Grimlaking
2[H]4U
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,245
I think that will be the sweet spot for the Ryzen line of CPU's going forward. Right now the better memory speed you can eek out the better CPU performance gains are as compared to other manufacturers memory solutions.
So as the Ryzen line matures and we see 12 and 16 core Ryzens come out..
Do you think a 12 core solution will be...
4+4+4 at 3 memory channels.
And the 16 core at...
4+4+4+4 at 4 memory channels.
And more importantly do you think the additional available memory bandwidth will directly impact the IPC for the CPU, OR is it all about bus/memory speed and not total throughput?
I personally hope that the 12 and 16 core solutions really blow the doors off and equal or exceed Intel CPU IPC performance. This will put the Ryzen CPU's into more gaming and other high performance logic systems and not just ruling the roost for systems that need high Physical I/O because of increased PCIe lanes.
I think that AMD by making a server class chip for workstations will shoot itself in the foot by not extracting the additional performance to show how it bests intel on more fronts.
So as the Ryzen line matures and we see 12 and 16 core Ryzens come out..
Do you think a 12 core solution will be...
4+4+4 at 3 memory channels.
And the 16 core at...
4+4+4+4 at 4 memory channels.
And more importantly do you think the additional available memory bandwidth will directly impact the IPC for the CPU, OR is it all about bus/memory speed and not total throughput?
I personally hope that the 12 and 16 core solutions really blow the doors off and equal or exceed Intel CPU IPC performance. This will put the Ryzen CPU's into more gaming and other high performance logic systems and not just ruling the roost for systems that need high Physical I/O because of increased PCIe lanes.
I think that AMD by making a server class chip for workstations will shoot itself in the foot by not extracting the additional performance to show how it bests intel on more fronts.