NEC 23" IPS EA231WMi

Put it this way: I always knew their was tint. I could see it straight out. In fact I can see it on all pics posted of NEC Ea231wmi by their owners so far.

It was never a huge issue because the tint was mild. The picture quality of the monitor and color accuracy negates this fault (which seems to be virtually unavoidable for IPS panels nowadays). Why is this?

IF you are looking to get an IPS panel please note the following:

1) All well known companies now use LG Display panels exclusively for their IPS monitors.
2) There are a huge amount of posts re: tinting in Dell U2410, HP 2475 (H-IPS all made by LG Display)
3) Shamefully their are even quite a few reports re: tinting in NEC 2490,2690,3090 and Eizo sx2462. I say shaemfully because NEC 2490 costs upwards of $1000 US and Eizo more than $1800 US. For this price you expect perfection. Again all monitors use LG panels.
4) The old Planar PX2611 and Doublesight ds265 have issues with this also. Again IPS and manufactured by LG.

SO What am I trying to say?
Bottom line:

LG have problems with their manufacturing of IPS panels. It is well known, wide spread and 100% unavoidable if you do not
1) Get lucky with lesser monitors
2) Buy NEC wuxi range with color comp feature that apparently lessens this tint (but not fully)
3) Buy top of the line NEC spectraview or Eizo CG range where panels are hand picked.

If even $1800 + monitors have this problem and you want the benefits of IPS, this problem is REALLY hard to avoid

I personally think the benefits of IPS outweigh mild tint (especially when you consider this monitor only costs $360).

The NEC EA231wmi's are having much fewer reports of uniformity issues (so we can assume they are milder/non issues that do not bother even the uber picky people on [H]).

I think 3 people had more serious tint issues. If you are in N.America always buy from a store where you can return no questions asked.

Mine is mild to the extent that I can still heartily recommend this monitor because image for me is just wow (and I had perfect factory settings out of the box). (and it looks great on my desk! :D)

EDIT: Just to clarify. The testing was done to confirm for me that I wasn't seeing things i.e. that my eyes were not deceiving me. I was merely trying to validate my subjective impression that there was minor tint. And it's just that - minor. So yes I am still satisified
Its still a very nice monitor :)
 
Last edited:
Well, I got my monitor today and I have to say, this being my first LCD monitor I'm not sure what to look for to deem if it is worthy to keep or if I need to return it. How do I test for all the stuff I've read about in this thread such as uniformity, bleeding, dead pixels, etc? Anyone have a link that explains the process? Thanks.
 
Well, I got my monitor today and I have to say, this being my first LCD monitor I'm not sure what to look for to deem if it is worthy to keep or if I need to return it. How do I test for all the stuff I've read about in this thread such as uniformity, bleeding, dead pixels, etc? Anyone have a link that explains the process? Thanks.

Seems to me you should let your eyes be the judge. If the monitor works well and looks good to you - for whatever purposes you use it - then it's a keeper. If you go looking for problems you'll definitely find them, no matter what the monitor.
 
HowzThat,

Thanks for the feedback. This forum is full of great information and lots of first hand opinions. The down side is that it's enough to drive you crazy, or at least make you paranoid. What's the saying, "ignorance is bliss"?
 
Seems to me you should let your eyes be the judge. If the monitor works well and looks good to you - for whatever purposes you use it - then it's a keeper. If you go looking for problems you'll definitely find them, no matter what the monitor.

+1 to this. Always let your eyes be the judge. You will know a good screen when you see it (especially when its next to a cheap TN! ;))

I can tell you how you need to test, but I don't have the time to go in detail ATM (i'm at work:)).

To summarize you really need a calibrator for major testing (cost is around $150 for a good one).

Go to lagom.nl to and see if your screen passes all their tests. This is base line requirement for any monitor to pass to be considered "okay-good".

Set up a blank screensaver to check for backlight bleed. Take a photo at various exposures to verify. It usually comes up quite clearly at low-medium exposure. High exposure shots will distort/exacerbate any issues to a IMO too greater extent.

IF you dont' have calibrator, set a plain light-mid grey and white background to check for colour tint across the screen which is caused by uneven backlight distribution. If it is really bad, you will have an obvious pink/green-yellow tint to your screen. Usually green on the right (i have a mild case of this) and pink on the right (really hard to see on mine).

Got to do some work now!:D
 
noob's first post here.

Because of this thread, I pulled the trigger and bought the NEC 23" IPS. I felt obligated to make an account with [H] and thank everyone who has contributed in the last 35 pages because I am extremely pleased with this monitor.

Additionally, over the course of reading this thread I noticed a hand full of people wondering if it is good for gaming (due to a 14ms response time). Out of pure curiousity, I plugged in my xbox 360 via VGA HD AV cable and played Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2. I noticed zero ghosting or any type of lag.
 
I ordered one yesterday too. The monitor really has exactly everything I'm looking for - right now my only (slight) worry is the tint problem, as I do a lot of photoshop.

My second choice was the 2408WFP, but I didn't want the extra wide gamut.
 
First off, since this hasn't been bumped since Dec 24th.....Merry X-mas all!

Finally got mine... and it looks like it might be going back. No dead pixels, backlight unformity is good enough for me, but color uniformity is very off and there's quite a bit of backlight bleed in the lower left (can't see it on these photos). I'm used to backlight bleeding (or that washed out look) with IPS panels as my Dell 2005fpw has it, but the left corner is significantly worse than the others. The color uniformity is the real deal breaker though, I can see it even on non-plain backgrounds.

Color uniformity, out of camera:

16k9ruh.jpg


Color uniformity, contrast boosted:

fmnvnr.jpg


Pretty obvious blue/yellow bias going on :(

Edit - Revision is 1A, build date is November 2009 for those who are curious.

Wow, monkey, you hit the nail on the head with ALL of those pointers you mention, incl the 2005FPW, which I'm also coming from. I'm on the fence right now as to whether or not to keep this, due to the very reason you're mentioning w/ regards to color uniformity issues (although as HowzThat points out, it could be, and looks like, the problem may actually be relegated to backlight uniformity). To boot, the image you took looks EXACTLY like mine, too :(

My question now is: Is this a problem on EVERYONE's panel? Or did some lucky 2% of people actually get one w/o backlight/color uniformity issues? B/c, quite honestly, if it wasn't for the uniformity issues, this would be THE true successor to the 2005FPW, and possibly, THE best 23"-24" LCD monitor out there for the price.

Meanwhile said:

Thanks for the head's up, Meanwhile! Will play around w/ those profiles to see if it makes any tiny bit of difference in my liking of this monitor.
 
I'm also in the same boat. Probably should have made an account years ago (though I'm more of a reader than a writer), but the info here definitely deserves thanks--I believe my quest for a 2005FPW replacement has finally ended! :cool:

..now to try and scoop one for ≤ $300 shipped, it looks like the price ping-pongs a lot. :p

noob's first post here.

Because of this thread, I pulled the trigger and bought the NEC 23" IPS. I felt obligated to make an account with [H] and thank everyone who has contributed in the last 35 pages because I am extremely pleased with this monitor.

Additionally, over the course of reading this thread I noticed a hand full of people wondering if it is good for gaming (due to a 14ms response time). Out of pure curiousity, I plugged in my xbox 360 via VGA HD AV cable and played Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2. I noticed zero ghosting or any type of lag.
 
Yeah,

It will be no secret for those who've slogged through this whole thread, that I've upgraded to the EA231WMi, from a 2005FPW.

The Dell was great, for its time.

But the NEC was a perfect successor, for me, since it was larger, has a 16:9 aspect ratio, maintains nearly the same pixel size, is HDCP compliant, and did cost me less than the 20005FPW, four or five years ago, even without considering the massive State Monetary Inflation over that period.

For me, there has been no perceived uniformity issues in everyday use with Photoshop or video playback. But, the text clarity seems a little better when kept under 50% in the Contrast area of the OSD menu.

As a Mac Mini user, I suppose the only other display that I may have consider as besting the NEC, is the 24" ACD. But it's about $800, and I seem to have a pattern of upgrading stuff every four years, or so, and the NEC cuts the price in half, or better.

Peace to you all,
C. Livingstone
 
It will be no secret for those who've slogged through this whole thread, that I've upgraded to the EA231WMi, from a 2005FPW.

...

For me, there has been no perceived uniformity issues in everyday use with Photoshop or video playback.

Hi Chris. I believe I sent you a PM about a month or so ago, since we come from the same boat (2005FPW) asking about the uniformity issues. You said you don't perceive any. However, I was wondering if you had taken any pix of a simple gray background and, if so, could be so kind as to share it w/ us.

Right now I'm leaning towards returning this monitor in the hopes of getting an exchange. Perhaps these NEC's aren't ALL bad. It's very hard to judge since most people that come here, do it mostly to confirm the horror stories. Those w/o issues live free in harmony and probably aren't even aware of this thread, or any other problems.

Am gonna check out Buy.com's return policy. In the meantime, if anyone else cares to share their return-trip experiences, please, please do post!

PS Chris, did you happen to download that one dude's color calibrated profiles from rapidshare a couple months back? Seems the dude uploaded it as a "ten time only" download feature and it has been long dead....
 
Wow, monkey, you hit the nail on the head with ALL of those pointers you mention, incl the 2005FPW, which I'm also coming from. I'm on the fence right now as to whether or not to keep this, due to the very reason you're mentioning w/ regards to color uniformity issues (although as HowzThat points out, it could be, and looks like, the problem may actually be relegated to backlight uniformity). To boot, the image you took looks EXACTLY like mine, too :(

My question now is: Is this a problem on EVERYONE's panel? Or did some lucky 2% of people actually get one w/o backlight/color uniformity issues? B/c, quite honestly, if it wasn't for the uniformity issues, this would be THE true successor to the 2005FPW, and possibly, THE best 23"-24" LCD monitor out there for the price.

I'm not so sure the color uniformity is linked to backlight uniformity. I think my monitor has pretty good backlight uniformity to be honest, especially compared to others I've seen on here and from reviews. Mine isn't so great on the sides, but I don't think any panel of this type will be for now and I'm more than willing to put up with backlight uniformity issues as long as the color is somewhat even across the panel.

I do believe there are good panels out there and I think HowzThat's is actually pretty good in terms of the color uniformity. It's really a shame mine isn't because I love everything else about it, and the contrast numbers are especially amazing for this cheap of an IPS. Speaking of that, comparing the NEC side by side with my 2005fpw, I'd have to say I definitely prefer the NEC, especially for video content. The contrast ratio is the real factor here and there's a depth to HD content on the NEC that I can't get with my 2005fpw, no matter how well it's calibrated.

As far as returns, I got mine from Provantage but right now am initiating an exchange with NEC. I showed them the photos and they're going to cover it under the warranty which is great, but they are temp. out of stock so I'll need to call in Monday to see what the ETA is. I'd much rather deal with NEC as they will pay for return shipping as well as getting the new one out to me quickly, whereas Provantage won't.
 
Sure,

XMonkey, in one of my posts in this thread I've already linked to a couple of photos, one was the NEC with a plain grey desktop pattern and the other had the NEC side-by-side with the Dell.

I think those links are still good to the photos that are still intact on my .Mac server/space. The photos were taken with a down-and-dirty ultra-compact camera, with auto-everything.

Maybe I'll look for the links in this thread, if you don't find them. They may have been shortened with "tiny.cc".

Anyway, if you're not happy with your particular EA231WMi, then it really wouldn't matter how happy someone else was with theirs, I would think.

I was happy with the 2005FPW, until the NEC came along, for the reasons I've mentioned.

So, please let us all hear what finally works for you, to your level of satisfaction.

Peace,
C. Livingstone
 
I just ordered one of these from provantage for 340 including shipping. Hoping to receive it some time next week and be able to post some pics/screens. From what I've gathered from this thread as a monitor noob, the displayport input option is best. The laptop I'm using is a 2008 macbook that only has a mini-dvi out.

Am I going to have to go mini-dvi/dvi then dvi to displayport or is it possible to go directly from mini dvi to displayport? I've searched apple's store and couldn't find anything similar to the later so I'm assuming I'll have to go with the more complicated option. I guess using the dvi connection would be fine too.
 
wheres the best place to get this cheap?



You can buy directly from the NEC website, listed price is $339. Or you type in your address here to find the closest reseller. I personally went through dell.com and talked the rep into waiving the shipping and handling fee.

here are a few websites:
http://www.amazon.com/NEC-EA231WMI-...1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1261879987&sr=8-1
http://www.provantage.com/nec-display-solutions-ea231wmi-bk~7NECL0CN.htm
http://www.buy.com/prod/nec-display...nitor-23-1920-x-1080/q/loc/101/211579088.html
 
As an Amazon Associate, HardForum may earn from qualifying purchases.
OK,

Here they are, for viewing on your Browser, rather than the other link, which allows for downloading, only:

http://idisk.mac.com/newjerusalemtimes-Public/SANY0017.JPG

http://idisk.mac.com/newjerusalemtimes-Public/SANY0027.JPG

Peace to you all,
C. Livingstone

Thanks for that. Yeah, I DEFINITELY notice the poor uniformity in your 2nd screen as well. I'm just hoping that, if I decide to ship this back, I don't get the same thing, or one that's worse. As I said, I'd wish those people that did manage to get one w/o ANY visible uniformity issues (if they exist :p) would post up their pix as proof. Thus far, I don't believe I've seen any w/o said issue.

BTW, I neglected to mention in my previous post, I took the "black level test" ( here ) and I was amazed that I saw the entire first row and first black color displayed w/ this NEC monitor! With my 2005FPW, I could make out the first row, but just BARELY. Here, it's as clear as day.

Also, to me at least, it seems this monitor has less ghosting or blur, compared w/ the 2005FPW, especially when scrolling down webpages. Coming from a CRT -> to the Dell, input lag, or ghosting, w/e it's called, was one of the first thing I noticed w/ LCD's. W/ the NEC, it seems visibly less pronounced. Definitely an improvement, IMO.

Gah! If it just wasn't for the damn color uniformity issue.......
 
Well,

Maybe the EA231WMi isn't the one for you.

The S-PVA LaCie 324 is rated very well for mid-range color professionals, at around $850, without the calibrator.

Peace to you all,
C. Livingstone
 
the funny thing is..i have used my 2005fpw for i don't know how many years..and am only now noticing a slight red cast on the right hand side of the screen when i've got a white background up. maybe i'm just lucky and am not sensitive to that type stuff, but honestly..of all the shortcomings of every LCD technology..i'll gladly take a color cast over everything else.

[edit]

the greatest would be if gfx card manufacturers made it so we could put a shader over the whole screen..that would fix wide gamut bull$hit and let us tweak out stuff like panel uniformity and color casts too! (just a little daydreaming..hehe)
 
Last edited:
Firstly, let me thank everyone in this forum for helping me pick a monitor. I joined today to throw in my two bits here.

I got one of these from Buy.com for $305 or so. It showed up with a rather definite tint on the left side. Passed all the tests on Lagom.nl to my satisfaction, but on near-white backgrounds (the firefox 'page not found' was where i first noticed it), the left side of the monitor has a distinct pink tinge. Going to keep it for a couple weeks and see if it lessens up at all, but I'll probably be trying my luck with another one if it doesn't. No dead pixels or dirt in the panel though.
 
the funny thing is..i have used my 2005fpw for i don't know how many years..and am only now noticing a slight red cast on the right hand side of the screen when i've got a white background up. maybe i'm just lucky and am not sensitive to that type stuff, but honestly..of all the shortcomings of every LCD technology..i'll gladly take a color cast over everything else.

[edit]

the greatest would be if gfx card manufacturers made it so we could put a shader over the whole screen..that would fix wide gamut bull$hit and let us tweak out stuff like panel uniformity and color casts too! (just a little daydreaming..hehe)

so i smashed my head into the wall all day and got my gfx programming friend interested in this and we might be able to do the shader over the full screen thing >.< just hope we got enuf vram bandwidth to do it! :D
 
1) All well known companies now use LG Display panels exclusively for their IPS monitors.

Sorry if this has been answered elsewhere, but where do the panels made by IPS Alpha go, just TVs, like Panasonics LCDs? Is LG making monitors under license by IPS or something?
 
where do the panels made by IPS Alpha go
Panasonic & Hitachi TVs. Hitachi tend to have many more options to tweak and may make better computer monitors as Panasonics tend to have too much non defeatable processing, but Hitachi have got a reputation for poor build quality so it's not a brand to recommend easily.

I think LG-Display do licence IPS, Hitachi who hold the original patent? and it may have been a joint venture between Japanese companies to develop the technology. I think it was either NEC or Fujitsu who used to manufacture supply the panel for Eizo's older top of the range colour critical monitor.
 
Dang, the price on the EA231WMI seems to be creeping up again.

Buy.com: 366.99
Provantage.com: $339.98
 
Hey,

Thanks, Intelman. That profile even works on my Intel Mac Mini.

I don't know if I'll use it much, though, as it seems a lot like the canned AppleRGB one that I've been using lately.

But it's very cool to share custom calibrated ICC profiles.

Peace to you all,
C. Livingstone
 
Hey,

Thanks, Intelman. That profile even works on my Intel Mac Mini.

I don't know if I'll use it much, though, as it seems a lot like the canned AppleRGB one that I've been using lately.

But it's very cool to share custom calibrated ICC profiles.

Peace to you all,
C. Livingstone

yea i think sharing ICC profiles is really great. i like how TFTcentral is compiling th at database, and there's that thread going on here.

Here is the ICC profile I use.

http://localhostr.com/files/e8bfa7/Calibrated_12-23-2009_1.zip

It was obtained using the i1 Display 2

This monitor is amazing. It is probably even more amazing coming from a HP w2207 (a TN display). Games continue to work well, and text proves to be quite clear.

could you also provide your monitor settings for that profile? like brightness/contrast/red/green/blue settings (or if it was set on sRGB or native)
 
yea i think sharing ICC profiles is really great. i like how TFTcentral is compiling th at database, and there's that thread going on here.



could you also provide your monitor settings for that profile? like brightness/contrast/red/green/blue settings (or if it was set on sRGB or native)

Yeah sorry. The Brightness is at 50%. Color mode is at Native. Everything else is at default.
 
n00b question: when I use e.g. TFTCentral's color profiles, all I need to do is to set the monitor to Native or sRGB and then set the respective color profile as default? Will this only affect programs that are color managed?

Just got mine today. On white background I can't see any pink or green change, but for now I'm probably just blind to it. Or maybe little but I don't know if I just imagine it...
 
Last edited:
Well...I was doing a bit of post purchase validation last week. :)
Yes I was already happy with my monitor but I just had to see how it compared etc etc. Confirmation and all that.:D

Well I thought I would mosey on down to the local store and check me out some NEC 2490's again. I was considering these at one stage and they were/are reputed to be the best displays ATM.

Ultimate comparison? Maybe
Preparing to be let down by my NECEA231? You betchya :D

Now before I continue let me just say that pic quality of the EA231 was in my head but I see it everyday so its kinda fresh and I tested veiwing angles of the monitor to excess.

Talk about post purchase validation!!!:D

I don't know whether I was shocked at the less than stellar image quality of the 2490wuxi x5 or whether I was rapt that my EA231 (in my mind at least) matched the 2490wuxi in picture quality/viewing angles/graininess.

The NEC 2490wuxi upon close inspection did have grain and compared to EA231 looked to be about the same level of coating. IOW grain would not have been avoidable by going the NEC 2490 route.

Viewing angles: Wow. This is were the 2490 is supposed to shine esp. with the A-TW polarizier. So disappointing! At 170 up/down left/right I was seeing a semi washed out picture with (and this is hard to believe) white glow! Does the A-TW polarizer need to be turned on/activated or something? Maybe the shop forgot to do this with their 2490wuxi's?
Because viewing angles sure weren't better than the EA231wmi and on reflection may have even been worse!

Picture quality head on was about the same. This was a tie. I could not seperate the monitors. The EA231 would have had to be side by side to discern any differences.

Needless to say I am grinning. :D And I re-asses my view of the NEC2490wuxi. The Apple Cinema Display is the king of the pro monitors (but its Apple EWW!:))
And I re-confirm my opinion that the 2490wuxi is overpriced (cos the advanced electronics don't seem to making for a better picture).
 
n00b question: when I use e.g. TFTCentral's color profiles, all I need to do is to set the monitor to Native or sRGB and then set the respective color profile as default? Will this only affect programs that are color managed?

Good question. I ASSUME what you need to do is to download and extract the color profile, right-click on the .ICC file name, and choose "Install." I did that, and also went into my monitor's "Color Management" tab under Display Properties -> Settings, and Added it to the list. Honestly, I don't see any difference between pre-calibrated and calibrated ICC file. So maybe I/we're doing something wrong...

Can anyone inform us the proper way for the color profiles to take affect?

Just got mine today. On white background I can't see any pink or green change, but for now I'm probably just blind to it. Or maybe little but I don't know if I just imagine it...

It's best to try it on a neutral gray background (say, 128 value for Red, Blue, Green in PhotoShop). Put it on fullscreen, step back from the monitor and take note.

As for mine, I'm definitely leaning more towards an exchange. With w/ a ton of luck, maybe I'll get one w/ almost no tint or uniformity issues. But, again, on mine, I definitely notice it on white and gray backgrounds (sadly meaning I see it all the time w/ websites and design app's). If all else fails, I'm looking at the cPVA panel, Samsung F2380. Though that seems to have its' own set of issues.

Anyone recall such huge and blatantly obvious issues inherit in CRT monitors? I sure as hell don't!
 
Has anybody found an official driver for this monitor yet?

I found this and it seems to work but it's not very official looking.
http://www.nodevice.com/driver/MultiSync_EA231WMi__DisplayPort_/get67064.html
I installed that driver on Windows XP, and then checked for updates. Windows Update found an official NEC driver for the monitor once that one was installed. Haven't had time to play with it yet and see if it makes a difference.
Odd, Necdisplay.com only says "Drivers for the selected product do no exist."
http://www.necdisplay.com/SupportCenter/DriverFinder/
 
Good question. I ASSUME what you need to do is to download and extract the color profile, right-click on the .ICC file name, and choose "Install." I did that, and also went into my monitor's "Color Management" tab under Display Properties -> Settings, and Added it to the list. Honestly, I don't see any difference between pre-calibrated and calibrated ICC file. So maybe I/we're doing something wrong...
Yes, I know how to do that, but I was too wondering if it's just that easy.

Btw, right-click -> "Install" only copies the file to (Vista/XP) C:\WINDOWS\system32\spool\drivers\color folder. Or at least it does that.

It's best to try it on a neutral gray background (say, 128 value for Red, Blue, Green in PhotoShop). Put it on fullscreen, step back from the monitor and take note.
Tried with grey (128,128,128). The right side is a bit yellow or green (surprise, surprise). No idea if this is much or little.
 
Last edited:
No idea if this is much or little.

Only way to tell for sure is with a calibrator.

Can anyone inform us the proper way for the color profiles to take affect?

I was always under the impression that you needed need some form of calibration program to load the color managed profile on startup.

This could also explain why color managed profiles are disabled for any sort of games (the calibration program and the game are conflicting programs and are incompatible with one another). EDIT: Can someone with more experience please confirm?

I know for almost certain that one persons colour managed profile is unlikely to yield the same results on one persons monitor as another due to panel sample variance, backlight uniformity etc. So don't expect perfect color fidelity.

I shall however endeavour to provide my calibrated profiles for general consumption along with their relevant settings in OSD (as soon as I return home from work).:)
 
As promised:

http://users.tpg.com.au/avh16//NECEA231black015_1.icm

I achieved v.good color accuracy (u deltaE < 0.4) with this profile and black level of 0.15 and contrast of around 800:1. You can get better than this though as TFT central has already shown in their review. They went down to udE of 0.2 and black level of 0.14.Wow!:D

Please be aware that results on your monitor WILL vary.

On a side note: I have noticed that uniformity of my monitor is at its worst when first powered on. Any tint appears to fade after about half an hour of use. The backlight obviously needs time to warm up.

I have heard reports from other people that have uniformity issues that their monitors appear to get better with this problem over time. Maybe IPS monitors need to be worn in?

EDIT: Crap! Sorry forgot to provide OSD settings: Here they are:

Brightness: 30
Contrast: 50
User Mode 1: (which is why I am not getting the same results as TFTcentral, you need to use Native mode for their profile - it provides the best results. I know, i know I should have used Native mode but I'm too lazy to redo the calibration in Native) :D
Red: 100%
Green: 89.6% (yes the screen was too green in this mode - as a lot of other people have reported - sRGb for me though is a different story)
Blue: 95.8%

Eco Mode is OFF
Auto Brightness is OFF

Or just use SRGB mode at 30% brightness. Prad was getting bad results in this mode because they used factory default settings. With a simple tweak of the brightness setting, I achived excellent color accuracy in this mode. To my thinking everyone else should too.
 
Last edited:
for those that asked how to apply an icc/icm profile.. the default windows way of doing it is a really convoluted and unclear process on 7 and doesnt seem to work at all on vista, so what i have found is the best thing to do.. just google DisplayProfile.exe. that will apply the profile to your graphics card's LUT. you can then start Monitor Calibration Wizard after you have loaded the icc/icm and save the current profile (because MCW reads ur gfx card's LUT). and now you've got MCW which applies the profile at all times.. at bootup, even in games.

[edit]

displayprofile:
http://www.xrite.com/product_overview.aspx?ID=757&Action=support&SoftwareID=539

monitor calibration wizard:
http://www.hex2bit.com/products/product_mcw.asp
 
Last edited:
Back
Top