Microsoft Announces DX12 Support for Windows 7

Discussion in 'HardForum Tech News' started by cageymaru, Mar 12, 2019.

  1. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    963
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    No offense, but you remind me of a person whose life is wrapped up into the one thing they do, like making a special kind of rubber for some shoes that is 371% more efficient than other shoe rubber and absorbs 59% more impact than another shoe's rubber, and so everything for that person comes back to the topic of shoe rubber and how this one special kind of shoe rubber reigns supreme over all others and if anything bad happens it has to do with how that special shoe rubber wasn't used.


    The point of having a computer is to be able to do the things that you need and want to with it. Usability naturally comes before security, as without something usable there is no need for security to protect it. Therefore, when Microsoft's tyrannical updates regime threatens the usability of a system, the thing of primary importance, its usability, must be protected by shutting off those invading updates.

    Security is dependent upon there first being usability, and so usability is a greater consideration than security and security is secondary to usability.


    Any disruption, hoop-jumping, or delay to being able to do what a person needs and wants to on their computer is a problem.

    A person decides whether they want Microsoft to be harvesting personal and other data from their computer. And if they don't want Microsoft harvesting data from their computer, then Microsoft harvesting data from their computer without willed permission is a security risk.

    Windows Updates breaking things and bricking systems is a security failure.


    As has been stated, Windows Updates patches do not equate security, and are even large security risks. And letting Microsoft have free reign to do whatever they want to your PC and OS is a massive security hole.

    By arguing that people should have no control over their system is like stealing people's rights over their own property from them, and is advocating for Microsoft's reign of tyranny.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
    Zuul and scojer like this.
  2. dreadcthulhu

    dreadcthulhu [H]Lite

    Messages:
    122
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2017
    If Microsoft released a patch that did that, all that would happen is that people would do clean installs of Windows 7, and not allow it to do any updates, thus resulting in a huge number of machines with no security patches on them. And the idea that a software company should be able to put a kill switch in its software seems a lot more dangerous than a bunch of people not being properly patched. And how would that sort of thing even work with open source operating systems? The whole point of those is that the end user has control of what software runs on their computer, not anyone else.
     
    Stimpy88 and clockdogg like this.
  3. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    Yeah and just re train their entire dev team for the new API while they are at it and then make that transition for all their programs going forward while rebuilding all their development tools that they have been building and working in for the last 15 years .... It's not that easy to take an entrenched entity with a seasoned team and just switch API's like that. DX9->10->11->12 while requiring work isn't a complete rebuild from the ground up you can reuse a lot of your code base. And Apple still gives Vulkan a lot of headaches on their system they are probably better off working in DX12 and Metal for the foreseeable future especially if Apple does go ahead with their migration from Intel over to their own chips for their desktops & laptops.
     
  4. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,248
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000

    If given a choice between being compromised tomorrow or not using your system for a day, which would you choose? The answer should be simple. Better a day without a computer, than the often irreversible damage incurred by being compromised.

    There is a reason that the FDA requires medical device and pharma companies to prove safety before they even think about looking at efficacy.
     
    Darth Kyrie likes this.
  5. Bowman15

    Bowman15 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,238
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2015
    It's only for WOW. Big nothing burger.
     
  6. odditory

    odditory [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    5,458
    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    What does Apple have to do with gaming?

    They're not even in the personal computing business anymore.
     
    Lakados likes this.
  7. horrorshow

    horrorshow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,789
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
  8. PantherBlitz

    PantherBlitz Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    421
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Naahh. Just read the comments section on most sites or Twitter in general and you will see that it is well on the way to ruin with or without patches.
     
  9. Meeho

    Meeho [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,373
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    You're so full of shit it isn't funny anymore. Why stop there? Ban every Windows machine from accessing the Net, period. It should be Linux or nothing, as it's far more secure and botnet free than even a fully patched Win 10. You would want to keep the Internet as secure as possible, wouldn't you? Then continue by banning every Android phone while you're at it. Carry on indefinitely from there...
     
  10. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    WoW has a surprising number of OSX users.
     
  11. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,248
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    I believe in an absolute and unabiguous zero tolerance for ever running any unpatched software and I want it enforced to the greatest extent possible.

    With all the shit going down, data/identities stolen, people's finances ruined, ransomware, DDOS attacks, etc. etc. I can't sympathise with anyone who puts any other consideration ahead of this for any product running software and connected to a network.

    Even if you don't care about your own shit, by not patching you are increasing the risk to others.

    The paralells to the vaccine debate are strong.

    (Spoiler, I also believe anti-vaxxers should have their kids removed and belong in jail)
     
  12. Pieter3dnow

    Pieter3dnow [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    6,790
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    The amount of money WoW racked in over the years is so huge they could do a brand new engine every year and pay separate developers apart from the ones on WoW.

    The idea behind DX12 is that you can do things faster and make the engine way better. Guess how that is going in WoW under DX12 at one time they had a patch for multi core enhancements but a lot of people in raids kept disconnecting.
    I played WoW battle for azeroth and their glorious DX12 engine was much like DX11 :) (performance wise).
    It was a little bit better under DX12 but not that you can brag about it either.
     
  13. blkt

    blkt Gawd

    Messages:
    666
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    s-the-path-to-the-dark-side-fear-leads-to-anger-anger-leads-to-hate-hate-leads-to-suffering-yoda.jpg
     
  14. clockdogg

    clockdogg Gawd

    Messages:
    890
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2007

    The only way to ensure total security and compliance with your zero tolerance policy is to ban humans from using computers to exchange data with other humans using computers. Being fully patched at the OS level has no effect on phishing attacks. Surprised you're not advocating: Patch the humans, then the machines.

    While you're free to mix up your converging parallels, OS patching vs vaccinations are very very different things.

    Most of the successful attacks occurred against server infrastructure, (Equifax says hi), not single personal computers. When the large corps take security seriously and successfully, then perhaps we can get draconian with single users to only connect to the net using known secure systems. If only there was an open source, secure OS for end users...
     
  15. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,248
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    This is one of the oldest logical fallacies in the book.

    Just because we can never be perfect, doesn't mean we should not try to be the best we can be.
     
  16. Bowman15

    Bowman15 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,238
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2015
    Being a network administrator all I can say is you are wrong, I's no fallacy. All it takes is one stupid employee.
     
    Ebernanut, LightsOut41 and clockdogg like this.
  17. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    If it were linux or nothing you would see a huge number of attacks and exploits starting to be aimed at Linux and you would just see a repeat of Microsoft's woes, Linux systems have just as many security holes as Microsoft's does the difference is user experience and a hard stance on user practices.
     
    Meeho likes this.
  18. Meeho

    Meeho [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,373
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    It's as if the OS or its patch state is way down on the list of causes for most of the security/privacy problems online.
     
    Lakados likes this.
  19. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    MS needs to sell LTSB, I hate the updates
     
    LightsOut41 likes this.
  20. Meeho

    Meeho [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,373
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Almost none of the the above were caused by unpatched OSes. You're proving my point.

    I am anal about securing my own shit, which is exactly why I don't depend on Windows patches.

    Oh, I believe you do. Your authoritarian control fetish leaves no doubt there.
     
    funkydmunky likes this.
  21. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    They do sell it how else would anybody get it, the question is are you willing to pay what they are charging.
     
  22. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Realistically they aren't. As a home user its pretty much impossible
     
    Lakados likes this.
  23. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    What do you mean your "own shit"? On linux you write it yourself or depend on a stranger?
     
    Lakados likes this.
  24. Lakados

    Lakados [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    Yeah, there are a number of ways to get access to it one of which is through Office 365, but the cheapest option will still cost you a few hundred per year.
     
  25. jlbenedict

    jlbenedict [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,319
    Joined:
    May 22, 2005
    Is this just a wrapper with crap performance
     
    Lakados likes this.
  26. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    963
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    LightsOut41 and Meeho like this.
  27. Meeho

    Meeho [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,373
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    As in my data and my servers, workstations and home PCs. Securing them by using various software, hardware and usage practices that make the OS itself the last line of defense. If I rely on the OS patches to keep me safe, I consider it a failure on my part. That is why I could use an XP install today and have the same security record. I'm not talking about anything special here, just common sense iT configuration and practices.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
  28. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    I tried to look up the differences, what is the difference between that and LTSB? Is enterprise licenses someone is selling? Where do they come from?
     
  29. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    How do you determine trust?
     
  30. Delicieuxz

    Delicieuxz Gawd

    Messages:
    963
    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    The difference between Windows 10 LTSB 2016 and LTSC 2019 is the same difference between Windows 10 Pro 1511 and 1809. The LTSB edition of Windows 10 has been renamed to LTSC for the 2019 release, while still being the same edition.

    I guess the licenses come from whoever has an MSDN or VLSC account and wants to sell them. I'm not sure. It's legal to resell software, though, regardless of what the publisher thinks about it. So, it doesn't matter much to me beyond the detail that it means I can buy and run LTSC.
     
  31. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    This is good to know, thank you!
     
  32. Meeho

    Meeho [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,373
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Sorry, you've lost me. I have no idea what you're asking or what the context is.
     
  33. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Ok so if you secure your own things, at one point you have to trust a 3rd party unless you write your own OS or make your own hardware.
     
  34. earnolmartin

    earnolmartin Gawd

    Messages:
    517
    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2009
    Win XP (including x64) / Win 7 4 life. Still waiting for React OS.
     
  35. Meeho

    Meeho [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,373
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    I'm not about to write my TempleOS anytime soon.
     
  36. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Thats my point, you can't really secure anything yourself. You probably don't review patches do you?
     
  37. Meeho

    Meeho [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,373
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    You're making points against something I wasn't arguing.
     
  38. Zarathustra[H]

    Zarathustra[H] Official Forum Curmudgeon

    Messages:
    28,248
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2000
    You seem to completely misse the point. I am well aware that people often do stupid things.

    The logical fallacy is that just because people do stupid things, we should then disregard other areas of security like patching.

    It's like saying, most accidents are caused by distracted driving, so lets not bother replacing those worn tires.

    The fact that other problems exist is never a justification to not deal with a problem, unless you only have the budget or time to deal with a select few, in which case tackle the big ones and the easiest ones first.

    Making sure you patch your shit can have an effect, and is a lot easier to do than to fix the People problem, and a well patched system can be more resistant to such things as priveleged escalation which many of the stupid "I clicked the link" exploits rely on.
     
  39. Nausicaa

    Nausicaa [H]Lite

    Messages:
    120
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    The problem is that I don't trust their updates and they break stuff a lot. I get why they do this (I use linux but manually update quite often) but windows not so much. They are doing the best they can though.
     
  40. Bowman15

    Bowman15 [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,238
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2015

    Yikes, and you missed my point. The best patched system can still be circumvented by stupid employees. Ignoring real world issues like budget, time, lack of enough staff and or ignorant administration there is the simple fact that patching is not a simple process in a big corporation and testing takes time. Ever have an update or two take down domain software? I have and it's not pretty. It's not a fallacy IF you have to take hardware, software and the people that use it all into consideration. Dealing with IT is a reaction at best and admins will always be behind no matter what with zero day exploits and stupid employees. Its a never ending catch 22. Sure everyone wants to do the best security they can but in striving for fast "perfect security" you can actually cause more harm than good. Security is priority in corporations until it isn't. If you are master of your own pc at home good for you on security. But that is all your opinion is good for. That no excuse high horse you are riding is great but it's not reality.
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2019
    tetris42 likes this.