Originally posted by Rocketpig
To create a product just to make consumers think that your original product is a deal is ridiculous. Apple created the Mini to undercut their original iPod and to attract a different market (women in particular IMO, look at the colors) who might not be as tech-savvy as the posters on this board.
I'm not saying that they made the mini to make the regular look attractive. That would be corporate suicide, to introduce a product that is not meant to sell. (Not to be mistaken with not selling "well")
What I'm saying is that they priced it so that someone SPECIFICALLY looking at iPods would get a MORE expensive iPod, with higher capacity.
Meanwhile, someone looking at expensive flash players would see the cheaper mini iPod and get that instead of an iRiver/Rio/whatever.
They did make the mini iPod to attract a different market. Those looking for lower-capacity, "smaller" players. Not just women. I know several people who had the money for an iPod, but skipped out and bought a 512 mb based flash player because they didn't need 10-15gbs, it was smaller, and they could jog/ lift/ dragon boat with it easier than an iPod (and iPods are already small)
And by your accounts, all of the "flavored" iMacs were produced just to sell to women, then?
Also from looking at different micro-drive specs over the years (PCMCIA III, Compact-Flash style, etc) the cost difference between a 2gb and a 4gb is basically nil. So manufacturing a 2gb would cost the same amount of capital to manufacturing a 4gb.