PontiacGTX
Gawd
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 808
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I ran image quality comparison between 2 monitors (same models), and couple of older games - like farcry, quake 4, doom3 (possibly one or 2 more)That's interesting stuff your working with and being AMD since HD 4890 XT I managed to not sale two of my cards R 9 - 280 /290x both Tri X models which I have used the 290x with my Ryzen 5 3600 as to test DX 12 and I noticed right off how different Hawaii looks in Image Quality vs Polaris and Navi as to me Hawaii looks better .. but anyways there are a lot people still running Hawaii and older cards as I have requests for more 3600 / 290x videos on you tube as I need to rip RX 5700 out for that to happen or build my 3rd 3600 platform for older cards or maybe 3700x this time .
I enjoyed the video .
I ran image quality comparison between 2 monitors (same models), and couple of older games - like farcry, quake 4, doom3 (possibly one or 2 more)
Radeon x1950 Pro 512M AGP vs Fury-X
Not to mention Fury-x was not displaying some effects at all, it looked quite meh, and low quality poly, textures vs what I saw on lower resolution with x1950 Pro card.
1024x768 or 1280x768 were giving me same look in jaggies etc vs 1080p 1440p on fury-x
In terms of image quality, i think most of it is dependent on your internal settings (as they do differ by defaults on some cards) i.e. my old 290x had defined to high quality vs performance, so you may not necessarily getting what you get.
watching the vid now.
when you make screenshots on both x1950 or fury-x it looks the same (farcry)I'd really love to see an outlet tackle this IQ testing again. Have heard a few say there is no difference these days but it would be good to see evidence-based testing. I don't have my 290X for now so can't test between Vega and 290X (which is considered to have great IQ) or I'd volunteer for duty!
what do you have that can be ran on older gpu's and newer systems?I don't have farcry, and it would take me a significant time to download since all I have available is satellite internet.
that would be outside of my realms, and not good test.No clue, rocket league . I'll have to check as I put a new SSD and wiped just about everything. My son has a few games installed on his desktop I could test with, just have to see which ones.
Edit:. Just so you know I tend to do more media encoding and software development than gaming, hence the lack of games.
I ran image quality comparison between 2 monitors (same models), and couple of older games - like farcry, quake 4, doom3 (possibly one or 2 more)
Radeon x1950 Pro 512M AGP vs Fury-X
Not to mention Fury-x was not displaying some effects at all, it looked quite meh, and low quality poly, textures vs what I saw on lower resolution with x1950 Pro card.
1024x768 or 1280x768 were giving me same look in jaggies etc vs 1080p 1440p on fury-x
In terms of image quality, i think most of it is dependent on your internal settings (as they do differ by defaults on some cards) i.e. my old 290x had defined to high quality vs performance, so you may not necessarily getting what you get.
watching the vid now.