bartsimsonii
Gawd
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2005
- Messages
- 831
Hmmmm It doesn't seem it's been released.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FitzRoy said:Wow, super ugly bases..
qft! I did not believe when someone else posted it, so i looked for myself and "Wow" they really got this one right: ugliness to the max!clockworks said:Ugliest monitor bases on the planet.
Techx said:QFT, only way i'd consider buying it is if i planned on using an arm and releasing the base back into the gaping maw of uglyland from which it came
dclam said:id say thats a good sign
whats bad is the price difference between futureshop and best buy
399 canadian (350us) vs best buy @450-500
kuyaglen said:So I noticed that their 24" model is listed as an S-IPS panel. Hoping that upon release that these panels dont suffer from the banding and the HDCP input issues of the Dell 2407, would these typically show less "input lag" than the other 24" models currently available?
-domo
Dell doesn't build monitors, they rebadge. My 2001FP, which some people hated and some adored, used the LG.Philips LCD LM201U04. I believe Viewsonic was the second to use that panel, and it didn't come out until 8-10 months later and cost nearly double the Dell sale price.travbomb said:Besides the fact that LG doesnt make crap like Dell, .
LostStorm said:I say take it back . but either way can you please post some pictures.
FragMagnet said:Dell doesn't build monitors, they rebadge. My 2001FP, which some people hated and some adored, used the LG.Philips LCD LM201U04. I believe Viewsonic was the second to use that panel, and it didn't come out until 8-10 months later and cost nearly double the Dell sale price.
http://www.anandtech.com/displays/showdoc.aspx?i=1918&p=2
JohnleMVP said:Anyone find any more reviews on this monitor, I'm headed to canada soon and may pick one of these up.
vink said:I bought l204wt yesterday, when I test it at home, I found one bad pixel at middle-left, so i take it back to futureshop to exchange another one, then i found some dirty dots inside the screen surface, not outside so i can't clean it, once again i take it back to futureshop to exchange one, for the thrid one i get, i still find a bad pixel, but it locates at very right bottom, i choose to accept this one because i would not really use that pixel because it's at right to date/time on windows start bar. I've ask several employee of futureshop about lg monitor, all of them said it seldom happened on LG monitor, so i'm thinking why i've meet three of them??? So, what do you guys think? will you keep this one or will you take another chance to exchange another one until there is no bad pixel?
without the bad pixel, l204wt will be really really a good monitor, the color, contrast,... every is perfect, even the stand is acceptable to me.
gman said:Take it back. I would not settle for bad pixels, even one.
hi gman can i ask you, how is the nec x2 ?gman said:I've got the 203 and as far as I'm concerned it's a great monitor. Yes, it's TN, but it's sharp as hell, consistent color, little to NO backlighting and good menu. It looks like the 204 is just a continued version changing it form 1400 to 2000 contrast and 8ms to 5ms. I tried the Sammy 215, Viewsonic 2025, NEC X2 19" and this is the one that was close to what I thought an LCD should be. Anyway, my 2 cents.
placebo said:Why do you guys think that you are somehow entitled to a perfect display when there isn't a single manufacturer who will accept a return for under three dead pixels?
Oh, who am I kidding, return it till you get a perfect one.
That said, if you've got to have a deady, there's the right place to have it.
strikeout said:ASUS has a zero pixel defect policy i believe check out their 20in ws glossy.