Zarathustra[H]
Extremely [H]
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2000
- Messages
- 41,036
I have to say I haven't used Nobara yet. I really should install it on a spare drive so I can at least see what the deal is. I mainly choose to redo my system with Cachy recently as I have been using arch or manjaro for awhile now. I was on Manjaro on my main system for a few years and had been running unstable branch anyway, which I guess defeated the purpose of using manjaro. Cachy is for sure fast... it is arch though so I would say its quite possibly a little more maintenance then Nobara would be? as its based on Fedora. (you have to end up babying a few arch specific things like pacdiff and the like) Maybe this weekend if I have an afternoon I'll install nobara and maybe run a few benchmark comparisons. I am going to bet performance is pretty close...
You know, a lot of people find booting different operating systems to be a pain in the ass, but I have come to appreciate it over time, as it allows me to keep things separated, and also allows me to set settings in my gaming focused OS that I wouldn't want in my every day productivity OS and vice versa.
I feel like with gaming in linux this is going to be even more true, as it seems like you need bleeding edge versions of the kernel, Wayland, etc. that you probably wouldn't want on your main productivity OS.
probably comes down to what your more familier with being the best choice. Of course if your coming from a DEB distro... RPM or Pacman its going to be a few new things to learn anyway.
Yeah, I love the way deb/apt is set up. It's as comfortable as a well worn glove at this point.
I haven't used RPM in a LONG time. Red Hat 7.3 Valhalla if memory serves. That must have been ~2001. I remember being frustrated with RPM as I found it difficult to keep track of what was installed and where. But I understand there are new tools (like Yum?) that didn't exist back then that make this process easier.
I have never used Pacman, but I can't imagine it would be too difficult to figure it out.
I would say you could compile the cachy kernel from GIT... as well as cachy-proton. You can also use a like ananicy-cpp to control process nice settings. It would probably be a pain constantly updating that. Probably more frustarting then just distro hopping.
Yeah, no. I remember the bad old days of compiling custom kernels to get shit to work. It's been close to 20 years since I last had to do that, and I don't want to have to deal with that kludgy shit ever again.