much hotter and cooling is less efficient. It will be worse with three cards (for every card you have in parallel, the flow rate drops by 50%). I noticed a significant difference between parallel and serial when I had two cards.
If you can feel a difference in temps at the inlet (before the cards) and outlet (after the cards) with your hand, you don't have enough flow through the blocks to cool it efficiently.
At the very least, test it and let us know what you find.
I'm going to have to agree with you on this. Good cooling can still be easily obtained with minimal flow. Sure you are heating up any components downstream of the core but not to any degree that matters. Most of my builds run all components in parallel with relatively low flow.This is not accurate.
You probably should run those cards in serial instead of parallel. You will get a small drop in overall flow rate but your temps will be better over all.
The problem with running the cards in parallel is that the water has a lot more time to heat up inside the block, which means parts of the card will end up much hotter and cooling is less efficient. It will be worse with three cards (for every card you have in parallel, the flow rate drops by 50%). I noticed a significant difference between parallel and serial when I had two cards.
If you can feel a difference in temps at the inlet (before the cards) and outlet (after the cards) with your hand, you don't have enough flow through the blocks to cool it efficiently.
At the very least, test it and let us know what you find.
This is not accurate.
How quiet is it? With those large radiators oriented like that I would almost be tempted to let the water temp go up abit and just let the heat rise out of the build (with minimal airflow)Yeah there seems to be a lot of back and forth about this on various articles and video I've seen and a lot of it depends on how restrictive your blocks are but in general with 3 blocks or more I was reading that you want to at least go partially parallel so that you are not too restricted I have not measured my flow rate but water is returning to the reservoir pretty fast from an "eyeball" test.
But I have also read that at the end of the day the difference is only a couple degrees in most cases and its a pain to tear things apart. My temps so far have only been tested mining ETH at 960mv but my core temps are low 40's and both my junction and memory temps have stayed around or just under 50c. To me this is already good enough that I am not going to sweat the specifics and just run with it. When these were on air I needed to run the fans at 60-70 just to keep my JT from hitting 110 and my memory was usually hitting 90c. I did this build mostly to keep the noise down since the stock coolers are absolute garbage and really annoying and i was getting tired of it especially when it was hotter outside.
How quiet is it? With those large radiators oriented like that I would almost be tempted to let the water temp go up abit and just let the heat rise out of the build (with minimal airflow)
Not really. The way you have it set up, you could just remove three tubes and plug the ports, you'd be done fairly quickly, its the draining and refilling that would take longest (if you need to drain, that is).its a pain to tear things apart.
Based on what? Flow rates make a difference to cooling performance. I tested parallel vs serial running 1080ti in SLI with two D5 pumps + 3x140, 3x120 and 4x120 rads and there was a significant difference. What testing have you done?This is not accurate.
How about 1080ti SLI with a single D5, 2x 360s and a 480 and the same with two 980 Tis and several other SLI variations over the almost 20 years now of watercooling.Not really. The way you have it set up, you could just remove three tubes and plug the ports, you'd be done fairly quickly, its the draining and refilling that would take longest (if you need to drain, that is).
Based on what? Flow rates make a difference to cooling performance. I tested parallel vs serial running 1080ti in SLI with two D5 pumps + 3x140, 3x120 and 4x120 rads and there was a significant difference. What testing have you done?
It may seem counter intuitive but this is not the way the physics of the system works. You need water volume over time and surface area. If you assume a system is balanced (the heat plate can transmit energy at a sufficient rate to the coolant and the rads have enough surface area, etc) these are the only things that can make a difference. Rads only increase the dissipation of the heat from the closed loop, again, by available surface area and flow. So all things equal we're left with flow.The water spending longer in the waterblocks separately is almost guaranteed to be a net gain if the flow isn't abysmal and you have enough rad/fans in the loop versus one card getting hotter water that doesn't allow it to shed as much heat.
It may seem counter intuitive but this is not the way the physics of the system works. You need water volume over time and surface area. If you assume a system is balanced (the heat plate can transmit energy at a sufficient rate to the coolant and the rads have enough surface area, etc) these are the only things that can make a difference. Rads only increase the dissipation of the heat from the closed loop, again, by available surface area and flow. So all things equal we're left with flow.
I recently took my loop apart because of a rubbery growth afflicting all of my blocks.
View attachment 390430
I was down to .2gpm after about a week of it dropping pretty steadily so I got to see this first hand. My water temps skyrocketed from an average of 28c while gaming to 42c. My GPU was hitting 60c at times (took me a few days to get pads). And that's with 2 huge Monsta 480s with 12 fans and a MORA3 with 4 200mm fans and 4 D5 pumps.
Long story short: your water is one 'thing' in your loop. Over time it's temperature will equalize the entire system up to it's total energy capacity. Test this yourself with a temp sensor at the intake side of the reservoir and one at the inlet of your rads. My pair are only 1c difference even with that low flow described above.
I have Tygon rubber tubing and was using Mayhem's Nuke XT-1 concentrate. The only thing I can think of is it was biological OR something related to my Little Giant pump since it has a white housing and compressor wheel and was making some noise before I pulled it. But I seriously doubt a pump design for lifting chemicals had a reaction with propylene glycol and whatever else is in Nuke. I'm running just the D5s for now.Biologic or plasticizer?
It was probably the tygon, or the tygon, nuke combination. Im not certain which. I stopped using tygon because of white buildup in my loops. I tried 3 different kinds and ended up having the same white crap in my tubes and blocks. I tried 1/2inx3/4in clear, silver anti-microbial and black uv resistant. The black took the longest to cloud up, the clear the fastest. I switched to primochill lrt and pt-nuke and never had it again(6-7yrs).I have Tygon rubber tubing and was using Mayhem's Nuke XT-1 concentrate. The only thing I can think of is it was biological OR something related to my Little Giant pump since it has a white housing and compressor wheel and was making some noise before I pulled it. But I seriously doubt a pump design for lifting chemicals had a reaction with propylene glycol and whatever else is in Nuke. I'm running just the D5s for now.
View attachment 390535
This, I dropped Tygon back in the 2000s due to various issues over time and Primochill LRT has been my favorite to use by far.It was probably the tygon, or the tygon, nuke combination. Im not certain which. I stopped using tygon because of white buildup in my loops. I tried 3 different kinds and ended up having the same white crap in my tubes and blocks. I tried 1/2inx3/4in clear, silver anti-microbial and black uv resistant. The black took the longest to cloud up, the clear the fastest. I switched to primochill lrt and pt-nuke and never had it again(6-7yrs).
Switched to hardline and koolance fluid after that and haven't seen it in this loop either.
So my advice is flush your rads and blocks with clr (5 mins sit, then shake and rinse really well). Scrub your pump and res with distilled and dish soap and replace your tubing with something other than tygon.
See my edit. Thats not from the tubing.I'm no materials expert but I have a hard time believing vulcanized rubber would react with anything in a 10% solution of distilled water. It's the black tubing, not clear.
https://www.usplastic.com/catalog/files/specsheets/NorpreneA60G.pdf
Nice rig and temps. I have my top rad set as exhaust. Now I'm thinking I should try it as an intake as well.Here is the finished product for the time being. While I still intend to go with metal tubing (post 1744), I had issues chamfering the tubes correctly and ended up destroying a few inner o-rings. Additionally, I only have one cross fitting on hand (used to straighten out the runs). While packages generally take 4-6 weeks to get here, I figure why not use the ZMT I had laying around.
I will tackle the metal tubes again once the next GPU comes in.
O11 Dynamic XL
Asus X570 Tuf Gaming
3900X
32GB Trident Z
EVGA 1080 Ti FE w/EKWB water block
Rads - EKWB Coolstream PE/XE w/NF A12x25 (both set to intake)
Idle temps are
CPU 34C
GPU 24C
25 min full load w/Prime 95 (small ffts) & MSI Kombustor (burn-in)
CPU 71C
GPU 41C
View attachment 276321View attachment 276322View attachment 276323
Thanks. I was so glad I managed to fit a EK360 XE at the bottom and a 360GTS on the sideLove the color scheme!
Pictures aren't the best, but all I have is my phone camera.
Lian LI 011 XL ROGWhat case is that?!
Lian LI 011 XL ROG