Is Supreme Commander worth getting?

Discussion in 'PC Gaming & Hardware' started by IsaacMM, Jun 11, 2009.

  1. IsaacMM

    IsaacMM Gawd

    Messages:
    646
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    I've found a pretty good deal on this game, what is your opinion on it?
     
  2. JoNo216

    JoNo216 Gawd

    Messages:
    646
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    GET IT! It's a fantastic RTS that brings many new and wonder things to RTSs. Good balancing, and huge maps. The econopmy is a bit hard to adjust to if you never played TA before but it's easy enough to pick up...

    If you love giant robots then you should be kicking yourself for not already picking it up!

    But it is a nice game I spotted it @ BestBuy for 9.99 last night... Not sure if that is better then what you found or not... but just and fyi...
     
  3. grizzed

    grizzed Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    171
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Very solid RTS - get it.

    This is RTS on a large scale. It can stress some older CPU/Video Card combo's. Anything fairly recent shouldn't have any problem
     
  4. GJSNeptune

    GJSNeptune [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,372
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Yes.

    It's worth playing even if just for the build queue.
     
  5. sculelos

    sculelos [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    4,690
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    I bought it a long time ago. I thought it was a lot of fun although I only played against CPU on skirmish and online a few times. Online matches never seemed to be even seeing as I either kicked the other person's but badly or he did the same to me, maby things have changed now. Either way Dawn of War II is probably my next rts of choice.
     
  6. theman7233

    theman7233 Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    247
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    BUY IT NOW. the only thing is you need a pretty beefy computer when you play with hundreds of units. i tested my i7 at 3.5 and sli 260's i tried to take 400 level one bombers to the enemies base and my computer took a shit when i selected all then units
     
  7. N3mi5is

    N3mi5is Gawd

    Messages:
    915
    Joined:
    May 13, 2007
    Lower your o/c a bit then?

    My x2 5000+ gets a little slow with alot of units but I've yet to have it crash ?

    Back on topic.

    Get it.

    Enjoy it while you can because SupCom 2 has no build queue.
     
  8. dj_2004

    dj_2004 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,279
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    I strongly suggest getting the expansion (Forged Alliance) too.
     
  9. GJSNeptune

    GJSNeptune [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,372
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    SupCom 2!?
     
  10. dj_2004

    dj_2004 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,279
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
  11. tmbroe01

    tmbroe01 n00b

    Messages:
    30
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    I plan to enjoy it for a long time, since from I've seen, I've no plans to ever get SupCom2. I read that they are doing away with the economy, and the fact that it's being codeveloped for the 360 doesn't make me feel better. I mean, the 360 couldn't handle the scale of the orginal SupCom (just look at the port), so SupCom2 is going to be SupCom1 but scaled down? I thought sequels were usually bigger and better?
     
  12. GJSNeptune

    GJSNeptune [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    12,372
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    What idiot decided the queue should disappear? If anything, I thought they'd improve the queue by letting me interrupt it without breaking it.
     
  13. MR_Wendel

    MR_Wendel n00b

    Messages:
    18
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2009
  14. Tarrosion

    Tarrosion [H]Lite

    Messages:
    110
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    I've got to agree with the above. It's a fantastic RTS. At first I found the game somewhat fast-paced, but once I got used to the mechanics of it I really enjoyed it. SupCom seems remarkably well balanced as well, and a variety of strategies have a chance of success. Don't play for the story, but the campaigns are actually rather fun as well.
     
  15. pigwalk

    pigwalk [H]ardForum Junkie

    Messages:
    8,422
    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Loved the game, just to really play it MP and stay competitive, but the games were too long and I didn't have enough free time to invest to good enough to enjoy MP too much.
     
  16. Kendrak

    Kendrak [H]ard|DCer of the Year 2009

    Messages:
    21,142
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Very fun game.

    I got up the point where I could hold my own in online games and even win against some good players. I'm very out of practice now, but I had house of fun.
     
  17. mas

    mas [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,230
    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    you have to, there's really no point in buying it now unless you get the expansion because they killed off the original community. I don't think thq is even shipping vanilla supcom anymore.

    so if you buy supreme commander, you have to buy 2 games. if you're cool with that then sure it's worth getting. if you were upgrading I would say don't bother, but the gold edition is only $30 now and it comes with both. if you are looking at some bargain bin sale of plain supcom do not buy it unless you just want a dirt cheap copy to play the sp campaign and skirmishes. since then you would have to get the xpack seperately which could end up costing more.
     
  18. CypherNinja

    CypherNinja [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,732
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2002
    So they're planning on pulling a Deus Ex 2? :( :( :(

    Now I'm depressed.......
     
  19. Spewn

    Spewn 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,459
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2001
    It's worth it for Tactical Zoom alone IMO. Supreme Commander plays very well, it's a lot of fun. Forged Alliance campaign maps are giantic, and the way Supreme Commander allows you to interact with the game really makes the most of it.
     
  20. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,570
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008

    i agree.. FA was far better then the first supcom.. they fixed a lot of the glitches.. along with the memory allocation problems the first supcom had..

    its a very addicting game.. especially when you build 20 nuke silo's and 3 experimental silo's.. then fire off 103 nukes in succession.. its pretty bad ass..


    and honestly.. i could care less if they get rid of the economy portion in supcom 2.. im still buying the game.. ive been a fan of the series from the beginning with total annihilation.. i own every single version thats come out.. and still play TA..
     
  21. dj_2004

    dj_2004 [H]ardness Supreme

    Messages:
    7,279
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Queues may not be gone, just that all things are now paid upfront. Take a gander at this thread, specifically Eric's post: http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?t=37500
     
  22. Blackstone

    Blackstone 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,065
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    You absolutely need the Forged Alliance expansion if you buy SupCom. Don't bother with Vanilla Supcom.
     
  23. Blackstone

    Blackstone 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,065
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    I think what they mean is that you can que units, but each time a unit starts production, the entire quantity of resources required to build that unit is due. The way it is now, the factories production activity drains the economy for the duration of the construction.

    The advantage is that at any given moment you would be able to see the resources you have and the resources required to create an additional unit. The other advantage with pay up front is that if you pay up front, other activities cannot later interrupt construction. Right now you can put an order in for 10 bombers but production on the first bomber might grind to almost a halt because you get attacked and have to throw up some turrets, going into negative mass. With pay up front, when construction starts it will always finish on time. So it would seem they are doing away with negative mass slowing you down.
     
    Last edited: Jun 13, 2009
  24. nullzero

    nullzero Gawd

    Messages:
    786
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    Yeah I suggest getting it and Forged Alliance. Supcom is a lot of fun and has cutting edge technology for an RTS that no other RTS's have. I am patiently waiting for SupCom 2 :) it should be even more fun since they can concentrate more on gameplay and less on the engine (since supcom 2 will be heavily modified supcom 1 engine).
     
  25. Obi_Kwiet

    Obi_Kwiet 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,858
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    It might have run out of memory space. Once it needs more than 2GB of RAM it crashes. I wish they would release a 64bit build.
     
  26. JRizEJ6

    JRizEJ6 [H]Lite

    Messages:
    105
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    dont mean to hijack but going on what Obi said...is that a known issue with forged alliance? supcom plays flawlessly on my rig but when i try to play FA i get maybe about 20-30 mins of playtime before it crashes to desktop.
     
  27. Yawnald

    Yawnald [H]Lite

    Messages:
    81
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Wonderful game! SC:FA is one of the only games perpetually installed on all of my computers for LAN battles.
     
  28. Rebel44

    Rebel44 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    2,284
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    I agree - this game need 64bit version.

    [​IMG]
     
  29. sirmonkey1985

    sirmonkey1985 [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2010

    Messages:
    21,570
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008

    google "supreme commander memory allocation fix" or "supreme commander 2GB limit"

    should get you the info on how to fix that problem..



    what version are you running? and are you using the no limit resource mod?

    the only time SC:FA goes nuts on me is when it decides it doesnt like my overclock on my 8800GT even though the overclock runs fine on every other game..
     
  30. ThisIsTheNewSound

    ThisIsTheNewSound Limp Gawd

    Messages:
    456
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    what....upfront payments? that completely ruins the economic system that TA/SC1 had going! I really liked that part of the game, not many RTS games did it this way :(

    Ugh, why do companies feel the need to completely change the core of a game for the next iteration? Or do we just blame square enix for infecting supcom with a severe case of consoleitis? Don't even get me started on the "unlock tree" instead of tech levels.
     
  31. necrophile

    necrophile [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,243
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    If you get it, at least the plain first one, you will need mad boris' core optimiser and 3GB ram limit enabler as mentioned a few posts up.

    I've read of problems for a few people who don't use these and try to play large maps.
     
  32. WarriorX

    WarriorX [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    2,040
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Somewhat off topic but is there any word about online saves in SupCom2?
     
  33. heelix

    heelix [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,066
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    I've been intending on picking up the Forged Alliance addition when I see it for cheap. That said, even the first version is a very cool game. The scroll wheel had ruined almost every other game for me. I can zoom in, zoom out - very natural. You expect other games to do the same, only to find they have just a bit of wiggle room. The other is this is one of the first games I've had that really make a multiple monitor configuration shine. You can have two maps - one zoomed out for a tactical overview, another monitor for the action.
     
  34. eddie500

    eddie500 Gawd

    Messages:
    932
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    I was wondering if someone can tell me how many people play multiplayer with this game? I'm thinking of buying it but want to know if it still has a lot of people playing it? I'm worried because it is a couple of years old that people haved moved on?
     
  35. rampantandroid

    rampantandroid [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,962
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Am I the only person who thought SupCom was a horribly slow game? It took effing forever for a single unit to build. The physics were nice as were the graphics, but that was were the good things ended for me.

    To put perspective on it, I play SOASE at its default speed settings and enjoy it.
     
  36. necrophile

    necrophile [H]ard|Gawd

    Messages:
    1,243
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    You can increase the speed that things build, by placing things like power generators close to things and mass storage devices plus assigning engineers to help and you can spread production of large amounts of units over multiple factories.

    You can pump out most units fairly fast with the right base setup.
     
  37. Spewn

    Spewn 2[H]4U

    Messages:
    3,459
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2001
    You probably just needed a heck of a lot more engineers than you had.
     
  38. eddie500

    eddie500 Gawd

    Messages:
    932
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    I was wondering if someone can tell me how many people play multiplayer with this game? I'm thinking of buying it but want to know if it still has a lot of people playing it? I'm worried because it is a couple of years old that people haved moved on?