That's all good information to have...except uhh....what does MSG4 stand for? I'm thinking Metal Gear Solid 4....but...uhhh....right?
Monosodium glutamate version 4...
mmm mmm delicious
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's all good information to have...except uhh....what does MSG4 stand for? I'm thinking Metal Gear Solid 4....but...uhhh....right?
Well of course it can. We are talking about the cut scenes which explains the why and this theatre analogy, right? Performance wise, they run neck and neck. If konami use the in-game engine for the cut scene then there wouldnt be a problem at all. And of course he must promote his game so he will say things like that to pique interest.
I didn't say that, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't doctor my posts. Anyways, I was a huge fan of MGS back when it was still good, but I've never heard of this kojima loser...
I didn't say that, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't doctor my posts.
I don't own halo....
I didn't say that, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't doctor my posts. Anyways, I was a huge fan of MGS back when it was still good, but I've never heard of this kojima loser...
Wow... first time I ever heard that.
So basically, Kojima is pushing the PS3 version first to appease Sony since it will undoubtedly be a timed exclusive.
Someone should let Kojima in on the little "secret" that the GPU in the 360 is easily more powerful than its PS3 counterpart.
What makes you so sure it is a timed exclusive other than your hate for sony? MGS series isn't all about shiny graphics but great gameplay, perhaps the cell or expanded storage space of the 50gb bd is something he cares to take advantage of. He has stated many times he plans to take the audio to a new level something the xbox clearly is more limited in. And GPUs arent they only thing responsible for graphics in the closed enviroment in consoles as CPUs can and do play a major role, there isnt one game out that can't be achieved on either system yet.
GTA4 is something I would much rather see multiplatform, as it seems to fit much better on the 360 with things like achievements and friends lists. .
Anyone else find it funny he uses the theater analogy, seeing as how MGS2 was basically an interactive movie?
Well, hopefully (and it seems) with the inclusion of Playstation Home, we'll be able to do just that on our Playstation 3s (achievements, friend lists, etc), only better with all the stuff that is possible on Home.
What makes you so sure it is a timed exclusive other than your hate for sony?
Perhaps Kojima just likes the PS3? I mean, there are people out there who bought a PS3 instead of an Xbox360. Out of all the developers out there, there would have to be some who chose the PS3. I don't think there's any need to suspect any deceit on his part, he's entitled to an opinion like everyone else.
I don't really give a damn what he thinks about the console war. I just want his game to be on my console.
The only think the X360 has going for it thats better than the PS3 are 3 little red lights.
So basically, Kojima is pushing the PS3 version first to appease Sony since it will undoubtedly be a timed exclusive.
Someone should let Kojima in on the little "secret" that the GPU in the 360 is easily more powerful than its PS3 counterpart.
...and a wider variety of games, cheaper pricepoint, a more promising outlook on upcoming exclusives, a unified online structure that has the same features for every game, a larger userbase, a higher attach ratio...
Yeah, who the fuck is Kojima and who the fuck cares? It's obviously going to be Sony Biased as it is Japanese based...
Big ups to Kojima for being in the game for so long, but like other people said, i dont get MGS... The guy does like one game right out of how ever many have been released, and hes considered the top dog for that genre? Sorry, the SC series is technically better.
guyver, devs can require a HDD if they want or have to. fee based is better than a broken free structure. HDMI isnt essential, and further more, HDMI 1.3 really isnt essential. EU PS3 owners WISH they had at least 50% BC, which btw, is hilarious that sony used BC to bash the 360, yet 6 months into the PS3, all of a sudden BC isnt as important. So which one is it?
360 is an established system, PS3 has a long way to go. Hope can only take it so far before ending up like the PSP.
...splintered console development base (HDD vs no HDD), fee based online structure, support for $200 HD-DVD doorstop, no HDMI w/o new investment for early adopters, a subjective opinion outlook on upcoming exclusives, less than 50% backwards compatibility...
Having an option between caching and no-caching isn't difficult, PSN has a fee-based online structure as well, an additional peripheral has nothing to do with this discussion, HDMI is irrelevant to the vast majority of consumers, and backwards compatibility is a novelty used by less than 10% of the userbase.
If you'd like to compare exclusives for 2007, we can. Most Sony fans rather wouldn't, though.
Having an option between caching and no-caching isn't difficult
PSN has a fee-based online structure as well
an additional peripheral has nothing to do with this discussion,
HDMI is irrelevant to the vast majority of consumers, and backwards compatibility is a novelty used by less than 10% of the userbase.
If you'd like to compare exclusives for 2007, we can. Most Sony fans rather wouldn't, though.
Again, I ask if it's so irrelevant then why the Elite? E-peen fodder?
I don't know about that. When he says, "the game's scenario and graphics need this theatre-type hardware. It's when a producer has a game that can work on the 'DVD level' that a game will go multiplatform" he is definately saying that the 360 can't handle what the PS3 can. He is saying that they are on a lower "level" than his game and that the 360 can't handle MGS4's "scenario and graphics." That looks pretty cut and dry to me.