True, as I said before [H] came to defend AMD and you guys were very fair.
I just have two points
1. I thought the 290X did say "Up to 1GHz", if not then my memory was wrong.
2. I am not talking about false advertising, I am talking about how in both circumstances, by coincidence, the cards that reviewers recieved were faster than what consumers got. In the AMD situation it was due to fan speeds, in the MSI situation it was a base clock setting. In both situations an overly angry consumer could claim that faster cards were sent to reviewers on purpose to get glowing reviews. That claim against AMD did spread on the net. That is the 'fraud' claim I am talking about. At the risk of the ban hammer, If you cannot see a similarity then I don't know what to say.
I just have two points
1. I thought the 290X did say "Up to 1GHz", if not then my memory was wrong.
2. I am not talking about false advertising, I am talking about how in both circumstances, by coincidence, the cards that reviewers recieved were faster than what consumers got. In the AMD situation it was due to fan speeds, in the MSI situation it was a base clock setting. In both situations an overly angry consumer could claim that faster cards were sent to reviewers on purpose to get glowing reviews. That claim against AMD did spread on the net. That is the 'fraud' claim I am talking about. At the risk of the ban hammer, If you cannot see a similarity then I don't know what to say.
Last edited: