Until you can offer me incontrovertible proof that the F@H/WCG work units you are doing are what they say they are, this argument is logically invalid. Pretty pictures of proteins spinning around do not count, and neither do happy stories about clean water for the third world. How can you be so skeptical of bitcoin yet so accepting of F@H/WCG? It's a glaring double-standard.
http://folding.stanford.edu/English/Papers
the papers that have been released with the work done with F@H......
what all has bitcoin accomplished ?