At $325-$350 everybody would buy this card. nVIDIA wouldn't be able to keep it on the shelves. My further $.02. Out!
I've got news for you - at $550 Nvidia won't be able to keep them on the shelves, at least not for the first few months.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
At $325-$350 everybody would buy this card. nVIDIA wouldn't be able to keep it on the shelves. My further $.02. Out!
$329 for this puppy and it's a keeper.
Looks like Kepler is going to win on price, perf/watt, perf, price/perf, die size, power consumption, and drivers...
OMG12/21/2012 really is the end of the world, the timer has already started as hell just froze over
7970s are going to be going for $329.99 after this launches
Even at $500, 50 bucks less than the 7970 and is still faster is quite a feat. Even if they come out with the GTX 670, which if it is faster than the 7950 and 50 bucks cheaper at 400 (instead of 450) would be a great thing as well. It would force AMD to lower prices to continue being competitive.
As many have said, it be hard to initially find a 680. The price will probably be very high due to that. I wont be surprised if it's 600 dollars.
I've got news for you - at $550 Nvidia won't be able to keep them on the shelves, at least not for the first few months.
I really don't believe people are this stupid, so I'm starting to think every "Kepler will be price x dollors below..." post is a plant.
This. I can't even believe people are still dreaming about the sub-$500 price on 680, much less the $300 price for which the rumor was started by nV's guerilla marketing. $300 for a nV's top-end card... insanly optimistic. It will be $550 or a bit more. That's that, end of story. Nvidia will never undercut AMD on price if they have a similarly performing product. I don't even know why I deign to respond contrary to these ridiculous postulations that go against all historical pricing and basic economics.
I really don't believe people are this stupid, so I'm starting to think every "Kepler will be price x dollors below..." post is a plant.
I've got news for you - at $550 Nvidia won't be able to keep them on the shelves, at least not for the first few months.
Well, to be fair, the 8800 Ultra launched when NO competiton from ATi was even remotely possible, in any sense of the term.
Though, 800USD back then was a bit more than 800USD today (inflation), however, the willingness to pay 800USD for one computer part may be little more than halo marketing, really.
Even so who cares about 1080p performance you don't spend 500$+ on a video card to play at 1080p. Lets see the eyefinity resolution benches.
I've got news for you - at $550 Nvidia won't be able to keep them on the shelves, at least not for the first few months.
Pretty sure the most recent rumors are that the gtx 680 can support up to 4 monitors(3+1). Best part is they aren't forcing people to use displayport like amd which hopefully means no screen tearing.+1 Reviewers better be doing a 7970 vs 680 triple screen battle.
I think I read a rumor that the 680 can't do surround on one card though..
Pretty sure the most recent rumors are that the gtx 680 can support up to 4 monitors(3+1). Best part is they aren't forcing people to use displayport like amd which hopefully means no screen tearing.
Its in the HK "review" from this thread.And where did you hear that from? From what we know it has 2 dvi/1hdmi and 1 display port?
So its totally possible you will need to use a display port monitor.....but as of right now, we do not know
One thing you guys are forgetting is Nvidia is more than likely not interested in getting themselves in a price battle with AMD. After all if they both keep prices high they both win. If they both sell at a lower price point they both lose.
Pretty sure the most recent rumors are that the gtx 680 can support up to 4 monitors(3+1). Best part is they aren't forcing people to use displayport like amd which hopefully means no screen tearing.
Its in the HK "review" from this thread.
"For the practical application of the full range of the GeForce GTX, 500 series or the previous product, the core of integrated video signals, limiting the single a graphics card can only output up to a maximum of two screens, three-screen output to be run in SLI mode. flexibility weaker than rival AMD Eyefinity, but in order to combat AMD Eyefinity technology, NVIDIA is also a lack of existing products to enhance the flexibility of the multi-screen applications.
GeForce GTX 680 graphics cards support single card with two DVI and one HDMI output of the three-screen and 3D Vision's way to reach the NVIDIA 3D Vision Surround restrictions without the use of DisplayPort, flexibility even more than the AMD is better The DisplayPort interface, of course, users can also connect an additional display to the graphics card, four-screen output to the "3 +1" program, a single card."
...much less the $300 price for which the rumor was started by nV's guerilla marketing. $300 for a nV's top-end card... insanly optimistic.
http://www.shopblt.com/cgi-bin/shop...01501_BNG8027P.shtml&order_id=!ORDERID!#Specs
Maybe we will see a 500 msrp, if we count the 560 there as preorder being high as usual.
Listed lower than 7970 on neutron pricewise....
Btw that 3dmark11 score for 7970 is complete bullshit. Don't know if that has been said already.
I'm betting $499 just like the 480 and 580.
GTX680 @ 1110/1800 = 7950 @ 1260/1800
GTX 680 OC SLI @ 1150/1800 -VS.- HD7970 OC Crossfire @ 1150/1500
Wow.....Same core speed, 300mhz less memory on the 7970 crossfire, and its a tiny bit quicker.
did not expect that one.....Now if its priced at $500, AMD is in a world of trouble.
Those systems they were benched on are not the same, so I'm not sure this comparison does much good.
GTX 680 will be no lower than $500, most likely $550+. I'd stake my life on it![]()
GTX680 @ 1110/1800 = 7950 @ 1260/1800
why the hell they are in trouble ? those results are pretty weak for gpu that comes 3 months behind.Amd can lower prices any time they want that isn't problem imhoWow.....Same core speed, 300mhz less memory on the 7970 crossfire, and its a tiny bit quicker.
did not expect that one.....Now if its priced at $500, AMD is in a world of trouble.
why the hell they are in trouble ? those results are pretty weak for gpu that comes 3 months behind.Amd can lower prices any time they want that isn't problem imho