My first SSD ?

Discussion in 'SSDs & Data Storage' started by Susquehannock, Sep 13, 2018 at 3:27 PM.

  1. Susquehannock

    Susquehannock 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,966
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Time for me to finally jump on the SSD train. Plan to migrate Win10 and a few favorite games from my spinner.

    What is good in the 500gb range?

    Thanks

    -

    P.S. -- cannot do M.2 with my current system.
     
  2. NoOther

    NoOther [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,665
    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    I highly suggest a Samsung EVO.
     
    Lateralus, auntjemima and Wyodiver like this.
  3. Susquehannock

    Susquehannock 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,966
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    That was one of my top choices so far. EVO 860 vs Crucial MX 500.
     
  4. NoOther

    NoOther [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,665
    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Honestly, both are good choices, but my preference would be the Samsung. I have 5 Samsung SSDs, 3 PROs, 2 EVOs. I also have a Crucial M4. I have had most of them for several years. All have performed very well for me and no issues with any of them so far.
     
    drescherjm and Susquehannock like this.
  5. BlueLineSwinger

    BlueLineSwinger Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    460
    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Either of the above, or the WD Black/Sandisk Extreme Pro (they're the same drive). There have been some really good deals on the Evo popping up lately.

    SATA is fine, there's nothing a typical desktop/laptop does that makes NVMe worth the additional cost.
     
  6. DrLobotomy

    DrLobotomy [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,939
    Joined:
    May 19, 2016
  7. PliotronX

    PliotronX [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,981
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2000
    I'm all about crucial, they have been top performers (aside from BX200 but the BX300 made up for it) with consistently good prices. I use an 850 Evo without trouble at work nor have any problems with Samsung SSDs in other machines they have been used in. Can't really lose with any of them. Even the 750 Evo is good if you can find one for cheap.
     
  8. tedych

    tedych [H]Lite

    Messages:
    70
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    MX500 has more SLC (dynamic) cache, about 40GB, against 22GB (18GB of which dynamic) for 860 EVO. WHen the drive is half or so full, I guess both reduce slc cache to comparable levels.
    Overall tests give the 860 evo a small advantage which... is highly unlikely anyone could notice. Still, I went for the 860 evo myself too :) . If the price difference was larger, I'd go with the crucial though.
    I doubt there is anything in the SATA segment that is worth having in mind other than these two, at least in the 250 and 500GB range. There are many that are cheaper but not by much and they offer lower IOPS and overall reliability.
     
  9. Bowman15

    Bowman15 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,134
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2015
  10. cageman

    cageman n00bie

    Messages:
    63
    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    +1 for Samsung. Never experienced any issue.
     
  11. SolarBeam

    SolarBeam n00bie

    Messages:
    20
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2016
    Everything depends on the budget that you have. I would suggest you to look at Samsung 860 Evo and Pro, WD Blue 3D NAND, Toshiba Q300, and Crucial MX500. IMHO, the best choice would be Samsung 860 Pro.
     
  12. Wyodiver

    Wyodiver [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,923
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2004

    When I installed SSDs to my T3500 I was worried about SATA II slowing them down. Maybe it does. But,still, the speed increase over spinners is just amazing.
     
    horrorshow and Susquehannock like this.
  13. BlueFireIce

    BlueFireIce [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,981
    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Just about any known brand will be a huge jump as a first SSD. I have lots, and run Sammy, Crucial/Micron and SanDisk in my personal stuff. I used to be all about sammy as they benched the best, and honestly in the early days they were, because back then there were all sorts of controller and crappy NAND issues. That however is not the case anymore. My Pfsense box has the super cheap SanDisk, so does my media server along with a M500, my gaming rig has a 1TB EVO and 1TB Crucial, my laptop has a 1TB EVO and 2TB Micron. They all feel the same in day to day use, even though on paper the EVO should kill everything else, funny enough, my server that boots off of the budget SanDisk boots faster than my gaming rig with the EVO boot drive.

    Unless you are doing something, very often that makes use of the drives upper end ability, they are all more or less going to feel the same day to day and gaming.
     
    Wyodiver and Susquehannock like this.
  14. Susquehannock

    Susquehannock 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,966
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Samsung 860 EVO it is.

    Just noticed the 1tb units are $168 right now. Very tempting.
     
    Wyodiver likes this.
  15. Wyodiver

    Wyodiver [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,923
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2004
    $168 for a 1TB 860 EVO is pretty sweet. About 10 months ago I spent $85 for a 250GB 850 EVO, and I was pretty damned happy with the price! I have a 120GB SSD and a 250GB SSD, and a 1TB Spinner. It's amazing how fast the SSDs fill up. Hopefully the prices keep falling.
     
  16. deaedius

    deaedius Gawd

    Messages:
    768
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2014
    The prices are spot on right now, 1tb or 500+ cannot go wrong with the EVO.
     
  17. kirbyrj

    kirbyrj Why oh why didn't I take the BLUE pill?

    Messages:
    22,963
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    If you are migrating, the Samsung migration tool makes everything painless.
     
  18. daglesj

    daglesj [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,822
    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Waiting for the "You should not consider anything less than a dual RAID0 Optane 900p!" suggestion...