Microsoft Snaps Up .adult And .porn Domains

H

HardOCP News

[H] News
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
0
Microsoft, along with other companies, brands and celebrities, has decided it would be smart to snap up .porn and .adult domains before they fell into the hands of trolls.

For example, Microsoft has already registered Office.porn and Office.adult, according to Stuart Lawley, CEO of ICM Registry, which operates the .porn and .adult top-level domains. The same goes for TaylorSwift.porn and TaylorSwift.adult.
Click to expand...
 
heatlesssun said:
Office.porn is a great domain name.
Click to expand...

I'll never look at an office suite the same way again.

...

It's no wonder people are so interested in getting "touch" support for OneNote these days.

...

Office.porn, THE LAST WORD in Microsoft Word.

...

No one wants to see porn-Clippy help write a letter.

...

:D Okay, I give up...so many awful places that you can go with this.
 
LOL,

Someone at Microsoft said wow, Taylor has a great idea, we should do that as well. Too funny it took so long.
 
Common sense again tells us that squatting should be illegal. There are a limited number of domain names available, so to have millions sitting unused only to be scalped to the highest bidder or squatted purely to ensure they are never used is BS!

Microsoft should be forced to make legitimate porn sites on those domains or give them up. Same with Taylor Swift, tits or GTFO!
 
Ducman69 said:
Microsoft should be forced to make legitimate porn sites on those domains or give them up.
Click to expand...
I would just like to point out that Clippy erotica is indeed a thing.

No, I'm not going to link to it. Yes, you should be ashamed for Googling it.
 
The sad (or funny?) part about this is that companies doing this are the only ones who will actually buy these TLDs, just like .xxx never really became a thing. With .xxx they even had a special registration option to pay a bunch of money to make it unavailable without actually registering and taking ownership of the domain. The company I worked for at the time spent thousands to keep other people from registering their trademarks, but the real XXX companies knew that dotcom is the only TD that matters.
 
Ducman69 said:
Common sense again tells us that squatting should be illegal. There are a limited number of domain names available, so to have millions sitting unused only to be scalped to the highest bidder or squatted purely to ensure they are never used is BS!

Microsoft should be forced to make legitimate porn sites on those domains or give them up. Same with Taylor Swift, tits or GTFO!
Click to expand...

Remind me to don full PPE if I ever come over to your house.:eek:
 
HardOCP.porn? a lot of non-tech people already think it's a porn site without a .porn at the end :)
 
squash said:
The sad (or funny?) part about this is that companies doing this are the only ones who will actually buy these TLDs, just like .xxx never really became a thing. With .xxx they even had a special registration option to pay a bunch of money to make it unavailable without actually registering and taking ownership of the domain. The company I worked for at the time spent thousands to keep other people from registering their trademarks, but the real XXX companies knew that dotcom is the only TD that matters.
Click to expand...

I'm sure that is the plan. Keep making these porn domains knowing that the big companies are guaranteed to pay big money under the supposed threat that they are going to be used by porn sites.
 
DPI said:
what tits
Click to expand...

Wow really? Do we need to start measuring men and making them post it on their forehead so they can be made fun of too for something they can't help? Just because you can hide it better doesn't mean it's okay to make fun of everyone else who also doesn't meet some dumb gland-size criteria. :rolleyes:
 
CreepyUncleGoogle said:
Wow really? Do we need to start measuring men and making them post it on their forehead so they can be made fun of too for something they can't help? Just because you can hide it better doesn't mean it's okay to make fun of everyone else who also doesn't meet some dumb gland-size criteria. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Lol. Besides, different people like different sizes :D
 
Damn now how am I gonna get my not completely unattractive women of microsoft nude at microsoft.porn fix? I mean, i've been waiting on this for years..
 
Koolthulu said:
I'm sure that is the plan. Keep making these porn domains knowing that the big companies are guaranteed to pay big money under the supposed threat that they are going to be used by porn sites.
Click to expand...

or the upcoming

.sucks

domain

another cash grab
 
CreepyUncleGoogle said:
Wow really? Do we need to start measuring men and making them post it on their forehead so they can be made fun of too for something they can't help? Just because you can hide it better doesn't mean it's okay to make fun of everyone else who also doesn't meet some dumb gland-size criteria. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

/shrug, wouldn't brother me.
 
Koolthulu said:
I'm sure that is the plan. Keep making these porn domains knowing that the big companies are guaranteed to pay big money under the supposed threat that they are going to be used by porn sites.
Click to expand...

AS far as I can tell, they keep approving TLDs with litle use because spammers buy them by the truckload, and thus they make money.

This is just an expansion on this in that now they can extort known businesses into trying ot protect their trdemarks and reputations.

They are messing up the internet for a quick buck, and it's very annoying.
 
Out of curiosity does Microsoft get first dibs on any related domains? And one could argue office isn't exactly an uncommon term.
 
Excel.porn. Gives new meaning to the word "spreadsheet".
 
What about AccessOffice.porn ?
Sounds kinda like a database command...
 
CreepyUncleGoogle said:
Wow really? Do we need to start measuring men and making them post it on their forehead so they can be made fun of too for something they can't help? Just because you can hide it better doesn't mean it's okay to make fun of everyone else who also doesn't meet some dumb gland-size criteria. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Really? She use to have something. Even if it was enhanced with a push up, you have to have something to push up. She's basically anorexic. She has a body fat index that someone can only maintain in a way that doesn't immediately risk their health with the use of a personal trainer and personal dietician. People not making millions binge purge, instead.

So basically you endorse this unrealistic waif body image?
 
jpm100 said:
Really? She use to have something. Even if it was enhanced with a push up, you have to have something to push up. She's basically anorexic. She has a body fat index that someone can only maintain in a way that doesn't immediately risk their health with the use of a personal trainer and personal dietician. People not making millions binge purge, instead.

So basically you endorse this unrealistic waif body image?
Click to expand...

Good diversion attempt! 2 points.
 
jpm100 said:
Really? She use to have something. Even if it was enhanced with a push up, you have to have something to push up. She's basically anorexic. She has a body fat index that someone can only maintain in a way that doesn't immediately risk their health with the use of a personal trainer and personal dietician. People not making millions binge purge, instead.

So basically you endorse this unrealistic waif body image?
Click to expand...

While I don't particularly care about her, I wanted to point out her body isn't unrealistic. I don't know her personally so I can't say if she comes by it naturally or not. However my sister in law is just as tiny and has been her entire life no matter how much she eats. So yes it is realistic even if it isn't attractive.
 
Dekoth-E- said:
While I don't particularly care about her, I wanted to point out her body isn't unrealistic. I don't know her personally so I can't say if she comes by it naturally or not. However my sister in law is just as tiny and has been her entire life no matter how much she eats. So yes it is realistic even if it isn't attractive.
Click to expand...

This is also true. Some people get stuck with the lame tickets in the genetic lottery. It's good for keeping off weight and stuff, but not so much for anything else in a huge-boob-centric world. Though there are people who like that kind of thing too, just not many of them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top